Bonita vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Bonitasoft and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bonitasoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. Bonitasoft holds a 3.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,904 Views
2,139 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

502 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bonita

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bonita and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM compete in the business process management space. Bonita has the upper hand in flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM excels in enterprise-level features.

Features: Bonita stands out with ease of customization, open-source offerings, and seamless integration capabilities. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM includes robust integration tools, advanced analytics, and comprehensive process management features.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could benefit from enhanced advanced analytics, better enterprise-level feature support, and increased structured support options. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could improve in reducing complexity, lowering costs for smaller businesses, and increasing the flexibility of its customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita offers straightforward deployment with quick setup and community support. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM provides structured support and extensive resources for deployment, suitable for complex enterprise environments.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita offers lower upfront costs, appealing to smaller businesses seeking favorable ROI. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM requires a higher investment but delivers substantial returns through advanced enterprise capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (10th), Process Automation (12th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bonita is 3.7%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

"Development of forms and flows."

More Bonita pros

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

Cons

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"The dashboard has limited features."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

More Bonita cons

"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

47%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 56% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 17% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 43% of the time

Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 34% of the time

IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 23% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

April 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

March 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

No data available

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

April 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.