CloudBees vs Jenkins comparison

CloudBees and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. CloudBees holds a 1.1% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 10.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

770 Views
148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,156 Views
3,557 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CloudBees

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and CloudBees compete in the continuous integration space. Based on the comparison, CloudBees seems to have an advantage in terms of scalability and enterprise-level features, while Jenkins excels in flexibility and community support.

Features: Jenkins is known for its vast library of plugins, enabling seamless integration with a wide range of third-party systems. This makes it a versatile option for varied automation needs. CloudBees offers advanced security features and supports managing multiple Jenkins instances, enhancing its appeal to large teams handling complex projects. Both tools support customizable pipelines and integration with major tools, but CloudBees stands out with its enterprise-focused capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could improve by enhancing the stability of lesser-used plugins and simplifying installation. Additionally, its interface would benefit from modernization, and increased documentation on plugin development could enhance user experience. CloudBees could address performance issues encountered during large-scale operations and improve the intuitiveness of its user interface. Reducing update dependencies on vendor priorities could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins offers deployment flexibility across various environments like on-premises and public clouds. It relies on community support, providing vast resources but sometimes lacks immediacy. CloudBees, with its enterprise-grade deployment capabilities, offers structured customer support, quicker resolution times, and tailored assistance as part of its premium service, albeit with potential cost implications.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins, being open-source, involves no licensing fees, making it a cost-effective choice that provides good ROI by enhancing productivity through automation. CloudBees, while more expensive, offers significant value due to its advanced features and enterprise-readiness. Organizations with complex continuous integration needs may find CloudBees worth its price for its comprehensive support and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. Jenkins

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,485 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 10.4%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are Java features, microservice communication, payment validation, Jenkins Sonar, management master to CloudBees, Blue Ocean, JobConfig, and support."

"CloudBees updates its features frequently, so if we need something like SSL login, they enable it."

"The security audit product offered by CloudBees is particularly beneficial in automating audit processes, which reduces the time developers spend on audits."

"CloudBees is a user-friendly tool."

"CloudBees's user interface is very simple and user-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its flexibility."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"The initial setup is easy."

More CloudBees pros

"Jenkins integrates with multiple tools like Bitbucket and makes life easier. We don't have to write a lot of code since a lot of libraries are available."

"Automation of chores like deployment, frequent manual tasks (like running scripts on test and production systems) reduced the time used and the number of errors made by engineers, freeing them to do meaningful work instead."

"This is a great integration tool and very powerful."

"Continuous Integration. Jenkins can integrate with almost any systems used for application development and testing, with its plugins."

"I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company."

"Jenkins is very user-friendly."

"Has a good interface, is reliable and saves time."

"Also, the ability to customize these plugins is valuable. Its user-friendliness stands out, especially in its user interface which allows easy installation and configuration."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"To improve efficiency, they should focus on smoother label deployment."

"If you're logged in and working for about thirty minutes and then go idle for five to ten minutes, Jenkins will prompt you to re-authenticate."

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"I would like to see improved speed and availability."

"We did face some challenges, particularly with the infrastructure."

"A lot of stability issues are there with CloudBees."

More CloudBees cons

"Improvement-wise, I would want the solution's user interface to be changed for the better. In short, the solution can be made more user-friendly."

"The product should provide more visualization as to how many pipelines are performing and how many builds are happening. It should also integrate with Kubernetes and OpenShift."

"There is no way for the cloud repositories to trigger Jenkins."

"Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly."

"Sometimes you have Jenkins restarting because of OOM errors."

"They need to improve their documentation."

"And I don't care too much for the Jenkins user interface. It's not that user-friendly compared to other solutions available right now. It's not a great user experience. You can do just fine if you are a techie, but it would take a novice some time to learn it and get things done."

"This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is no cost. It is open source."

"Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source."

"The solution is open source."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

"It is free."

"Some of the add-ons are too expensive."

"Jenkins is open source."

"Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Legal Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 56% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 27% of the time

Tekton vs CloudBees

Compared 16% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

March 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

March 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Overview

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

CloudBees

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. Jenkins

March 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. Jenkins

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. Jenkins report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.