Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Bitdefender and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #50. Bitdefender holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

Read 31 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reviews

1,958 Views
1,899 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

2,266 Views
2,039 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security compete in the endpoint security market. Bitdefender appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive protection capabilities.

Features: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security shines with features like a comprehensive firewall, behavior analytics, and ransomware protection, along with remote administration capabilities and seamless cloud integration. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is known for its low resource usage, powerful cloud console, and ease of deployment with auto-remediation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could improve by reducing false positives, enhancing reporting, and offering more granular file scanning. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security needs improvements in user interface, addressing connectivity issues with its controller, and support for low-RAM devices. Detailed management demands and performance impacts are also areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer hybrid cloud and on-premises deployment options. OpenText excels in cloud deployment across various environments, while Bitdefender supports extensive public cloud integration. OpenText’s customer service is inconsistent, with mixed user experiences. Bitdefender tends to receive positive feedback, though response times and support for complex queries can be improved.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides cost-effective solutions with competitive endpoint pricing, appealing to businesses of different sizes. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a modular pricing structure tailored to specific security needs. Although Bitdefender's pricing can vary, its comprehensive features potentially enhance ROI, warranting a careful cost-benefit analysis for additional modules.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtualization Security (4th)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

50th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security	0.9%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.2%
Other	97.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed

CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC

Delivers lightweight protection while facing challenges with technical aspects

I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portions to remote GUI-based interfaces. The Command Line Interface (CLI) is not improving. Even experienced personnel are finding it difficult. There is a power user function where you can stop it temporarily for installing applications. Previously, we had the option to click on the power user button and enter the password to allow stopping that particular function. Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand. Currently, everything is working fine except for the technical aspects we can control. If they can revert to the old system, that would be much better. When we raise this issue with Bitdefender, they cite security reasons for the change. However, while Cisco is moving away from CLI to GUI, Bitdefender is moving backward. Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The centralized GravityZone console is straightforward to use."

"It takes lesser energy from the system than the rest. So, we tried it for five years, and it works quite well. So we have continued with it. And the pricing is competitive as well."

"The tool has a firewall module to control traffic. It also has a feature to map incidents and provide information about attackers and the environment."

"The installation is easy and it takes approximately a few hours. We are deploying it from a Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) tool. All you need to do is click on it and the installation is complete."

"I like its unified interface, which also helps you scan Outlook email, for example. Multiple products can be standardized across endpoints or the EDR solution, and the integrations with SIEMs."

"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."

"The product offers an opportunity to monitor the things happening in our network. It also has a comprehensive dashboard."

"What I appreciate most about Bitdefender are its web content filtering, blocking malicious sites, and its ability to thwart brute force attacks on open ports."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pros

"Low performance requirements."

"Auto-Remediation"

"The solution is very simple and straightforward to use."

"It is very light. It is the only solution that can be installed on a machine that already has an antivirus. It is a pretty complete solution."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"The initial setup should be made easier."

"At this point in time, the download footprint is a bit big."

"Potential areas for improvement could be more accessible and immediate support for critical situations, especially considering the regulatory challenges in healthcare."

"Because we bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security via Rectron as a distributor, they need to upskill their distributors."

"There are compatibility concerns as Bitdefender does not support Windows 7."

"The price of the bandwidth here is very expensive compared to European countries."

"The dashboard can be improved."

"The price has increased marginally recently and I would prefer if they didn't raise rates."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security cons

"Reporting system could be improved."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"We need more control over when upgrades to the app are rolled out."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Good in terms of pricing and flexibility."

"The license is yearly."

"It has very flexible licensing costs, and it's modular-based."

"In India, licensing is based on annual contracts. It's not extremely expensive, but not the cheapest either. I'd rate it somewhere around seven or eight out of ten."

"We pay for an annual license which is affordable."

"The tool is not expensive and pricing is competitive."

"You don't have to pay extra after buying the product."

"The pricing is reasonable when I compare it to other security solutions, particularly Kaspersky, it stands out. It offers an excellent solution at a more favorable price point."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"The pricing is high."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"It is relatively cheap."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Maintaining Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has been smooth. We receive regular notifications about upgrades, and the process has been successful without issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Because we bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security via Rectron as a distributor, they need to upskill their distributors. When we were deploying, the Rectron people did not know much, an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

We primarily bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for endpoint protection. We needed an endpoint protection solution that covered everything we required, and the pricing was also a fa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

See all answers

Comparisons

GravityZone Business Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 7% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 29% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

February 2026

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security report

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

January 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect businesses from advanced threats. It offers a wide range of features, including endpoint protection, network security, and advanced threat intelligence. With its centralized management console, administrators can easily deploy and manage security policies across all endpoints.

The solution also includes advanced anti-malware and anti-ransomware capabilities, as well as web filtering and application control. Additionally, GravityZone Enterprise Security provides real-time visibility and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents.

With its robust security features and user-friendly interface, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is an ideal choice for businesses looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Bitdefender

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

February 2026

Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.