Claroty Platform vs Zscaler Cloud IPS comparison

"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."

"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."

"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."

"Cloud IPS integration is seamless, and it uses a Zero Trust model. It also simplifies overall user access management."

"The product's most valuable feature is complete SSL inspection."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"The best feature is that Zscaler allows for a separation between cloud applications and URL filtering. For example, under the cloud application segment, I can bypass Microsoft Office 365 without the need to add URLs manually. It's one click, so that's handy."

"The initial setup is straightforward and easy in comparison with other solutions."

"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."

"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."

"The graphical user interface is quite poor."

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"They have given limited free access for a year. Instead, they should increase the file size and give limited free access for around two months. It will allow engineers to evaluate the product."

"We encounter issues sharing IP addresses with other companies using the software."

"We recently had a significant issue with Zscaler. I think they have too many customers and some of their connection edge nodes went down because there were too many requests. I think they aren't scaling enough to keep up with the demand in some areas. That's one thing they should improve."

"When it comes to scalability, the IPsec could be improved."

"There is always room for improvement."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The software has become more expensive at present."

"The product is not affordable for small and medium enterprises."

"Zscaler has so far been solely responsible for all the sales we have done with it, so it would be more suited than us to address any issues concerning the pricing."