Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo

Top 10 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Alternatives

Vendor: Bitdefender
4.1 out of 5
Post review

Top Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Bitdefender Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Bitdefender, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with its cloud-native design and AI-driven threat remediation. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security appeals for its light system impact and comprehensive protection. CrowdStrike offers remote flexibility, while Bitdefender attracts cost-sensitive buyers seeking robust security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is user-friendly, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security requires a more significant initial investment, highlighting a distinct pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is user-friendly, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security requires a more significant initial investment, highlighting a distinct pricing difference between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in Windows integration and offers cost-effective ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides superior threat detection and machine learning capabilities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint lacks cross-platform support, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security needs better third-party integrations. Microsoft offers quicker support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs significant setup costs, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has lower setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective initial implementation compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint incurs significant setup costs, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has lower setup costs. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective initial implementation compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in real-time threat detection and AI-driven automation. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides comprehensive security features like firewall and anti-phishing. SentinelOne is easier to deploy, while Bitdefender offers a more extensive security range for enterprises.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. While SentinelOne offers extensive features, Bitdefender is more cost-effective for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. While SentinelOne offers extensive features, Bitdefender is more cost-effective for initial setup.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is recognized for its ease of use, integrated VPN, endpoint security, and reliability. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection, sandboxing, and multi-layered protection. Fortinet is cost-effective with straightforward deployment; Bitdefender requires more setup but provides comprehensive security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR excels in threat detection with advanced analytics, appealing to buyers focused on identifying sophisticated attacks. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone offers comprehensive features like robust endpoint protection and centralized management, catering to those seeking a holistic security solution. Cortex XDR's integration contrasts with Bitdefender’s cost-effectiveness.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features higher initial setup cost while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a lower setup expense. Cortex XDR provides robust threat detection, whereas Bitdefender is known for its simplified deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features higher initial setup cost while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a lower setup expense. Cortex XDR provides robust threat detection, whereas Bitdefender is known for its simplified deployment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers intuitive management and automated threat response, while Bitdefender GravityZone provides comprehensive features and superior malware detection. In comparison, Trend Vision One's integration and deployment ease stand out, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone's detailed deployment process and advanced features justify its higher price.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its relatively low setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is noted for its relatively low setup cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and easy integration, with competitive pricing and solid ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides robust ransomware protection and advanced machine learning, making it worth the higher cost for enhanced features. Each solution targets different priorities in endpoint protection.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences highlight the contrast in the affordability of these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences highlight the contrast in the affordability of these two security solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers affordability, easy integration, and responsive customer service, ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides advanced threat detection and extensive security modules; despite its higher price and complex setup, it ensures a solid long-term investment.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is praised for its low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is recognized for having a slightly higher setup cost but offering comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is praised for its low setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is recognized for having a slightly higher setup cost but offering comprehensive features.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals for its strong malware detection, minimal system impact, and straightforward deployment, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers superior threat intelligence and centralized management, justifying its higher cost with advanced features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in pricing and support, making it a competitive choice for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and comprehensive tools, appealing to those seeking superior features and performance.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a competitive setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Trellix ENS offers robust threat detection and cost-effective pricing, appealing for businesses prioritizing affordability. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security stands out for advanced machine learning and responsive customer service, making it a strong choice for those needing comprehensive features and better support.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) involves higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. Bitdefender offers more economical initial deployment, making it a cost-efficient option for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) involves higher setup costs compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. Bitdefender offers more economical initial deployment, making it a cost-efficient option for businesses.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat protection and swift deployment with strong customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business benefits from seamless Windows integration and cloud features, ideal for organizations invested in Microsoft's ecosystem. Pricing varies based on integration value desired.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly option. Bitdefender's comprehensive security features come at a premium, contrasting with Microsoft's more cost-effective entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly option. Bitdefender's comprehensive security features come at a premium, contrasting with Microsoft's more cost-effective entry point.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes is noted for its simpler pricing model and quicker deployment. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone excels with feature richness and comprehensive security measures. Bitdefender provides higher ROI with advanced security features, while Malwarebytes offers lower setup costs suitable for small to medium-sized enterprises.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Malwarebytes Report
Malwarebytes has a lower setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes has a lower setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher initial expense.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5
Cybereason excels in customer support and straightforward deployment, attracting tech buyers seeking advanced threat detection, automated threat hunting, and quick remediation. In comparison, Bitdefender offers a feature-rich suite with comprehensive endpoint protection, ideal for those valuing extensive anti-malware and centralized policy management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more budget-friendly solution for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more budget-friendly solution for initial deployment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers automated threat detection and in-depth reporting. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels with robust endpoint protection, machine learning-driven threat analysis, and superior vulnerability management. Buyers might prefer Panda for cost-effectiveness, while others choose Bitdefender for comprehensive, advanced threat protection.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, offering more advanced features right out of the box. Bitdefender's lower upfront cost makes it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher initial setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, offering more advanced features right out of the box. Bitdefender's lower upfront cost makes it a more budget-friendly option.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides advanced threat protection and analytics, making it a strong choice for security-focused buyers. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers robust web security and device control, appealing to those valuing user satisfaction and cost-effectiveness.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making Seqrite a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making Seqrite a more budget-friendly option.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides extensive features for advanced threat defense and centralized management, making it a robust choice for enterprises. In comparison, Norton Small Business offers ease of deployment and affordability, appealing to smaller organizations with simpler, more intuitive needs.

Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Norton Small Business Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security generally has a higher setup cost than Norton Small Business, making Norton a more budget-friendly option for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security generally has a higher setup cost than Norton Small Business, making Norton a more budget-friendly option for smaller enterprises.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
Trend Micro ServerProtect offers real-time scanning, malware protection, and ease of integration, appealing with competitive pricing and decent ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security delivers advanced threat defense and superior ransomware protection, compensating its higher cost with advanced features and higher ROI.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting significant cost differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more affordable setup price, highlighting significant cost differences between the two.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers lightweight design and fast scans for minimal disruption. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides comprehensive threat detection and in-depth reporting. Webroot focuses on straightforward use, while Bitdefender offers extensive control and customization for complex environments.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection has an affordable setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection has an affordable setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a higher initial investment.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive reporting tools. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is valued for real-time threat intelligence and quick installation. A tech buyer might choose Bitdefender for its extensive features, while SonicWall appeals with its robust performance and simple management.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to SonicWall Capture Client. SonicWall Capture Client, however, provides a more robust initial security configuration.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in affordability, robust threat detection, and customer support. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced machine learning, behavioral analysis, and versatile deployment. Trend Micro is ideal for those focused on cost-effectiveness, while Bitdefender appeals to those requiring sophisticated, comprehensive security features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection presents a higher initial setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup solution. Trend Micro includes more advanced features, while Bitdefender focuses on affordability without compromising essential functi...
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection presents a higher initial setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup solution. Trend Micro includes more advanced features, while Bitdefender focuses on affordability without compromising essential functi...
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is valued for robust malware detection and a comprehensive dashboard. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers advanced threat intelligence and seamless integration. Bitdefender is more intuitive, while WithSecure provides superior threat detection features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers lower initial setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a moderately higher setup cost, reflecting differing features and deployment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers lower initial setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection has a moderately higher setup cost, reflecting differing features and deployment requirements between the two solutions.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers robust malware detection and ease of management, making it cost-effective with excellent customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum excels in threat intelligence and advanced detection techniques, justifying a higher price with extensive capabilities.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum. Kaspersky is praised for its lower initial expenses.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is known for its robust malware detection, advanced threat protection, and efficient resource usage. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites excels with its comprehensive feature set, including automated updates and strong phishing protection. Bitdefender is praised for straightforward deployment, whereas Trend Micro has more complex installation. Pricing-wise, Bitdefender offers good value, while Trend Micro is seen as worth the investment for its extensive features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites. Trend Micro offers more extensive features but at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites. Trend Micro offers more extensive features but at a higher initial expense.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud
2.3 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection and machine learning. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud provides user-friendly management and faster deployment. Bitdefender requires enhancements in usability, while Seqrite needs better integration. Bitdefender justifies higher costs by features; Seqrite offers transparent pricing and value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud Report
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has relatively high setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud offers more affordable setup fees. Bitdefender provides comprehensive protection features; Seqrite is more budget-friendly with essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has relatively high setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud offers more affordable setup fees. Bitdefender provides comprehensive protection features; Seqrite is more budget-friendly with essential security functionalities.
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
TEHTRIS EPP
1 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
TEHTRIS EPP
1 out of 5

TEHTRIS EPP enhances cybersecurity measures with real-time threat detection and neutralization. Users praise its seamless integration, advanced analytics, and low system impact. Challenges include slow updates, limited documentation, and occasional compatibility issues. Customer support response time could be improved for better user satisfaction and experience.

View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Virtualization Security
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)