Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Juniper Session Smart Router comparison

Citrix and Juniper are both solutions in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Juniper Session Smart Router
    Read 3 Juniper Session Smart Router reviews
    • 1,733 Views
    • 1,150 Comparison Views
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 29, 2024

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Juniper Session Smart Router compete in the WAN optimization market. Juniper Session Smart Router leads in advanced features and operational efficiency, appealing to buyers focused on cutting-edge functionalities.

    Features: Citrix SD-WAN focuses on robust prioritization, traffic shaping, and enhancing application performance. Juniper Session Smart Router is noted for session-aware routing, hyper-segmentation, and its innovative approach to network intelligence, making it versatile for dynamic environments.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix SD-WAN offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive support, suitable for companies needing traditional solutions. Juniper Session Smart Router provides a more complex but flexible deployment model, supported by responsive customer service, aligning with organizations seeking next-generation networking solutions.

    Pricing and ROI: Citrix SD-WAN has a lower initial setup cost, attractive for budget-conscious businesses, but its end-of-life status limits long-term value. Juniper Session Smart Router, though higher in setup cost, offers superior ROI due to advanced capabilities and ongoing innovation, outweighing the limitations of Citrix's future roadmap.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Report (Updated: January 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    January 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 830,824 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Juniper Session Smart Router
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    3
    Ranking in other categories
    Routers (7th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (13th)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    Sascha Bülow - PeerSpot reviewer
    Tunnel-free and secure vector routing technology is its major USP, and as a partner, we get good support from them
    The UI of the SSR conductor is the main part where improvements can be done. Today, for every configuration step, you have to do a series of clicks. What we are missing there are wizards. For example, I have two applications, and I want one application to be prioritized against the other. In such a case, a wizard for assigning policies to a service without configuring each step by hand would be very helpful. There should be an overhaul of the GUI of the conductor. The functionality they have got in the Mist portal should be baked into the conductor itself. It would be really great, but as we all know, that won't happen. Besides that, there are so many things we are discussing with the engineers and the product management of 128T or Juniper. I'm pretty sure that every feature that will come in the next half-year or three-quarters of a year would be influenced directly by us.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The most valuable feature of Citrix SD-WAN is customization. You are able to customize the solution to your needs."
    "The most valuable feature is security, as it gives me the port bindings that cannot be accomplished using other solutions."
    "The solution is brilliant, the way it calculates its paths and trails is great."
    "It allows us to use additional VPNs, offering more options compared to other VPN solutions."
    "The most valuable feature is its reliability."
    "The tool is quite cost-effective because it replaces the need for MPLS, which is a bit expensive...Citrix SD-WAN doesn't need much maintenance."
    "The stability is the main feature of Citrix SD-WAN. You can also upgrade the data packages or have less transmission."
    "The zero-touch deployment is most valuable for us."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
    "The most valuable feature of Juniper Session Smart Router is its unique SDR channel."
    "As compared to the other major vendors in the SD-WAN market, such as VeloCloud, Cisco, and others, the tunnel-free and secure vector routing technology is its major USP, which gives plenty of room to discuss with the customer why IPSec from 1998 is a bit outdated."
    "The solution is especially Session's smart, application-aware, AI-based."
     

    Cons

    "There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out."
    "I am happy with this product. If anything, its price can be reduced. It is a bit expensive."
    "I would like to see more customization to adjust for the WAN lock-out due to our unexpected power outages."
    "The communication around the life cycle would have been really helpful. The main issue we have had is related to the life cycle because some of the things that we are using were discontinued. They were discontinued within a year after we had purchased it, which is a bit painful. If we had known that, we would've made some other decisions."
    "Citrix should continue to offer a perpetual licensing model because it is very important to us."
    "Enhancements are needed to improve the stability."
    "The only improvement for Citrix SD-WAN would be to lower its cost."
    "The reports need to be improved. We need to have them customized but they don't have that right now. I would like for them to have better system predictions. We don't have that right now. My system may be working fine right now but after making some changes, that can change."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
    "Juniper Session Smart Router could be better in terms of software performance."
    "The UI of the SSR conductor is the main part where improvements can be done. Today, for every configuration step, you have to do a series of clicks. What we are missing there are wizards. For example, I have two applications, and I want one application to be prioritized against the other. In such a case, a wizard for assigning policies to a service without configuring each step by hand would be very helpful. There should be an overhaul of the GUI of the conductor. The functionality they have got in the Mist portal should be baked into the conductor itself. It would be really great, but as we all know, that won't happen."
    "Juniper Session Smart Router can improve the integration for Wi-Fi devices and add additional Sassy deployments."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    "It depends on the scale. In our case, it would have been better if we had known about the life cycling steps, but otherwise, it is worth the money."
    "It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products."
    "The license was a one-time purchase. It's expensive."
    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    "As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey."
    "It is a bit expensive. A cheaper product would be good, but everybody likes things to be cheaper. We bought the devices up front, and then we pay for the annual support."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    "It is a simple bandwidth-based license and the orchestration comes bundled with the solution by default."
    "We are currently renegotiating the offer for the licenses and the license bundle model. The license for an ISP has to be different from the license for an end customer. This is something we are currently renegotiating with Juniper, but, of course, the pricing for the licensing is always an issue when you want to get more customers."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    830,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    23%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    8%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Manufacturing Company
    6%
    Computer Software Company
    21%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Government
    6%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Juniper Session Smart Router?
    The most valuable feature of Juniper Session Smart Router is its unique SDR channel.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Session Smart Router?
    Juniper Session Smart Router is not significantly cheaper than, for example, Cisco.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Juniper Session Smart Router?
    Juniper Session Smart Router could be better in terms of software performance. Sometimes, there are glitches, especially with MTU issues that affect application communication, although this seems t...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 33% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 27% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Meraki SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Juniper Session Smart Router Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Juniper Session Smart Router
    Compared 40% of the time
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Juniper Session Smart Router Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Juniper Session Smart Router
    Compared 15% of the time
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Juniper Session Smart Router Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Juniper Session Smart Router
    Compared 10% of the time
    NFX Series Network Services Platform vs Juniper Session Smart Router Logo
    NFX Series Network Services Platform vs Juniper Session Smart Router
    Compared 9% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Juniper Session Smart Router Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Juniper Session Smart Router
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Juniper Session Smart Router Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    January 2025
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Routers
    December 2024
    Juniper Session Smart Router reportDownload Juniper Session Smart Router product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    128T Networking Platform, 128 Technology SD-WAN, Juniper SSR Series
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    Juniper
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    The 128T Networking Platform (128T) natively provides network-based security, control, and insight across data centers, wide-area networks (WAN), and edge locations for enterprises, service providers, and cloud companies alike. 128T is reshaping the way organizations design, deploy, and operate real-world networks by making them dramatically simpler, smarter, and more secure — it’s going to fix the router — and ultimately the network — as we know it.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    Revation Systems
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
    January 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: January 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    830,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.