BrowserStack vs Testim comparison

BrowserStack and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. BrowserStack holds a 10.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 25 BrowserStack reviews

5,813 Views
4,866 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BrowserStack and Testim are competing products in the software testing solutions category. BrowserStack seems to have the upper hand with its extensive device coverage and strong market presence, while Testim offers advanced AI-driven automation capabilities.

Features: BrowserStack provides real-device testing across numerous platforms, seamless integration with various development environments, and robust performance under high traffic. Testim includes AI-powered test authoring, flexible test maintenance, and self-healing tests to reduce test creation time.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could improve by enhancing its AI automation capabilities, reducing initial setup complexity, and offering more competitive pricing. Testim can benefit from streamlining its deployment process, expanding its device coverage, and improving user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack offers straightforward deployment with strong cloud-based testing support, ensuring fast setup and efficient problem resolution. Testim's deployment, though more complex, includes comprehensive customer support and resources for implementation assistance.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack involves a higher initial investment due to extensive device coverage but provides substantial returns via cross-platform compatibility testing. Testim, while costlier owing to AI capabilities, offers high ROI by decreasing test maintenance efforts and speeding up testing cycles.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Testim

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.4%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

"The integration is very good."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

More BrowserStack pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The product is easy to use."

More Testim pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"We are struggling to do local testing."

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

More BrowserStack cons

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"The price is fine."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 34% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 51% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

April 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

March 2025

Download Testim product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Testim

March 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.