Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (34th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is designed for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and holds a mindshare of 3.4%, down 3.4% compared to last year.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 0.3% mindshare, down 0.4% since last year.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Kevin Mabry - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 26, 2024
Provides telemetry, risk assessment, and behavior monitoring
I like the risk assessment tool built into Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because I'm really into risk assessments and vulnerability testing. I think that is crucial and needed, and I don't see that often with most EDRs. The telemetry I get from the tool can be used in a SOC I use. The solution has behavior monitoring that allows you to monitor people's specific behaviour and practices. You can then ask the person to stop or start doing something. You can also do application management and access management. You can do many things within Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because it is like a one-stop shop scenario.
CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 22, 2022
Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection
I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."
"Great protection against malware, ransomware, and any other forms of malicious software."
"The performance is great."
"I like that you can manage all the time and you can uninstall and install everything via the web console."
"I have access to it from anywhere."
"It is easy to scale and it is suitable for organizations from small businesses to enterprise."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"I haven't had a problem with its stability yet. Since we deployed it, we haven't had one computer instance where we had to reimage the computer due to the virus."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection allows our organization's clients to be managed and inventoried remotely."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"Containment is the best feature of the solution."
 

Cons

"The pricing should be improved. The user interface has been improved on a yearly basis. The key issue is that they need to look at their pricing."
"Areas for improvement would be performance and pricing."
"Other solutions are cheaper than GravityZone."
"The product can be improved by identifying errors."
"They should include the Hebrew language for its technical support in terms of communication."
"The outreach from support was a bit bad according to their plan, but we've got two people here that manage and support GravityZone and interact with them and they manage it very well."
"The on-premises setup for Bitdefender sometimes faces issues with connectivity. Management of Windows Defender is a bit easier compared to Bitdefender."
"If we could directly push the agent to the script, it'll be very good."
"The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, we have a better licensing agreement with Bitdefender than we did with competing vendors."
"The product has a reasonable price."
"There is a fully functional trial that we used and we didn't have any issues."
"It is not that expensive. Compared to its competitors, it is well-priced and well-placed."
"The licensing cost has been manageable for our small team."
"The price is per license per endpoint. The price is different for everyone, but we find the price is cheap for us."
"There are different packages available that vary in terms of licensing fees."
"It has a suitable price for every company and organization."
"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."
"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."
"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."
"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."
"It's a cost-effective solution"
"The price of this product should be lower."
"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
They need to improve the dashboard by adding a dedicated executive view. This view should provide executives with a clear overview of what's happening. Also, the UI needs to be more user-friendly, ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
It's a cost-effective solution. I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is one of the best endpoint protection solutions for enterprises.
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved. The vendor can improve the DLP offerings. The solution provider should work on localizing the GDPR regulations, which Microsoft ...
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Bitdefender GravityZone
Comodo AEP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mentor Graphics, Rudersdal Kommune
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.