Claroty Platform vs Zscaler Cloud IPS comparison

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."

"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."

"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."

"Customer service is number one and the best."

"Their SRA solution, the Secure Remote Access solution, is very useful for industrial environments."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"The product's most valuable feature is complete SSL inspection."

"The initial setup is straightforward and easy in comparison with other solutions."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"Cloud IPS integration is seamless, and it uses a Zero Trust model. It also simplifies overall user access management."

"The best feature is that Zscaler allows for a separation between cloud applications and URL filtering. For example, under the cloud application segment, I can bypass Microsoft Office 365 without the need to add URLs manually. It's one click, so that's handy."

"If more AI features could be included with the Clarity solution, it would be feasible for everybody."

"Occasionally, I face a login problem despite entering the correct password."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools. Improvements could also be made in the Secure Remote Access (SRA) user interaction and graphical representations of recordings."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"The graphical user interface is quite poor."

"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."

"There is always room for improvement."

"We encounter issues sharing IP addresses with other companies using the software."

"They have given limited free access for a year. Instead, they should increase the file size and give limited free access for around two months. It will allow engineers to evaluate the product."

"We recently had a significant issue with Zscaler. I think they have too many customers and some of their connection edge nodes went down because there were too many requests. I think they aren't scaling enough to keep up with the demand in some areas. That's one thing they should improve."

"When it comes to scalability, the IPsec could be improved."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"The product is not affordable for small and medium enterprises."

"The software has become more expensive at present."

"Zscaler has so far been solely responsible for all the sales we have done with it, so it would be more suited than us to address any issues concerning the pricing."