Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Temenos Quantum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.8
Organizations using Temenos Quantum report increased development efficiency, cost savings, improved security, seamless integration, and scalable architecture benefits.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow support is effective but inconsistent, with strong documentation aiding users in resolving issues independently.
Sentiment score
5.7
Temenos Quantum's support is generally helpful with a good ticketing system, but response times and experiences vary.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is effective and rated highly for scalability but requires manual adjustments for resource scaling.
Sentiment score
7.0
Temenos Quantum is praised for scalability and performance, supporting 100-1000 users, despite some complexity concerns compared to Flutter or React.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is stable and efficient for moderate use but struggles with heavy data loads and API integration bugs.
Sentiment score
7.5
Temenos Quantum is stable and reliable with frequent updates, but areas like pending applications and front-end need improvement.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs user-friendliness, stability, AI enhancements, better support, and flexibility for complex integrations and large datasets.
Temenos Quantum requires security, interface, and stability enhancements, better integration, faster support, flexible widgets, and improved development tools.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow's pricing is seen as reasonable, especially for small-scale operations, with ratings averaging 6.5-7/10.
Temenos Quantum is costly, with prices ranging from $70,000 to $500,000, though some users find it affordable.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines integration with a low-code interface, boosting scalability, security, and efficiency across diverse systems.
Temenos Quantum is valued for its user-friendliness, customizability, integration, security, and comprehensive mobile and web development features.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (17th)
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
15th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (3rd), Mobile Development Platforms (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets
From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Non Profit
5%
Financial Services Firm
42%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.