Camunda vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Camunda and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 21.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

23,287 Views
15,350 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 13 IBM Case Foundation reviews

318 Views
257 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Camunda

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM Case Foundation and Camunda compete in workflow automation and business process management. Camunda has the upper hand in adaptability and faster implementation.

Features: IBM Case Foundation offers advanced integration with enterprise systems, excels in complex case scenarios, and provides detailed analytics. Camunda is known for its lightweight deployment, flexibility, and easy integration with environments like microservices and cloud-native architectures.

Room for Improvement: IBM Case Foundation can improve its implementation timeline, user interface design, and accessibility for non-technical users. Camunda could enhance ease of customization for less technical personnel, expand its feature set for enterprise environments, and provide more detailed documentation for advanced configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Case Foundation provides a feature-rich, complex deployment model supported by comprehensive customer service. Camunda offers a streamlined deployment process with swift adaptation but may require more technical expertise for customization, with satisfactory customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Case Foundation involves high upfront costs and aligns with large-scale needs, leading to longer ROI timelines. Camunda offers a subscription pricing model with lower initial expenses and promising ROI, appealing to businesses seeking rapid deployment and cost-effective scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.6%, up from 20.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Nouman Nawaz

Deputy Director - IT(Plans) at DHA Lahore

Mature product in terms of security and stable product

The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."

"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."

"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

More Camunda pros

"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."

"It's very easy."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."

"The only thing is that we can easily track where the application is in the process, from manual to automation."

"The content management is great."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."

"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."

"Camunda needs to improve its user interface for low-code development and provide more user interface options beyond the basic workflow."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"The product must provide more videos and training materials."

"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."

More Camunda cons

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."

"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."

"The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it."

"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The open-source version of the product is free to use."

"We use Camunda's community edition, which is free."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."

"Camunda has a free service as well as a commercial service. We are using the free service."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

15%

Insurance Company

13%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?

A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

It was affordable, but right now, ten years later, the cost of the product is extremely high. That's why we are looking for another product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 13% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Bonita vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

February 2025

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation

January 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.