Automox vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete comparison

Automox and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Automox is ranked #54 with an average rating of 7.0, while SentinelOne is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Automox holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to SentinelOne’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 10 Automox reviews

579 Views
430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Read 192 SentinelOne Singularity Complete reviews

24,829 Views
12,945 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Automox

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Automox are two leading cybersecurity solutions. SentinelOne Singularity Complete seems to have the upper hand due to its broader range of functionalities and better user preferences in certain areas.

Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers comprehensive endpoint protection, AI-driven threat detection, and automated response capabilities. Automox provides strong patch management, vulnerability remediation, and robust automation for patching.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne Singularity Complete could enhance its reporting functionalities and integration capabilities. Automox needs better support for macOS, more advanced configuration options, and fewer critical improvement points.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne Singularity Complete is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Automox receives positive feedback for ease of deployment but lags behind in customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete is considered a premium solution with higher upfront costs, but users report a favorable ROI due to its extensive security features. Automox offers more affordable pricing but some users feel the ROI is lower due to its narrower focus on patch management.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 830,726 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

54th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (46th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (18th), Patch Management (14th)

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

192

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is 4.3%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Jack Leung

EMEA Senior Systems Engineer at Quaker Chemical Corporation

Easy to use and deploy agents but needs more stability

We just need to deploy the agent to the endpoints. We don't need to set up anything. For a single agent, it takes one or two minutes. However, we deployed globally, and you need to take into consideration the time it will take to deploy across each endpoint. It's very simple to deploy. We had three or four engineers take care of the implementation.

Read full review

Asim Naeem

Principal IT Security & Compliance at IBEX Holdings Ltd

It integrates well with other platforms, is user-friendly, and is stable

SentinelOne Singularity Complete integrates with our other security solutions, correlating data from NDR, ADR, SIEM, and XDR tools. All this information is consolidated within SentinelOne, providing a centralized access point. SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped us streamline our security operations by consolidating multiple solutions into a single platform. We are currently in the process of acquiring a threat intelligence platform to complete our security stack. We use Ranger to monitor our network and track connected devices. This is crucial because it helps us quickly identify unauthorized machines connected to our infrastructure, including personal devices. We have additional security measures in place, but Ranger provides an extra layer of protection. It also alerts us if the SentinelOne Singularity Complete agent is missing from any new or existing machines, allowing us to take appropriate action. SentinelOne Ranger's agentless and hardware-independent nature is crucial for our environment with 26,000 endpoints, as manual management of such a large number would be extremely challenging. Ranger uses a multi-layered approach to prevent vulnerable devices from being compromised. We employ scanners, network configurations, and a risk scanner to assess devices, endpoints, servers, and cloud infrastructures. Vulnerability reports and timelines for remediation are shared with device owners or custodians. This proactive strategy enables us to address vulnerabilities efficiently and secure our infrastructure. SentinelOne Singularity Complete has significantly enhanced our security posture. While no system is impenetrable, this solution has brought us closer to achieving a high level of protection, ensuring we maintain at least a 90 percent security level. Our team is dedicated to refining alerts and eliminating false positives from our solutions. Additionally, a team is responsible for identifying and excluding alerts from the solution. We can manually expedite this process by reviewing these elements and utilizing our security tools. We have been able to reduce the alert volume by 20 percent. Our 30-member Security Operations Center team has been able to redirect their focus to other tasks due to the time saved after implementing SentinelOne Singularity Complete. SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped us improve our mean time to detect threats, which we accomplish using the Vigilance service for detection and response. SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped us decrease our organizational risk. We utilize the Security Scorecard to manage our security posture, which has remained steady at 90 percent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Previously, we would run a report, scan it, and compare it. We were spending 15 to 30 minutes a month on each machine on this stuff because you would find stuff that wasn't up to date, then you had to fix it. This solution takes that time down to minutes. Automox saves us easily many hours a month."

"Its flexibility is most valuable."

"They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic."

"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great."

"Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints."

"The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours."

More Automox pros

"The solution is easy to set up."

"The reporting part is awesome."

"We find the solution to be scalable."

"The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are the ease of deployment with the Sentinel Agent and the enhanced visibility with Skylight, which provides correlation of logs and all endpoint data in a centralized location."

"It identifies what applications are vulnerable. If I go to the applications, such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Reader, I can see our current list of vulnerabilities: How many are vulnerable and how many need to be updated with patching. One of the most valuable aspects is the ease of finding specific vulnerabilities."

"One of the features that convinced us to adopt SentinelOne was that the solution can recognize and respond to attacks with or without a network connection. That is very important."

"The detection rate for Sentinel One has been excellent and we have been able to resolve many potential threats with zero client impact. The ability to deploy via our RMM allows us to quickly secure new clients and provides peace of mind."

"The tool's most valuable feature is EDR."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pros

Cons

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying. We have probably up to 15 or 16 of our clients on Automox now. For every single one of those, we have had to go in and set this up. Then, if anything changes, we have to remember to go to Automox and change it 15 or 16 times. So, we just want inheritable permissions, and that is it. We have talked to them about this, and they are like, "Yeah, we hear a lot of complaints about it." I am thinking, "Guys, I have been complaining about this for a year and a half. When are you going to do it?" It must be some tricky thing or not an easy fix, because I can only assume if it were easy, then they would have done it by now."

"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned."

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

"We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs."

More Automox cons

"With respect to product patches, it should have the ability to patch directly from SentinelOne, rather than be presented with a list and have to do it separately."

"I would like to see the reports from SentinelOne more customizable, as there are very few options."

"Initially, when we first deployed the solution, it caused some third-party connectivity issues."

"Singularity Complete needs to improve its ability to granularly select and extract the executable files that I want to run."

"The agent update is not the most intuitive process, but I understand why they do it. We have a pretty vertical 64-bit environment for Windows. That is pretty much all we have, but we get alerts for things like the new Linux endpoint or things that do not apply to us. That is probably the only thing that I do not like. There may be some way to turn that off so that I do not get endpoint update alerts from platforms that are not applicable to our system, enterprise, or network."

"We ran into production issues related to CPU utilization on Linux endpoints. Our production environment's performance got degraded like anything."

"The way Singularity Complete handles blocking external mass storage is annoying because it is so difficult to unblock single endpoints."

"SentinelOne can improve by having better integration with Active Directory."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

"The product is a great value."

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing is at par with what you see among major competitors. It's higher than McAfee, yet cheaper than CrowdStrike."

"The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec."

"The pricing of the solution seems reasonable, we got a discount but it still seems reasonable. The licensing cost is $3 to $4 per endpoint and can be paid monthly or yearly, with the price changing according to commitment."

"The pricing for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is competitive."

"I did not notice a significant increase in cost after adding SentinelOne."

"The cost of utilizing all the features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is high."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete is expensive compared to Microsoft but not Sophos."

"We have not been beaten in the market by pricing, so we have been feeling good about that. The discussions we have had over the years keep us at a very low price per unit. It can always get better, but we also know there is a cost to the backend."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automox?

It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

They need to improve the automation features. It could be more stable.

See all answers

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...

See all answers

Which is better - SentinelOne or Darktrace?

Which solution is better depends on which is more suitable specifically for your company. Darktrace, for example, is meant for smaller to medium-sized businesses. It is also a good option for organ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SentinelOne?

The AI solution makes it easy for customers to detect and manage policies, as well as documents that help customers manage their platform.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 30% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 15% of the time

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Darktrace vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 8% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

January 2025

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

November 2024

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sentinel Labs, SentinelOne Singularity

Learn More

Automox

SentinelOne

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides AI-driven threat detection and response with features like ransomware protection and rollback, offering endpoint protection with minimal system impact and deep forensic analysis.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete combines machine learning and artificial intelligence to offer robust endpoint protection. It delivers real-time insights and advanced threat detection through seamless integration with third-party tools, allowing for efficient endpoint management. With an emphasis on user-friendliness, it ensures reduced false positives. Room for improvement includes better integration options, enhanced reporting, and more precise analytics to tackle false positives. Users seek improved interoperability with systems and comprehensive support for legacy systems.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete?

Rollback Feature: Enables restoration of affected systems to a healthy state after an attack.
Ransomware Protection: Advanced mechanisms to prevent and mitigate ransomware threats.
Machine Learning and AI: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for precise threat detection and response.
Seamless Integration: Works well with third-party tools for enhanced endpoint protection.
Real-Time Protection: Proactively defends against advanced threats with minimal delays.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced False Positives: Accurate threat detection limits operational disruptions.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Ensures security with low system impact.
User-Friendly Experience: Simplified management and ease of use aid productivity.
Deep Forensic Analysis: Assists in effective threat investigation and response.
Cost-Effective Security: Positions as a worthwhile alternative to traditional antivirus solutions.

Organizations from industries like finance, healthcare, and technology deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete to safeguard endpoints such as PCs, servers, and virtual machines. Equipped with EDR, it effectively replaces traditional antivirus systems and integrates with cloud technology for real-time security insights.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Havas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

January 2025

Free Report: Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.