Citrix Analytics for Security [EOL] vs Rapid7 InsightIDR comparison

"The solution is easy to handle."

"Very good scalability."

"I like the tool's user analysis feature."

"Rapid7 is easy to use and deploy. It is a simple solution and has easy data pulling."

"The UI is very good."

"Integration with threat modeling from the Metasploit and InsightIDR repositories."

"The alerting to drive investigations and remediation has been its most valuable feature.​"

"The solution provides satisfying native integration features"

"InsightIDR has allowed us to find potential security issues that we did not know existed, and get remediation quickly."

"It improves because several sensors are deployed within the on-premise environment. It can be very efficient if the customer implements and operates it effectively."

"The remote access features need improvement."

"Lacks recording features."

"The searching feature in Rapid7 InsightIDR needs to evolve"

"The interface for doing investigation needs to be enhanced with minor improvements that would make it more useful."

"I would like the ability to adjust the threshold of certain existing alerts. Currently the only option is to change the notifications or create my own alert."

"InsightIDR's integration with other solutions could be improved. Also, I'd like more control from the portal over what's happening on the endpoint side. For example, when I see an attack on an endpoint, I want to be able to stop it from the portal."

"The reporting is the weakest aspect. There needs to be multi-level grouping for events (for example, group by user and destination). Right now, we can do a group by user and a separate table or group by destination. But I'd be more interested in where a person was logging into instead of who was logging in or where he was logging in."

"One thing that springs to mind is easier API integration with ITSMs. We are evaluating a new ITSM and I would like to have InsightIDR create a ticket when an attack is identified, and the ticket would be closed in InsightIDR when the ITSM resolution is completed. This would take out the "single point of failure" we currently have, if the email recipient is somehow absent, in recording the risk appetite for the incident and the actions taken to mitigate or not."

"Currently, it lacks the functionalities provided by Rapid7's User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."

"The solution needs improvement in threat intelligence. Increasing the depth of intelligence to help users understand more about threats is a possibility. My suggestion is to expand access to other websites or resources."

"The solution is fairly priced. There are no additional costs involved, one only needs to pay the licensing cost."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR charges us based on the endpoints we connect to."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR is priced very well and is cost-effective."

"The pricing of the solution depends on the user. But there is a yearly licensing cost."

"It is on a yearly basis. For our own company, for about 250 users, it was 16,000 euros a year."

"It is a reasonably priced solution."

"The pricing and licensing are competitive."

"The solution has a mid-range price point in the market"

"​Accurately predict your licensing counts as this is a subscription based product.​"