We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is commended for its extensive cross-platform protection, user-friendly interface, and compatibility with third-party software. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers comprehensive detection capabilities and an advanced management interface. It is known for its easy setup, scalability, and reasonable pricing. Kaspersky users requested improvements in security and stability. They also want better documentation, faster malware scanning, enhanced encryption, and improved remote management. The reviews suggest that Bitdefender GravityZone EDR can improve by adding a built-in firewall, optimizing deployment, and enhancing encryption.
Service and Support: Users say that Kaspersky’s support is helpful and responsive, whether it comes from resellers, partners, or the vendor. Opinions are divided about Bitdefender's customer service, with some users reporting prompt and helpful assistance and others experiencing responses and an overwhelming amount of emails.
Ease of Deployment: Some reported that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is straightforward to setup, while others find it more complex and time-consuming. Users say Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is straightforward to set up, and deployment can be completed in less than a day.
Pricing: Users gave mixed feedback on the price of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Some found it reasonable while others thought it was expensive. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR’s licensing is considered reasonable, and contract lengths are flexible. There may be additional charges for extra features or services.
ROI: Our reviewers said that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has proven to be a solid investment. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers varied ROI based on different situations.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business over Bitdefender GravityZone EDR . Kaspersky provides extensive protection across various platforms and systems, offering features like web filtering, email filtering, and anomaly control. Users find it simple to deploy and use, with high detection rates and minimal impact on system resources. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR requires improvements in encryption.
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The stability is very good."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is a very stable solution."
"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR needs to be more stable."
"The solution's deployment is very easy and flexible."
"The installation is straightforward."
"I like that you can manage all the time and you can uninstall and install everything via the web console."
"The advanced direct control on offer is excellent."
"With Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, we don't have to worry about our endpoints or attacks. Our security has become stronger. This has been a reliable solution for our company."
"It's a very stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data."
"We have over 1,000 users using the solution in our organization and the solution has been able to handle it."
"First of all, I like that it's perfect against malware threats and behavior analysis along with signature analysis. That's the key point for me."
"Deployment and centralized management are essential for us because of the number of loads that we have along with the number of geographic locations where we are based."
"I have found the most useful features to be protected against viruses, mail threats, encryption of the devices, and MDM. There are a lot of features."
"I have found the security, device, web and application controls to be the most valuable features."
"It is very efficient. I like its simplicity."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"The support needs improvement."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Detections could be improved."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"In the future, maybe this will need to morph into AI threat intelligence."
"The stability must be improved."
"The main area for improvement is the dashboard of the cloud console, where we manage security policies and groupings. It needs to be more flexible and informative."
"The cryptosystem could be improved a bit."
"Technical support could be faster and more responsive."
"I would like to see a remote desktop for installed endpoints so administrators can see what is on a user's screen or what a user is doing."
"There is a need to work on the deployment, when it comes to deploying to Windows machines with regards to downloading the size of the package."
"Application Control should be available on the cloud."
"I would like for Kaspersky to generate reports when it detects issues such as malware."
"They're restricted to endpoint protection for now, I'd like to see some additional products."
"It is not very good for the performance of the system, and especially with older devices, it has a noticeable impact."
"When we connect to the solutions' website they block out our VPN connection. This causes us some difficulties."
"The installation is technical. You need to be certified."
"The solution could be more secure."
"There are some features built into Kaspersky that do not work at all, so we have to use other products instead."
"The product must improve its price to suit small and mid-size enterprises."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 14th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 111 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Micro Apex One. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.