Barracuda Email Protection vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server comparison

Barracuda Networks and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Email Security category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.6, while Kaspersky is ranked #32 with an average rating of 6.7. Barracuda Networks holds a 3.7% mindshare in Email Security, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Email Protection

Read 19 Barracuda Email Protection reviews

3,238 Views
2,655 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Read 8 Kaspersky Security for Mail Server reviews

917 Views
688 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Barracuda Email Protection

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 19, 2026

Barracuda Email Protection and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server are competitive products in email security. Barracuda seems to have the upper hand in pricing and deployment ease, while Kaspersky leads in advanced security features and data protection.

Features: Barracuda offers comprehensive threat filters, automated backup solutions, and strong email archiving capabilities. Kaspersky provides advanced malware detection, real-time threat intelligence, and integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls.

Room for Improvement: Barracuda could improve its reporting features, integration with different platforms, and flexibility in policy creation. Kaspersky can enhance its deployment process to be more straightforward and improve accessibility for less technically inclined users. The pricing structure could be more competitive to appeal to smaller businesses.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda offers a user-friendly deployment model with strong customer support, suitable for businesses of all sizes. Kaspersky, although more complex to deploy, provides thorough technical support and comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Barracuda is noted for cost-effectiveness and solid ROI with lower initial setup costs. Kaspersky, while potentially more expensive upfront, offers ROI through advanced security features that benefit security-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,103 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Email Protection

Ranking in Email Security

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Archiving (3rd), Security Incident Response (9th), Office 365 Protection (4th)

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Ranking in Email Security

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Email Protection is 3.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Barracuda Email Protection	3.7%
Kaspersky Security for Mail Server	0.6%
Other	95.7%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

Sherif Fouad

Group ICT Manager at a mining and metals company with 501-1,000 employees

Have raised concerns about scanning engines and automation while continuing to rely on layered protection strategies

Incident response is something that requires more development from Barracuda's side. Regarding room for improvement for Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response, for the product, developing or improving the scanning engine is important, but it's a bit tricky. I know that they are working on it heavily. The difference between Barracuda and Sophos is Sophos focused heavily on cybersecurity while Barracuda tried to increase their product portfolio. Sometimes, in some cases, this might end up with their teams being unfocused or a bit thin and stretched and super busy. However, there is room for improvement. The product is great. The teams that are supporting are great. But there is always room for improvement. Even if you have a product that you would give a rating of 10 out of 10, there is always room for improvement. The day we stop improving is the day we die. Regarding the scanning engine, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response has a very good feature where you can create automated flows for how to handle specific emails that are detected as incidents. This needs a bit of an improvement. That's the only component of Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response that I believe requires improvement.

Read full review

Zia Syed

Systems Specialist/ Administrator at ALFA International Company Limited.

User interface updates needed but achieves cost savings and threat protection

We are using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server to enhance our email system’s security and protect against threats Kaspersky Security for Mail Server handles spam and phishing attempts well. I have not experienced any spam issues. Its malware detection effectively manages the security of our…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We now have a secondary backup of Office 365 that's much easier to retrieve compared to Microsoft. If someone deletes something in Office 365, we can get it back within Office 365, but it's difficult. Barracuda is much easier. There is a lot less management needed using Barracuda. The management becomes much easier for Office 365 and it's no longer on-prem, so there are fewer hours managing on-prem devices, servers, and things of that nature. We don't have network appliances anymore for the backup of our information."

"The most helpful aspect for me is the out-of-the-box configuration, which is fairly good."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"I would rate the solution nine out of ten."

"When we got the service, it included the email archiver with unlimited storage."

"The most valuable features of Barracuda Email Protection are flexibility and customization."

"The best feature of Barracuda Email Protection is that it provides protection for Microsoft 365."

"The archiving and search features are very good."

More Barracuda Email Protection pros

"You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail."

"The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it."

"The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities."

"Kaspersky Security for Mail Server provides protection against email spams and blacklisted emails which are suspicious, making it a good product."

"The most valuable feature is the straightforward setup."

"We have achieved cost savings of up to thirty percent by using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server."

"I find the product valuable because it provides easy integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution."

Cons

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"The customer service and support could be improved if the support were available directly in Europe. Currently, the support is often managed from India, so we sometimes need to wait due to the time zone difference. It would be quicker and better if the support were provided by European staff."

"They could simplify the licensing and the pricing."

"Sometimes it is somewhat laggy, especially on the Archiver side. It should have improved performance on their Message Archiver."

"Barracuda Essentials can improve by continually adding more features."

"Two to three months back, we got fraudulent emails in which someone in the organization was being blamed."

"I would like to see some additional functionality in terms of employee monitoring, as part of a work-from-home security solution."

"Sometimes, in some cases, this might end up with their teams being unfocused or a bit thin and stretched and super busy."

More Barracuda Email Protection cons

"I have only made contact via email, and it is a little slow. I would give customer service a rating of six or seven. Improving Spanish support would greatly benefit users."

"The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license."

"Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

"Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users."

"I rated the overall solution a five out of ten. If a user is looking for a low-budget solution with mid-level security without AI features, Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is suitable."

"The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement."

"It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"We didn't have to pay a lot for the solution because we got it from a good vendor with a good user volume."

"The price of Barracuda Essentials is better than some of the competing products."

"The price is similar to that of Microsoft 365."

"The solution's pricing is moderate, where it is neither cheap nor expensive."

"We pay annually. They never charged us for anything else. And they were quite a bit under that $20,000 mark. It was $19,074. And they've been pretty good about not skyrocketing the price or anything like that. It has gone up. It's gone up to $24,000 in 2020."

"Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers to easily buy the solution."

"Price-wise, this product is middle-of-the-road."

More Barracuda Email Protection pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."

"My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Barracuda Email Protection?

Barracuda Email Protection is easy to deploy and maintain. It doesn't require a specialized resource to manage this tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Email Protection?

Their list price is too high, but in India, the selling price is affordable at around $10 per user per year. Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Email Protection?

Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings. For instance, for email quarantine, I can't se...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

The pricing is moderate. It is not expensive but not cheap either. For Mexico, a good price is about 20 dollars per agent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

Regarding Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, I have not compared with other solutions, but I will compare and provide feedback. It is a reliable and fast security solution, and I can say it blocks...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

I work on a mail protection service, specifically Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. I work with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server.

See all answers

Comparisons

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 17% of the time

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More Barracuda Email Protection Competitors

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 12% of the time

Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Collaboration Security vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection

February 2026

Download Barracuda Email Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

January 2026

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report

Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Essentials, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response

No data available

Overview

Barracuda Email Protection provides advanced security with features like AI protection and cloud-based spam blocking, making it essential for managing email risks effectively.

Barracuda Email Protection stands out with its robust malware detection, ease of use, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, serving enterprises by simplifying email threat management. Despite its efficient spam filtering and straightforward setup, users seek improvements in email encryption, third-party vendor integration, report details, and more streamlined performance. Organizations leverage its AI capabilities for phishing detection and employee training, allowing for automated operations and comprehensive threat protection. Its archiving, search, and hands-off management are crucial for companies lacking extensive security resources, ensuring persistent email access and secure practices.

What are the key features of Barracuda Email Protection?

Cloud-Based Spam Blocking: Reduces unwanted emails effectively.
Impersonation Detection: Identifies phishing attempts seamlessly.
Malware Detection: Protects against malicious threats.
AI Protection: Enhances security with intelligent analysis.
Microsoft 365 Integration: Ensures smooth operation within existing systems.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security protocols.

What are the main benefits and ROI of Barracuda Email Protection?

Time Savings: Automates and streamlines email management processes.
Email Security: Maintains domain reputation by reducing spam and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Provides a unified approach to email threats.
Central Management: Simplifies oversight with a unified console.
Reliable Support: Offers technical assistance and guidance.

In finance, healthcare, and large enterprises, Barracuda Email Protection is deployed for its reliable email archiving and retrieval, supporting compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its AI-powered phishing detection and employee training tools, enhancing operational security and reducing risk exposure.

Barracuda Networks

Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

ACT Government, Acumen Group, AGIP, Delta Dental Plans Association, Desai/Nasr Consulting Engineers, Inc., Equinox Information Systems

Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

February 2026

Free Report: Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Email Protection vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.