We performed a comparison between Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."First of all, the manageability of the applications for publishing is valuable. Second, it is about being able to run the applications on all main platforms. Third, its licensing is valuable. You can either switch to the cloud and keep on-prem. You can work with this hybrid scenario."
"Citrix has had the top remote display for the last 20 years, and there is a huge technological gap between Citrix and its competitors."
"Before we adopted a VDI storage solution, our customers' personal information was leaked. This happened a lot. But since we adopted a VDI solution, these kinds of issues have happened rarely."
"You can connect to any printer, and from anywhere you can print documents using a compressed channel. It is easy and the bandwidth is very low."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it supports team clients."
"This is a very stable solution which you can feel confident using."
"The product is simple to set up, and its deep integration with Microsoft is also a valuable feature."
"It virtualizes the application on your desktop."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pros →
"Kesaya is highly configurable."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"Kaseya VSA's best features are auditing and reporting."
"Being able to connect to client computers without them necessarily needing to be there and being able to put in the patches and manage different information systems is valuable."
"This solution is our RMM tool and we love the deployment features."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, inventory, and patch management."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The solution was scalable."
"We would like to be able to provide VDI, a full desktop, to each of our users."
"I would like to see simplification in the management of the on-prem infrastructure component of Citrix DaaS, particularly in the studio tool used to manage the DaaS infrastructure."
"As an end-to-end solution for implementing Zero Trust principles I would rate it a six or a seven out of 10, because it doesn't cover all aspects of Zero Trust. There are quite a few aspects you need to cover."
"The product should expand its capabilities for integrating with other environments."
"Their customer support can be improved a lot as it lacks a lot of knowledgeable help."
"We have had issues with certain aspects, which is why we are looking for alternatives. For example, the firewall solution from Citrix is a bit complicated. Integration is hard."
"There are many latency and slowness issues, which are things looked after by Citrix."
"There have been many issues with stability."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Cons →
"The technical support of the solution is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"I believe we should include a VSA license to provide complete endpoint management."
"The agent-based monitoring solution can be improved."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"The predefined reports are not up to the mark and you have to do a lot of customization."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
"Some configurations and abilities from the system are not of use. The solution should offer webinars or some sort of training offerings to help users learn what the system can do and how it can be done."
"I have been looking for a way to deploy patches via the internet to selected equipment from Kaseya VSA, but it seems impossible."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is ranked 1st in Application Virtualization with 92 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 2nd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 29 reviews. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is rated 8.4, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) writes "Flexible Deployment, reliable performance, and fast transmission speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Broken from the beginning and never functioned as anticipated". Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is most compared with Amazon Appstream, VMware Horizon View, Amazon WorkSpaces, Citrix Workspace and Apache Guacamole, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.