Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs AWS X-Ray comparison

AWS Auto Scaling and AWS X-Ray are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. AWS Auto Scaling is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.6, while AWS X-Ray is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. AWS Auto Scaling holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to AWS X-Ray’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of AWS Auto Scaling users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AWS X-Ray users who would recommend it.
AWS Auto Scaling
Read 19 AWS Auto Scaling reviews
  • 250 Views
  • 175 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
AWS X-Ray
Read 6 AWS X-Ray reviews
  • 6,507 Views
  • 5,878 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

AWS X-Ray and AWS Auto Scaling are two distinct services in the AWS ecosystem. Based on user reviews, AWS Auto Scaling appears to have the upper hand due to its robust feature set, though AWS X-Ray is favored for its simplicity.

Features: AWS X-Ray offers detailed tracing capabilities, service map visualization, and quick identification of performance bottlenecks. AWS Auto Scaling provides automatic resource scaling, ensures optimal performance, and reduces costs, making it superior in automation and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: AWS X-Ray could improve by enhancing its integration with more AWS services, supporting larger environments, and providing better flexibility. AWS Auto Scaling needs more intuitive setup options, granular control over scaling policies, and usability enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS X-Ray is noted for simple deployment and responsive customer service, with easy integration into existing systems. AWS Auto Scaling also has good deployment reviews, though initial configuration can be tricky. Both have good customer service, but AWS Auto Scaling's steeper learning curve poses a challenge.

Pricing and ROI: AWS X-Ray is cost-effective and offers a good return on investment through improved visibility. AWS Auto Scaling, while more expensive, saves costs by optimizing resource usage and offers a higher long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS X-Ray
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS X-Ray is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

PRABHAT_MISHRA - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 27, 2024
User-friendly interface and provides autoscaling without manual intervention
We utilize AWS Auto Scaling to handle peak traffic times in our application using scheduled scaling. We have scheduled traffic in the morning when we have higher traffic. Previously, we had customer issues with requests failing because of manual intervention. After enabling AWS Auto Scaling, none of the requests failed, giving a very smooth customer experience. In that way, the solution reduced our operational costs. The solution's health check feature is very important because it checks the heartbeat of the application to know whether it's running or not. If it's not running, we automatically get notified and look into the application to see what caused it. The health check integration feature has helped with the availability of the application. I would recommend the solution to people looking for automatic scaling of their application. Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
Read full review
Parth Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 29, 2022
Saves time, is relatively cheap, and helps find errors
It's basically like a cloud stack.  You can trace your entire HTTP request. Once you have submitted any request, it will be addressed as a 500 Error or 401 Error, or if there is any exception happening when this request, and how much time will take. X-Ray can trace all the information about the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."
"The setup is not very complex."
More AWS Auto Scaling pros
"AWS X-RAY identifies bottlenecks in terms of stability and performance and how long certain data lives in terms of response time and duration."
"The most promising feature of AWS X-Ray is that you can debug the issues through the proper logs. You can also get an analysis out of the logs for some use cases, though I have yet to try all the features of AWS X-Ray."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The solution has made it easier for us to trace the problems that we have with our requests and to monitor the timing of each step in each request we do in our endpoints."
"The most important one is compliance. We're able to achieve our regulatory levels. We're able to achieve the security level that we need for the federal government."
"AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process."
 

Cons

"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
More AWS Auto Scaling cons
"The user interface is sometimes kind of confusing to understand. It's not very user-friendly."
"Like most Amazon products, the user interface, configuration, and tuning aren't the easiest. That's the biggest reason why people tend to go to products like TerraForm and Terragrunt. We use TerraForm and Terragrunt. So, for setting things up and interacting with X-Ray, it's definitely the user interface that can be better."
"What needs to be better in AWS X-Ray is the log filtering. Predefined filters could be helpful because the power of analytics comes from how you can filter the data. I also want to see more KPIs from AWS X-Ray."
"They can improve how traces are sent to other providers."
"If you have a small team, it's probably overkill."
"I do not have any notes in terms of improvements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."
"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"As you develop a relationship with Amazon, your pricing gets lower. You get credits for the amount of the system you use, and then if you're the government, you can get government pricing. For commercial users, there's a hump when you go from small to medium to big enterprise. Small businesses can live pretty easily off the free tier in a lot of cases, but when you go from a medium to a big enterprise, it becomes more expensive on a per-user basis. I'd like to see that curve going in a different way where pricing can be driven down while people are trying to adopt the technology."
"The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution. We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly.
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS X-Ray?
AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS X-Ray?
The solution is a bit expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS X-Ray?
They can improve how traces are sent to other providers.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText SiteScope vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
OpenText SiteScope vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 100% of the time
More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors
Datadog vs AWS X-Ray Logo
Datadog vs AWS X-Ray
Compared 18% of the time
Sentry vs AWS X-Ray Logo
Sentry vs AWS X-Ray
Compared 14% of the time
Azure Monitor vs AWS X-Ray Logo
Azure Monitor vs AWS X-Ray
Compared 14% of the time
New Relic vs AWS X-Ray Logo
New Relic vs AWS X-Ray
Compared 13% of the time
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs AWS X-Ray Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs AWS X-Ray
Compared 12% of the time
More AWS X-Ray Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
October 2024
AWS Auto Scaling reportDownload AWS Auto Scaling product report
Buyer's Guide
AWS X-Ray
November 2024
AWS X-Ray reportDownload AWS X-Ray product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
No data available
 

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
 

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

AWS X-Ray is a powerful debugging and performance analysis tool offered by Amazon Web Services. It allows developers to trace requests made to their applications and identify bottlenecks and issues. 

With X-Ray, developers can visualize the entire request flow and pinpoint the exact location where errors occur. It provides detailed insights into the performance of individual components and helps optimize the overall application performance. 

X-Ray integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, making it easy to trace requests across different services and identify dependencies. It also offers a comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs, enabling developers to instrument their applications and capture valuable data for analysis. With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, AWS X-Ray is a valuable tool for developers looking to improve the performance and reliability of their applications.

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
COMCAST, ConnectWise, skyscanner, AirAsia, cookpad, cimpress, VTEX, zowdow
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray
October 2024
Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. AWS X-Ray report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.