Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Meraki SD-WAN comparison

The compared Citrix and Cisco solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #1 in SDN , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 25.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Cisco users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Meraki SD-WAN
    Read 73 Meraki SD-WAN reviews
    • 1,842 Views
    • 1,166 Comparison Views
    97% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Meraki SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: November 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    November 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Customer Service

    Sentiment score
    7.5
    Citrix SD-WAN customer support receives mixed feedback, praised for helpfulness but criticized for response times and inconsistent quality.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Room For Improvement

    Sentiment score
    5.9
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] needs easier setup, enhanced reporting, better technical support, improved security, and a refined licensing model.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Scalability Issues

    No sentiment score available
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offers scalability, flexibility, and performance optimization, supporting enterprises and smaller setups but may require significant upgrades.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Setup Cost

    No sentiment score available
    Citrix SD-WAN pricing varies widely, with options for perpetual licenses, and costs ranging from $1,000 to $20,000 per deployment.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Stability Issues

    Sentiment score
    6.6
    Users find Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] stable with minimal maintenance, despite occasional power issues and hardware failures beyond Citrix's control.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Valuable Features

    Sentiment score
    8.3
    Citrix SD-WAN offers robust security, reliability, load balancing, ease of management, cost-effectiveness, and seamless failover with centralized online management.
    No sentiment score available
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.4
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Meraki SD-WAN
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.0
    Number of Reviews
    73
    Ranking in other categories
    Software Defined Networking (SDN) (1st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    Daniel Brunnquell - PeerSpot reviewer
    Handles key elements with Dynamic bandwidth allocation
    Meraki did the job for what I needed. The key principle to follow is to let the problem drive the solution. Don’t pick a solution and try to force your problem into it. In our case, our needs drove the solution, and Meraki fit those needs best. If I were looking for more throughput, there would be better solutions. For example, Palo Alto and Fortinet can offer higher bandwidth capacities. I sized the solution based on the bandwidth available, which we likely won’t exceed. The main feature we needed was maintaining the system with minimal staff and without outsourcing support. Defining our needs led us to AutoVPN, which fits our requirement for minimal support. Meraki was the right product to meet these needs. If your priority is backend traffic and bandwidth, and you don’t need to filter traffic and scan for malware, geofence, or mesh networks, there are better options with more capacity. But that wasn’t our need. The real issue is that many people pick a solution and try to adapt their business model, which is the wrong approach. In the long run, that limits you.
    Read full review
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    22%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    8%
    Retailer
    6%
    Computer Software Company
    22%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    Financial Services Firm
    6%
    Construction Company
    5%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Meraki SD-WAN?
    The auto VPN feature is important because it automates many tasks, making things simpler and faster. It helps with setting up devices and changing configurations without manual effort.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki SD-WAN?
    The pricing of Meraki SD-WAN is a little bit on the pricey side. However, it is still a valuable product despite the cost.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Meraki SD-WAN?
    Meraki did the job for what I needed. The key principle to follow is to let the problem drive the solution. Don’t pick a solution and try to force your problem into it. In our case, our needs drove...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 8% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 25% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 17% of the time
    Omada Cloud SDN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Omada Cloud SDN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 17% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 12% of the time
    Cradlepoint NetCloud vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Cradlepoint NetCloud vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 11% of the time
    More Meraki SD-WAN Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    November 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Meraki SD-WAN
    November 2024
    Meraki SD-WAN reportDownload Meraki SD-WAN product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    No data available
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    Video not available
    Cisco
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    École Jeannine Manuel
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    November 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: November 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.