Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Step Functions vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Step Functions support is effective and responsive for error fixes and quotas but considered expensive by users.
Sentiment score
8.5
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers responsive support with varying service levels, but documentation and response times need improvement.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
AWS Step Functions needs better data handling, IDE integration, pricing clarity, third-party integration, and improved profiling and logging features.
Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform requires improved error handling, scalability, support, integration options, and enhanced performance, security, and pricing flexibility.
MuleSoft is considered expensive, so pricing is a major concern.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Step Functions are praised for scalability and performance by diverse teams, from startups to large companies with 4,000 users.
Sentiment score
7.6
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is highly scalable and suited for enterprises, but requires investment for optimal performance and integration.
MuleSoft provides the ability to scale, yet it is costly to do so.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
AWS Step Functions pricing can be complex and expensive, impacting costs through multiple factors and integrations, with inconsistent price control.
Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's high pricing challenges small businesses despite benefits, though a pay-as-you-go model may improve accessibility.
MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Step Functions are highly stable and reliable, with many users experiencing no issues, often rating stability 8.5-10.
Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is stable and reliable, but connector issues and external factors may affect its consistency.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.2
AWS Step Functions offer intuitive JSON workflows, full AWS integration, parallel task scalability, effective monitoring with a dashboard-like UI.
Sentiment score
8.1
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management, offering easy integration, visual design, scalability, and seamless microservices support.
The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions
Ranking in Workload Automation
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (12th)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Workload Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Mahender Nirwan - PeerSpot reviewer
Good integration with many AWS services and create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features
There are two main features I like. You can use the UI or write basic JSON to define the workflow. If you write JSON, it converts it into a visual workflow in the UI. This allows you to visualize what's happening. When you get an error, it's easy to find in any large workflow, and debugging is also pretty easy. I like their UI, to be honest. It has the best profit UI.
Corydon Hinton - PeerSpot reviewer
Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results
Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
5%
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?
The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.
What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?
I worked with Step Functions about a year ago for six months. Currently, I don't have any use cases for Step Functions. But overall, I was pretty amazed with it. It has great integration with many ...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?
I would rate my experience with this product a ten out of ten. Step Functions obviously cannot solve every problem statement. But it makes sense for a wide range of use cases. Everything has some l...
What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
 

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions
Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.