Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HashiCorp Terraform vs Red Hat Satellite comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Intune saves time and costs by enhancing security, reducing resources, and streamlining operations for efficient management.
Sentiment score
5.5
HashiCorp Terraform reduces operational overhead and increases efficiency through automation, offering significant cost savings and proving worthwhile.
Sentiment score
8.4
Red Hat Satellite enhances ROI by streamlining updates, improving security, saving labor hours, and minimizing configuration errors.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
Applications are deployed through Intune, and we see fewer tickets for common issues because we can resolve them through the solution.
The ROI is substantial because it saves many labor hours and reduces errors in configuration, leading to better services for our customers.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Intune provides quick premium support but basic support can be slow, requiring escalation or third-party assistance.
Sentiment score
6.2
Most users rely on community resources, but some desire faster support and deeper documentation for HashiCorp Terraform.
Sentiment score
7.2
Red Hat support is appreciated for knowledgeable assistance, though some users report delays; forums and meetings improve satisfaction.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
They provide mail IDs, a portal, and contact numbers for assistance.
Red Hat provides one of the best customer support services.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Microsoft Intune efficiently scales for diverse environments, supporting large user bases across multiple devices and operating systems.
Sentiment score
8.8
HashiCorp Terraform is praised for scalability, efficiently managing large infrastructures, suitable for complex and enterprise-level environments.
Sentiment score
7.9
Red Hat Satellite is praised for scalable server management, favored by enterprises for efficiency and minimal administrative time.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
Terraform runs when changes occur.
Scalability is effective, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
It has been deployed with large customers without any scalability problems.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Intune is stable and reliable, with occasional bugs, showing potential for improvements, particularly with network or device challenges.
Sentiment score
7.5
HashiCorp Terraform is generally stable and appreciated for scriptability, but occasional bugs and version issues are noted by users.
Sentiment score
8.1
Red Hat Satellite is praised for its reliability and robust performance, with recommendations to stay one minor version back.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
A couple of years ago, the performance was not as good as it is now, but there are noticeable backend improvements.
We've encountered problems with other services like Exchange, Intune has remained unaffected.
I can choose a stable version and decide whether to upgrade based on its performance.
Stability has been a concern, particularly around backside stability with unexpected terminations.
Once the configuration is set, there are generally no significant stability issues.
The stability of Red Hat Satellite is excellent.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Intune requires improvements in reporting, application deployment, third-party integration, and enhanced security, compliance, and support features.
Terraform needs improved features, intuitive interfaces, better documentation, enhanced security, and more programming capabilities for user-friendliness and flexibility.
Red Hat Satellite needs better integration, usability, automation, and documentation, with improved management, pricing, and compatibility with Ansible and OpenShift.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
There are potential improvements in the backend stability of HashiCorp Terraform.
How quickly can it be integrated into my Terraform scripts ensuring rapid availability of resources is crucial.
Customers still find migrations a complex process.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Intune is cost-effective, especially in Office 365 bundles, offering savings over competitors with negotiable licensing.
HashiCorp Terraform's open-source version is cost-effective, but enterprise plans can be costly, justified by advanced features and scalability.
Red Hat Satellite offers yearly subscriptions with premium support, deemed costly by some but cost-effective for large enterprises.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
We get Intune bundled with our Microsoft agreement.
I use the open-source version of Terraform, so there is no cost for me.
We have won public offers, demonstrating it is a competitive solution in pricing.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration, robust security, and flexible management for diverse devices with comprehensive administration and policy deployment.
HashiCorp Terraform efficiently automates multi-cloud infrastructure provisioning with modularity, ease of use, version control, and strong community support.
Red Hat Satellite offers scalable automation, efficient orchestration, and robust security management with user-friendly GUI and advanced reporting.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Terraform modules make it easier to manage complex infrastructure and code within an organization.
Terraform's infrastructure as a code tool facilitates deploying code on tools, and once configured with AWS and local Terraform systems, it can be reused multiple times without much issue.
If changes are needed, I track who did what because my Terraform scripts are version-controlled.
Complex configurations for upgrades and application patches are handled expertly with Red Hat Satellite.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
238
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
HashiCorp Terraform
Ranking in Configuration Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Satellite
Ranking in Configuration Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 10.1%, up from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HashiCorp Terraform is 3.3%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Satellite is 10.2%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Joseph Merusi - PeerSpot reviewer
Everything has worked better since we started using it
Sometimes the syncing is inconsistent. I'm confident that the devices are checking in every eight hours, but sometimes the devices aren't picking up the settings as quickly as I would expect. Some features haven't been updated in a while, and Microsoft doesn't seem interested in developing them. Unless you talk to an engineer, you don't know whether there will be an update. There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now. Some reporting areas still need development. For example, I noticed that the reporting for driver updates is still confusing.
Eugene Paden - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensures consistency and security in deployments while adapting to resource availability
The most valuable feature is predictability. When I need to put something, it is repeatable. I can deploy it in one environment, change the parameter, and it will work in another. If changes are needed, I track who did what because my Terraform scripts are version-controlled. This reduces guesswork and trial and error from the UI, replacing it with code, which enhances maintainability. In cloud environments, manual configurations can be forgotten or misunderstood if the original person leaves, but Terraform ensures documentation and consistent configurations.
JonathanShilling - PeerSpot reviewer
A good product for managing patches and updates that could be more robust and up-to-date
I do not really notice anything in the product that is a glaring omission or that absolutely needs to be added. There is always room for improvement, no matter what software package you are using. I would say the room for improvement to me would be to include more diversity in what it can deploy. Right now, it is specifically for Red Hat products. Being able to deploy other products would be a benefit. For example, say if you have Ubuntu running in your network. Being able to deploy packages for Ubuntu with Red Hat Satellite for that product would be nice and would give you more of a single pane of glass solution. Having a centralized repository for your Windows patching would be nice. SCCM is a much more expensive solution than Satellite. You have got the licensing issues and all that wonderful stuff to go through. Satellite is a pretty robust solution in handling its responsibilities. Although I really have not gone through it enough to tell you all the little quirks, it would be nice to see its capabilities expanded.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
What do you like most about HashiCorp Terraform?
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the modules it offers.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HashiCorp Terraform?
I use the open-source version of Terraform, so there is no cost for me. There is a paid version available for clients...
What needs improvement with HashiCorp Terraform?
The area for improvement is the speed at which resources become available. When a new resource is introduced in AWS o...
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management h...
What do you like most about Red Hat Satellite?
The product's most valuable feature is its ability to process patching and updates completely offline without an inte...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Satellite?
The cost is perceived as reasonable as our customers continue to purchase the solutions. We have won public offers, d...
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
Terraform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Information Not Available
Baloise Bank SoBa, ETH Zurich, Munich Airport, ING-DiBa, Produban
Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp Terraform vs. Red Hat Satellite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.