AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Sauce Labs and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Sauce Labs is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Sauce Labs holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to OpenText’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sauce Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Read 1 AutonomIQ TestIQ review

210 Views
71 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,434 Views
4,702 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AutonomIQ TestIQ

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutonomIQ TestIQ

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of AutonomIQ TestIQ is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at IGT Solutions

A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly

AutonomIQ TestIQ is only available on mobile devices and on the web. I wish to see AutonomIQ TestIQ in a different area, like game automation or game testing. There is no tool or support offered in the market for game testing. The automatic automation should help capture videos, logs, audio, and other steps with which the user plays that particular game if I want to automate any graphical game with the help of a low-code and no-code tool, like AutonomIQ TestIQ. The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement.

Read full review

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy and straightforward."

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."

"Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator."

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."

"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The solution needs better marketing, training, promotion, and visibility because it is not visible."

"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."

"We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing."

"Micro Focus UFT One could improve by having more maintenance. Every time when we run the solution and develop something, the next time when we run it it doesn't recognize the object. I have to redesign the object again and then run the solution. It's really a headache, it's not consistent."

"The speed could be improved because a large test suite takes some time to execute."

"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."

"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."

"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AutonomIQ TestIQ?

UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AutonomIQ TestIQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AutonomIQ TestIQ?

AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool from SoftLab. My company uses the solution since it is a low-code and no-code automation tool. AutonomIQ TestIQ is a tool with which you don't require to use coding and c...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2025

Download AutonomIQ TestIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

March 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Run your automated tests in parallel to improve results velocity by 10x or more and give your development teams the fast feedback they need. Quickly and easily update your existing Selenium and Appium scripts to run on the Sauce Labs Continuous Testing Cloud.

Sauce Labs

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.