Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Bitdefender and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.3, while Seqrite is ranked #42. Bitdefender holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and Seqrite Endpoint Security compete in the endpoint protection category. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and ease of deployment.

Features: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat protection, centralized management, and robust reporting. Seqrite Endpoint Security includes ease of use, strong malware detection, and efficient resource utilization. Users generally consider Bitdefender's features to be more advanced.

Room for Improvement: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security could benefit from enhanced troubleshooting documentation, reduced system resource usage, and more frequent updates. Seqrite Endpoint Security can improve customer support response times, offer more frequent updates, and streamline its user interface. Bitdefender's users note documentation needs, while Seqrite's users focus on support enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is known for its straightforward deployment process and effective customer service. Seqrite Endpoint Security also offers smooth deployment, though users feel customer support could be faster. Both products are strong in deployment, but Bitdefender is favored for better customer service feedback.

Pricing and ROI: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is perceived to have higher pricing, justified by its features and performance. Seqrite Endpoint Security is more affordable with a quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs. Seqrite is preferred for cost-effectiveness, although Bitdefender is recognized for long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security	0.9%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	0.9%
Other	94.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Rias Majeed

CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC

Delivers lightweight protection while facing challenges with technical aspects

I have been working with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for quite a long time, but recently, I do not appreciate their changes, especially on the technical side. They moved some portions to remote GUI-based interfaces. The Command Line Interface (CLI) is not improving. Even experienced personnel are finding it difficult. There is a power user function where you can stop it temporarily for installing applications. Previously, we had the option to click on the power user button and enter the password to allow stopping that particular function. Now, we have to do it via CLI, which even technical personnel struggle to understand. Currently, everything is working fine except for the technical aspects we can control. If they can revert to the old system, that would be much better. When we raise this issue with Bitdefender, they cite security reasons for the change. However, while Cisco is moving away from CLI to GUI, Bitdefender is moving backward. Normal users cannot handle these CLI operations effectively.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is the best solution for avoiding security breaches, malware attacks, and other kinds of security issues."

"It is an easy-to-use tool."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"I recognize that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is one of the best products in its category regarding capabilities."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"You will always have a backup copy of any policy the Bitdefender user defines."

"Since implementing Bitdefender, the traffic to the firewall has significantly reduced, and network congestion has been resolved."

"Protection is the most valuable feature."

"Based on my experience, I rate Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security a nine out of ten."

"It is very easy to configure and deploy."

"My advice to others looking into implementing Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is that it's a cost-effective system and it's quite reliable."

"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."

"I would highly recommend this solution; it is very easy to use, and it provides top-notch service, and I haven't had any issues with it."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pros

"The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection."

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable features are the file activity monitors, DLP solutions, and application controls."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"In case it works, we are looking to use features like USB blocking, file upload alerts, and other antivirus features as well, but this software has to work first."

"With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"I feel that it should not be a licensed activity because a feature should allow us to see applications running on end devices."

"On the pricing aspect, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks needs to have a more reasonable rate, particularly for customers in Sri Lanka and Asian countries."

"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The security features as per customers' requirements should be improved."

"The tool needs to improve patch and vulnerability management."

"At this point in time, the download footprint is a bit big."

"The dashboard can be improved."

"To be honest, this makes me miss Panda."

"We've experienced multiple failures during appliance upgrades, sometimes requiring us to resort to backup."

"My main concern is that it's a bit heavy for some devices. Like Kaspersky or McAfee, it uses more RAM or memory. Similar to that, it causes issues for users and their own resources, similar to that. If you deploy on old legacy devices with only 1GB of RAM, then it could be a problem."

"There are issues with macOS or Linux, and the patch management should take care of apart from Windows, Apple and other operating systems."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security cons

"When we fire any employee connected remotely over the internet, we need a security feature that blocks the system and the device."

"I would like to see Seqrite add a remote profile so we can implement different policies for users connecting to the in-office LAN and those accessing the office network from home or a public internet connection."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"User management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks."

"A handbook of known issues and quick fixes should be given so that troubleshooting and frustration are less."

"The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"I am using the Community edition."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"It has a yearly renewal."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"In terms of the licensing costs associated with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, the agreement was made nearly three years ago, but from what I recall, the figure was around €6,000 to €7,000 for three years, including support for two hundred endpoints."

"The tool is not expensive and pricing is competitive."

"It has very flexible licensing costs, and it's modular-based."

"In India, licensing is based on annual contracts. It's not extremely expensive, but not the cheapest either. I'd rate it somewhere around seven or eight out of ten."

"Its price has gone up since our last renewal. My renewal fee has gone from $517.99 in 2018 for 3 years to $739.99 when it renews this year in July. I love the product, but a price increase of over 40% is a bit exorbitant."

"The product's pricing is okay and it is yearly."

"There are many licensing options available, we have been on monthly agreements and other volume contract agreements."

"The license is yearly."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"As per the suggestions from one of the experts we know, it is advisable to make a proper comparison with the local vendors instead of solely relying on online prices, which are often higher and quite expensive."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Maintaining Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has been smooth. We receive regular notifications about upgra...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

Because we bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security via Rectron as a distributor, they need to upskill thei...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?

We primarily bought Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security for endpoint protection. We needed an endpoint protec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

GravityZone Business Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 8% of the time

TrendAI Deep Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 7% of the time

Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security

October 2026

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security report

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security emphasizes virus scanning, remote administration, and robust threat protection. It is known for its comprehensive management tools and usability, making it optimal for enterprise-level security needs.

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers an advanced array of features tailored for enhancing endpoint protection and business security. Its ease of deployment, lightweight operation, and frequent updates are particularly appreciated by enterprises and Managed Service Providers looking for antivirus services and network monitoring. Despite its pricing and memory usage concerns, its unified interface and diverse integrations add to its usability and scalability. The application control, AI capabilities, and telemetry enhance remote administration and intrusion detection.

What are the key features?

Virus Scan: Efficient malware protection with regular updates.
Remote Administration: Seamless management through a unified interface.
Threat Protection: Comprehensive threat defense that includes ransomware protection.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Detailed insights and risk analytics for informed decision-making.
Diverse Integrations: Including SIEMs for extended functionality and scalability.

What benefits can users expect?

Ease of Deployment: Quick and hassle-free setup for immediate use.
Competitive Pricing: Offers value for money without compromising on features.
High User Confidence: Consistent updates and effective malware protection encourage trust.
Scalability: Suitable for enterprises with diverse IT, software, and business environments.

In the IT industry, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is used for endpoint protection and malware defense, enhancing security and providing antivirus services. Managed Service Providers use it for its application control, AI capabilities, and telemetry, which support remote administration and advanced intrusion detection tailored for software development and enterprise-level services. Its comprehensive features fit IT, software, and business environments, making it a favored choice in business security.

Bitdefender

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.