Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Bitdefender and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0. Bitdefender holds a 1.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

Read 31 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reviews

1,835 Views
1,780 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

2,040 Views
1,816 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security compete in the endpoint security market. Bitdefender appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive protection capabilities.

Features: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security shines with features like a comprehensive firewall, behavior analytics, and ransomware protection, along with remote administration capabilities and seamless cloud integration. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is known for its low resource usage, powerful cloud console, and ease of deployment with auto-remediation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could improve by reducing false positives, enhancing reporting, and offering more granular file scanning. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security needs improvements in user interface, addressing connectivity issues with its controller, and support for low-RAM devices. Detailed management demands and performance impacts are also areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer hybrid cloud and on-premises deployment options. OpenText excels in cloud deployment across various environments, while Bitdefender supports extensive public cloud integration. OpenText’s customer service is inconsistent, with mixed user experiences. Bitdefender tends to receive positive feedback, though response times and support for complex queries can be improved.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides cost-effective solutions with competitive endpoint pricing, appealing to businesses of different sizes. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a modular pricing structure tailored to specific security needs. Although Bitdefender's pricing can vary, its comprehensive features potentially enhance ROI, warranting a careful cost-benefit analysis for additional modules.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,078 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

27th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtualization Security (4th)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security	1.0%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed

CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC

Delivers lightweight protection while facing challenges with technical aspects

I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portions to remote GUI-based interfaces. The Command Line Interface (CLI) is not improving. Even experienced personnel are finding it difficult. There is a power user function where you can stop it temporarily for installing applications. Previously, we had the option to click on the power user button and enter the password to allow stopping that particular function. Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand. Currently, everything is working fine except for the technical aspects we can control. If they can revert to the old system, that would be much better. When we raise this issue with Bitdefender, they cite security reasons for the change. However, while Cisco is moving away from CLI to GUI, Bitdefender is moving backward. Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Virus scan and the ability to remotely install are valuable features. Being able to manage everything in one place and set different policies and rules for different computer types are very useful features. It also has ransomware protection. It is very simple to use, and it is very effective."

"It is perfectly stable. We haven't received any complaints from customers regarding stability or performance. It's been smooth sailing so far."

"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."

"Since implementing Bitdefender, the traffic to the firewall has significantly reduced, and network congestion has been resolved."

"The most valuable features of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security are remote administration and deployment, comprehensive firewall protection, malware protection, and antivirus."

"The features I found most valuable in Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security include anti-malware, spyware detection, firewall, network detection, and user behavior analytics. The solution also gives you a heads-up about operating system misconfiguration."

"I like its unified interface, which also helps you scan Outlook email, for example. Multiple products can be standardized across endpoints or the EDR solution, and the integrations with SIEMs."

"It is very easy to configure and deploy."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pros

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"It could be simplified a little bit for firewall rules and blocking specific IP addresses. It would be nice to have an option to upload a CSV or XLSX file of IP addresses to be blacklisted or to be able to specify a range as attempted logins from botnets and people attempting to access network accounts is an increasing issue across the board."

"The phishing feature report showed zero results, and the patch management component is one of the two main issues that need improvement."

"The security features as per customers' requirements should be improved."

"I like the Application Control feature, but it's a bit tricky. Managing it can be a bit cumbersome sometimes."

"There are compatibility concerns as Bitdefender does not support Windows 7."

"The dashboard can be improved."

"At this point in time, the download footprint is a bit big."

"The tool needs to improve patch and vulnerability management."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security cons

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonable and is nominally priced in accordance with the features that offer to the market."

"The tool is not expensive and pricing is competitive."

"The product's pricing is okay and it is yearly."

"Its price has gone up since our last renewal. My renewal fee has gone from $517.99 in 2018 for 3 years to $739.99 when it renews this year in July. I love the product, but a price increase of over 40% is a bit exorbitant."

"The license is yearly."

"In India, licensing is based on annual contracts. It's not extremely expensive, but not the cheapest either. I'd rate it somewhere around seven or eight out of ten."

"The tool's pricing structure is good. We use an annual subscription."

"We purchase the solution for three or five-year intervals. We paid approximately $150 for 10 to 15 users."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,078 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Maintaining Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has been smooth. We receive regular notifications about upgrades, and the process has been successful without issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Because we bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security via Rectron as a distributor, they need to upskill their distributors. When we were deploying, the Rectron people did not know much, an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

We primarily bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for endpoint protection. We needed an endpoint protection solution that covered everything we required, and the pricing was also a fa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Comparisons

GravityZone Business Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

Norton Small Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 7% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 23% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

January 2026

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security report

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

January 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect businesses from advanced threats. It offers a wide range of features, including endpoint protection, network security, and advanced threat intelligence. With its centralized management console, administrators can easily deploy and manage security policies across all endpoints.

The solution also includes advanced anti-malware and anti-ransomware capabilities, as well as web filtering and application control. Additionally, GravityZone Enterprise Security provides real-time visibility and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents.

With its robust security features and user-friendly interface, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is an ideal choice for businesses looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Bitdefender

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,078 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.