Centreon vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE comparison

Centreon and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while NETSCOUT is ranked #62 with an average rating of 7.0. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
6,835 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Read 5 NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE reviews

2,275 Views
2,184 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centron and NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE compete in network monitoring and performance management. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has the upper hand with advanced features suited for complex network environments despite Centreon’s cost-effectiveness.

Features: Centreon offers real-time network monitoring, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration with open-source solutions. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE features extensive network diagnostics, proactive performance insights, and a focus on advanced service assurance.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could enhance its scalability for larger networks, improve advanced diagnostic capabilities, and expand service assurance features. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE may improve integration simplicity, streamline initial deployment processes, and optimize user interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon provides easy deployment focused on simplicity and flexibility, with responsive customer support. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE offers robust deployment suited for large networks, extensive troubleshooting support, and optimization assistance, requiring more setup effort.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon offers competitive setup costs and flexible pricing attractive to smaller enterprises, providing appealing ROI for cost-effective solutions. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE requires higher initial investment justified by long-term performance benefits and feature richness for enterprise-level environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,454 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

62nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Ian Munoz

Ingeniero en Telecomunicaciones at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has improved traffic visibility and simplified dashboard use, but could benefit from better integration with other tools

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE works very well in our case. We have not experienced any troubles with traffic analysis SolarWinds has a dashboard that is older and not as user-friendly. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has an easier dashboard to manipulate compared to SolarWinds. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon enables us to proactively take action on issues before they even become incidents, which significantly reduces business disruptions resulting from controllable factors."

"We have a single GUI where we can view the status of all our infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to build an abstraction of service visualization. You can add services to an entity called Business Activities and you can see the state of these activities."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of servers and networks, because we have a lot of them and need to maintain control."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

"You can concentrate and orchestrate several other solutions from other vendors. You can consolidate those solutions all in one place, then maintain and monitor from that single point. This creates ease of use. It is a very powerful solution from this point of view."

"During the day it probably saves us 50 percent of our time, and during the night it's even more."

More Centreon pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are monitoring and maintaining traffic queuing, as well as seeing who is using the bandwidth."

"nGenius provides us with increased visibility during IT deployments."

"We have seen a measurable decrease in mean time to know and mean time to repair, and because the tool allows us to get to things a lot quicker and see things a lot quicker, we have actually reduced those times and it has definitely helped with our network uptime, with an improvement in uptime of at least 50 percent."

"I like the single pane of glass view because it presents everything in one window, obviously. You can see it all. With a quick glance, you get a pretty good snapshot of what's going on in a particular situation."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE has an easier dashboard to manipulate compared to SolarWinds."

"I like the single pane of glass view. I like being able to go to one place instead of having to hunt around for everything."

"The solution's technical support team consists of good engineers and technicians."

Cons

"The scalability of Centreon is very bad because of the nature of the software."

"Currently, we have to go through all of the different templates and take a look at how the template is configured, and how specific parameters may change across different templates with different precedents, megatons, etc. It's a lot of work and involves trial and error. I wish they could simplify the process."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"I went through a few things with them to do with Centreon MAP, to do with active polygons, being able to draw an area and make that active. The functionality was in the older version of Centreon MAP and in the new version, which was a complete rewrite, they dropped it."

More Centreon cons

"NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not integrated with SolarWinds. They work in different ways."

"Before an attack starts, seeing the traffic behavior and activities would be great. The tool should also share alerts since it is an area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"They require a lot of manual effort as traffic flows, networks, and formal times change."

"In terms of additional features, I would like to see better event notification. Right now, we put in an email address to receive an alert and it receives every event and every alert that comes out. We need something a little more granular."

"Usability is the area with the biggest room for improvement. We've found that with NETSCOUT, while it's a fantastic product, the usability is a major factor because there are just way too many clicks. It's obvious, from our experience, that the people who are developing the product aren't using it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The tool's price is okay. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it as a five, where one means it is not expensive, and ten means it is the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,454 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is not integrated with SolarWinds. They work in different ways.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

On a scale of 1-10, I would rate NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE a 7.5 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 12% of the time

Allegro Network Multimeter vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 11% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 10% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Compared 3% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE product report

Also Known As

No data available

nGeniusPULSE

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE provides an efficient overview of application services and network performance with a single view, offering quick issue identification to reduce disruption.

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE is designed to offer comprehensive monitoring and maintenance of network traffic. It facilitates substantial bandwidth visibility and improves network uptime. With a user-friendly dashboard, it excels in troubleshooting to identify root causes swiftly. Although it effectively collects networking information in large enterprises, there is room for improvement in event notification granularity and reducing manual maintenance. Enhanced usability and better integration with tools like SolarWinds are desired for a more streamlined user experience.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE?

Single Pane of Glass View: Offers comprehensive visibility into network performance.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies navigation compared to alternatives.
Advanced Troubleshooting: Quickly identifies root causes of issues.
Extensive Bandwidth Visibility: Ensures network stability and uptime.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Reduced Mean Time to Know: Accelerates issue identification and resolution.
Proactive Monitoring: Detects threshold violations to maintain performance.
Cloud Environment Stability: Ensures consistency in service access.

NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE sees widespread use in sectors like finance and oil and gas, where monitoring application and service access across sites is critical. It supports the performance of unified communication applications and proactive SaaS monitoring, enhancing network stability and troubleshooting capabilities in secure environments.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Banco Votorantim

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,454 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.