AutonomIQ TestIQ vs OpenText UFT One comparison

"UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

"The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel."

"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."

"The initial setup is relatively easy."

"The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests."

"I like the fact that you can record and play the record of your step scripts, and UFT One creates the steps for you in the code base. After that, you can alter the code, and it's more of a natural language code."

"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."

"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."

"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."

"The AI feature needs improvement. For banking applications, we input formatted text from documents, but the AI feature is recognizing three fields as one field, e.g., for a phone number, it puts all 10 digits in the international code or country code. Then, the script fails."

"The user interface could be improved"

"I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications."

"The solution does not have proper scripting."

"The price is reasonable."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."