Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

C-Prot Endpoint Security vs Huntress Managed EDR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

C-Prot Endpoint Security
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (87th)
Huntress Managed EDR
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (7th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

C-Prot Endpoint Security and Huntress Managed EDR aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. C-Prot Endpoint Security is designed for Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) and holds a mindshare of 0.0%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
Huntress Managed EDR, on the other hand, focuses on Managed Detection and Response (MDR), holds 10.5% mindshare, up 7.9% since last year.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Use C-Prot Endpoint Security?
Share your opinion
Anto Baharian - PeerSpot reviewer
Never misses anything and has an attractive price point and a simple interface
One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365. For instance, when one of my clients' Microsoft 365 account was breached, Blackpoint identified suspicious activity and disabled the account. It was in Dallas, and we are in California. Blackpoint knew something was wrong there, and they went in and disabled the account. Developing more automated remediation features would elevate them to an MDR level, but I understand that it might affect pricing. They are trying to keep it at a good price point because once they go to MDR, it is probably going to double the price. For now, I find the current features satisfactory, as they continue to add improvements. They have added security awareness training and then log collectors. They are adding pillars as they move along, and I assume they are going to have an option for MDR.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Huntress?
It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.
What needs improvement with Huntress?
There should be more engagement with the MSP group or their largest clients. They should have focus group discussions on what they can do to improve the product. A more transparent way for the supp...
What is your primary use case for Huntress?
We use it for our clients and ourselves. Huntress is a pretty comprehensive platform. Recently, they acquired the security awareness training platform, which helps us to fulfill our clients' needs ...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Google 3. Microsoft 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Netflix 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. LinkedIn 10. Tesla 11. Adobe 12. SAP 13. Oracle 14. IBM15. McKinsey 16. Bain Company 17. Boston Consulting Group 18. KPMG 19. EY 20. Deloitte 21. PwC 22. Accenture 23. Cisco 24. VMware 25. Red Hat 26. SUSE 27. Canonical 28. MongoDB 29. Elastic 30. Datadog 31. New Relic 32. Splunk
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: April 2025.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.