AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."

"The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers."

"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."

"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."

"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."

"It is very simple to use, and the scripting language is even easier."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"The speed could be improved because a large test suite takes some time to execute."

"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."

"The solution is expensive."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."

"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."

"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."

"We'd like it to have less scripting."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"It's an expensive solution."