Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] vs Meraki SD-WAN comparison

The compared Citrix and Cisco solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #1 in SDN , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 25.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.
Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
Read 22 Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
    Meraki SD-WAN
    Read 71 Meraki SD-WAN reviews
    • 1,904 Views
    • 1,191 Comparison Views
    96% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] and Meraki SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: September 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    September 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 813,418 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    Meraki SD-WAN
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Number of Reviews
    71
    Ranking in other categories
    Software Defined Networking (SDN) (1st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    Rohit Ghorpade - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jul 4, 2023
    A scalable solution for MCN controller but lacks technical supports, upgrades
    There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out. Previously, we faced some issues with the slowness part. Apart from that, feature like end gateway level antivirus. We are currently using a NetFlow proxy to establish a virtual position for the NetFlow. Our current environment has many use cases, but we are not using them on the Citrix SD-WAN. When I navigate the NCL part, it involves configuration. I want to highlight this disadvantage. Sometimes, when we push the configuration, it tries to push it to all branch locations. This process takes a lot of time, nearly 30 minutes, to push a single change from the NCL. Overall, I don't think Citrix meets our use cases what we have. This is based on my feedback after using it for the past year and working on this Citrix SD-WAN. However, from my experience, it is the worst solution I have seen. There's no domain-based routing, which is horrible. That's why we are moving to other products. We have checked our use case requirements with Fortinet, Palo Alto, and they meet them. I will consider the PoC or another OEM. There are many things in the area you need to be prompt, like the automation part. If any link or device goes down, alerting notification, etc. We need to perform and highlight so many things to your management. This should be improved.
    Read full review
    Daniel Brunnquell - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jul 12, 2024
    Handles key elements with Dynamic bandwidth allocation
    Meraki did the job for what I needed. The key principle to follow is to let the problem drive the solution. Don’t pick a solution and try to force your problem into it. In our case, our needs drove the solution, and Meraki fit those needs best. If I were looking for more throughput, there would be better solutions. For example, Palo Alto and Fortinet can offer higher bandwidth capacities. I sized the solution based on the bandwidth available, which we likely won’t exceed. The main feature we needed was maintaining the system with minimal staff and without outsourcing support. Defining our needs led us to AutoVPN, which fits our requirement for minimal support. Meraki was the right product to meet these needs. If your priority is backend traffic and bandwidth, and you don’t need to filter traffic and scan for malware, geofence, or mesh networks, there are better options with more capacity. But that wasn’t our need. The real issue is that many people pick a solution and try to adapt their business model, which is the wrong approach. In the long run, that limits you.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The reliability of connectivity is most valuable."
    "The solution is brilliant, the way it calculates its paths and trails is great."
    "The most valuable feature of Citrix SD-WAN is customization. You are able to customize the solution to your needs."
    "The zero-touch deployment is most valuable for us."
    "We are using it widely for the local record for SaaS-based applications. Another valuable feature is a local breakout."
    "The best feature is the backup capability, where all of the users' computers are tied into a central data repository."
    "It allows you to combine two asymmetrical connections."
    "The VPN and the load balancing are the most valuable features."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pros
    "The most valuable feature is application awareness."
    "The solution is pretty reliable."
    "The Meraki interface is really well driven and very mature."
    "It is secure, and some features, like work device management, are very useful."
    "The most valuable feature of Meraki SD-WAN is the Auto VPN."
    "The tool is easy to use."
    "The dashboard is user-friendly. It's very simple to use."
    "The management system is one of the best available."
    More Meraki SD-WAN pros
     

    Cons

    "Citrix should continue to offer a perpetual licensing model because it is very important to us."
    "I am happy with this product. If anything, its price can be reduced. It is a bit expensive."
    "The communication around the life cycle would have been really helpful. The main issue we have had is related to the life cycle because some of the things that we are using were discontinued. They were discontinued within a year after we had purchased it, which is a bit painful. If we had known that, we would've made some other decisions."
    "Given that Citrix SD-WAN solved all our problems by providing us with everything we needed to unify communications with our branches and data centers, I cannot suggest anything further in terms of improvements."
    "The price could be improved, it's an expensive solution."
    "There are a few things that can be improved, are domain-based routing and the slowness of virtual parts, and it may be due to the wrong configuration, which we have been unable to find out."
    "I would like to see more customization to adjust for the WAN lock-out due to our unexpected power outages."
    "The price is the only thing that could be improved. Citrix is not a cheap solution."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] cons
    "Overall, we are satisfied with the support, although I cannot state this unequivocally."
    "The product could be improved by being made more simple to use. We had some issues integrating our MPLS with Meraki SD-WAN."
    "Meraki is lagging behind in using a single pipe from service providers. That is, it would be good if they could use both the internet leased line and broadband connectivity."
    "The solution is scalable for mid-tier deployments, but not for major ones."
    "The area I think this solution should improve is the pricing."
    "I would like improved stability in Meraki SD-WAN."
    "Some of the on-premise security features of Meraki SD-WAN are on the cloud and some of my customers do not want to use the cloud. They should have on-premise security features for those that do not want to use the cloud."
    "Meraki could make better use of virtual connect."
    More Meraki SD-WAN cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The price of the subscription should be cheaper."
    "I believe that Citrix SD-WAN is a good investment, but I do not have the information to be more specific."
    "I'm not quite sure of the price ranges. Roughly, the hidden devices can scale up to $20K for one appliance. However, the branch CPs are USD $1,000 to $2,500."
    "It would be helpful to have a demo license available for customers who want to prove the concept and conduct a proof of concept (POC) before committing to the solution. This is particularly important for customers in Egypt who often require a demonstration of the solution's features and compatibility with their needs before making any investment or incurring costs. Providing a demo license would allow customers to assess whether the solution would meet their needs or not."
    "Citrix SD-WAN is quite an affordable product."
    "The license was a one-time purchase. It's expensive."
    "As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey."
    "The price is relatively expensive."
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    "The product's price falls under the mid-range category, especially if we consider the new licensing model. The tool is not cheap anymore."
    "Meraki solutions come with a choice of several different subscription options including one year, three years, five years, seven years, and ten years."
    "They have a baseline software license, and then they've got an SD-WAN software license, and then they've got an advanced security software license. They're low cost, and they'll provide any amount of flexibility that you want from a modeling perspective for payment. Typically, it's either annually or multi-year, but they are a lower-cost company. They're not the most expensive by far."
    "There are no licensing costs for the product subscription."
    "The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually."
    "like everything else, it's negotiable."
    "Regarding pricing, Meraki SD-WAN is quite competitive, especially compared to solutions like Fortinet. However, it's essential to consider that Meraki requires cloud orchestration, which adds to the overall cost. Overall, it's one of the most competitive solutions from Cisco for SD-WAN."
    "Our clients pay Meraki an annual licensing fee and the pricing is not too bad when compared to other products in the Cisco portfolio."
    More Meraki SD-WAN pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    21%
    Financial Services Firm
    8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    7%
    Retailer
    7%
    Computer Software Company
    23%
    Manufacturing Company
    7%
    Retailer
    6%
    Financial Services Firm
    6%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Citrix SD-WAN?
    It lowered our Internet costs and gave me the flexibility to choose providers based on each location's connectivity.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix SD-WAN?
    It is on the expensive side. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. In my region, the approximate cost for the Citrix SD-WAN license is around $150 per user per year. However, ...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Citrix SD-WAN?
    The solution's licensing model could be improved. Citrix SD-WAN is a good product from a technical point of view. However, when you compare its licensing with the prices of competitors, you will se...
    See all answers
    What do you like most about Meraki SD-WAN?
    The auto VPN feature is important because it automates many tasks, making things simpler and faster. It helps with setting up devices and changing configurations without manual effort.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki SD-WAN?
    The pricing of Meraki SD-WAN is a little bit on the pricey side. However, it is still a valuable product despite the cost.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Meraki SD-WAN?
    Meraki did the job for what I needed. The key principle to follow is to let the problem drive the solution. Don’t pick a solution and try to force your problem into it. In our case, our needs drove...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 31% of the time
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Steelhead vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    More Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] Competitors
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 25% of the time
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 18% of the time
    Omada Cloud SDN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Omada Cloud SDN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 17% of the time
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Prisma SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 12% of the time
    Cradlepoint NetCloud vs Meraki SD-WAN Logo
    Cradlepoint NetCloud vs Meraki SD-WAN
    Compared 11% of the time
    More Meraki SD-WAN Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL]
    October 2024
    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reportDownload Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Meraki SD-WAN
    October 2024
    Meraki SD-WAN reportDownload Meraki SD-WAN product report
     

    Also Known As

    Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
    No data available
     

    Learn More

    Citrix
    Video not available
    Cisco
     

    Overview

    Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] enhances network stability, redundancy, and reliability, supporting connectivity between branches, optimizing internet access, and enabling secure, redundant networks, both on-premises and cloud-based.

    Corporations utilize Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to improve network performance, minimize downtime, and ensure high availability. Combining communication methods and supporting interbranch internet routing, it assists businesses in transitioning from MPLS, centralizing monitoring, and optimizing bandwidth use. Its functionality includes secure connections, cost reductions, and effective management of internet access. The support for multiple communication methods, application reliability, and ease of implementation make it a valuable tool for modern network management.

    What key features does Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] offer?
    • Security: Enhanced protection to safeguard network data
    • IPv6 layering over IPv4: Ensures compatibility and future-proofing
    • Active-Active bandwidth use: Maximizes bandwidth utilization
    • Zero downtime failover: Maintains continuous operation during failures
    • Zero-touch deployment: Simplifies the installation process
    • Application reliability: Ensures high performance for critical applications
    • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall networking expenses
    • Central deployment: Facilitates easy configuration updates and management
    What benefits should users look for in Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] reviews?
    • Enhanced performance: Improved application and connectivity speed
    • Increased reliability: Minimized network downtime and interruptions
    • Centralized monitoring: Streamlined network oversight and control
    • Scalable security: Adaptable protection for evolving network needs
    • Cost savings: Lower operational costs compared to traditional MPLS
    • Flexibility: Ability to handle multiple network functions effectively

    Industries implement Citrix SD-WAN [EOL] to replace costly MPLS setups with more flexible VPN and NetScaler options, benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail that require robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Organizations achieve better device management and efficient connectivity across multiple branches, enhancing their operational effectiveness.

    Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

     

    Sample Customers

    AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
    École Jeannine Manuel
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    September 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: September 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.