HashiCorp Terraform and AWS CloudFormation compete in the infrastructure as code category. HashiCorp Terraform seems to have the upper hand due to its cross-cloud capabilities and modularity, offering broader flexibility than the AWS-centric CloudFormation.
Features: HashiCorp Terraform enables infrastructure as code, allowing easy replication of environments and automation. It supports multiple cloud platforms with a simple HCL syntax, enhancing usability for developers. Its flexibility across different cloud providers is a notable advantage. AWS CloudFormation offers seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem. It uses JSON or YAML, languages considered more human-readable than HCL, and provides user-friendly templates that streamline AWS service deployment.
Room for Improvement: HashiCorp Terraform's reliance on third-party plugins raises security and maintenance concerns, necessitating better plugin certification and support. Its error handling, documentation, and user interface could be improved for non-technical users. AWS CloudFormation could enhance cross-cloud functionality and support beyond YAML and JSON, as its AWS-centric approach limits multi-cloud flexibility. Documentation improvements would also aid developers less familiar with coding.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HashiCorp Terraform offers deployment flexibility across public, hybrid, and on-premises clouds, making it versatile. However, its support is mainly community-based with mixed reviews on responsiveness. AWS CloudFormation provides a straightforward deployment process within the AWS infrastructure. AWS CloudFormation's customer support has a better perception, although some users face challenges with responsiveness and prompt issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: HashiCorp Terraform's open-source nature provides a cost-effective entry, but its enterprise offerings are considered high for small-scale implementations. The ROI is significant through automation and reduced operational overhead. AWS CloudFormation is free for AWS users, charging only for deployed AWS resources, presenting a cost-effective solution within the AWS ecosystem. Both tools offer substantial ROI via automation and resource management, although Terraform's flexibility enhances its appeal for multi-cloud strategies.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
Applications are deployed through Intune, and we see fewer tickets for common issues because we can resolve them through the solution.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
While this might be acceptable for some, it can be lengthy depending on the urgency of the issue.
Free support for AWS CloudFormation is not provided, and while some support is understandable due to its complexity, assistance for service-related issues should be accessible without a cost.
They provide mail IDs, a portal, and contact numbers for assistance.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
Splitting CloudFormation into multiple formations results in changes to resources like API gateway URLs and Cognito pools, which causes issues, especially when trying to maintain consistency across resources.
Adjusting capacity and functionality is a fundamental use.
Terraform runs when changes occur.
Scalability is effective, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
A couple of years ago, the performance was not as good as it is now, but there are noticeable backend improvements.
It has been reliable and efficient in all my deployments.
Data loss can occur when splitting or scaling applications due to changes in resources.
I can choose a stable version and decide whether to upgrade based on its performance.
Stability has been a concern, particularly around backside stability with unexpected terminations.
Once the configuration is set, there are generally no significant stability issues.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
It presents challenges for users unfamiliar with coding, posing as a barrier to fully utilizing CloudFormation.
Creating microservices and connecting multiple APIs into a single API gateway can be challenging; documentation should address specific needs.
There are potential improvements in the backend stability of HashiCorp Terraform.
How quickly can it be integrated into my Terraform scripts ensuring rapid availability of resources is crucial.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
AWS CloudFormation is free.
I use the open-source version of Terraform, so there is no cost for me.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
I can see the entire infrastructure and its connections through code.
Managing, maintaining, and deploying become easier as it allows the creation of the same resources on multiple accounts, making it efficient for infrastructure management.
Terraform modules make it easier to manage complex infrastructure and code within an organization.
Terraform's infrastructure as a code tool facilitates deploying code on tools, and once configured with AWS and local Terraform systems, it can be reused multiple times without much issue.
If changes are needed, I track who did what because my Terraform scripts are version-controlled.
Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.
Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.
AWS CloudFormation provides a common language for you to model and provision AWS and third party application resources in your cloud environment. AWS CloudFormation allows you to use programming languages or a simple text file to model and provision, in an automated and secure manner, all the resources needed for your applications across all regions and accounts. This gives you a single source of truth for your AWS and third party resources.
HashiCorp Terraform is a powerful configuration management solution that aims to provide users with the ability to maximize the ease with which users can perform their configuration management operations. It makes it so that organizations can reliably configure and manage their infrastructure. Terraform is a tool that transforms every user into an administrator and project collaborator. Businesses that use it have at their command a solution that they can use for the entire lifecycle of their infrastructure.
HashiCorp Terraform Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy HashiCorp Terraform include:
HashiCorp Terraform Features
Reviews from Real Users
HashiCorp Terraform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two significant advantages it offers are its ability to help users create deployment pipelines that make the deployment process simple and its ability to recover infrastructure fully should something delete or damage it.
Patryk G., the chief technology officer at Translucent Computing Inc, writes, “Furthermore, Terraform enables the creation of a deployment pipeline using tools, such as Atlantis, which automates the process of scanning and deploying the code. This streamlines the deployment process and adds features, such as auditing, risk management, and security scanning to the deployment process. Terraform provides a more organized and secure way of managing infrastructure, compared to the traditional ad-hoc method.”
Rakib M., the chief technology and strategy officer at the White House, says, “One of the other major features of terraform is its ability to act as a Disaster Recovery tool. Since terraform is an Infrastructure-As-A-Service tool, it can be used as part of the rest of the DR toolset to restore affected infrastructure to its original state without any variation.”
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.