Collibra Lineage vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Collibra and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Collibra is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ping Identity is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2. Collibra holds a 3.4% mindshare in DG, compared to Ping Identity’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Collibra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Collibra Lineage

Read 7 Collibra Lineage reviews

1,634 Views
1,272 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 28 Ping Identity Platform reviews

65 Views
66 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Collibra Lineage

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Collibra Lineage both serve niche areas, with Ping standing out in support and pricing, whereas Collibra offers superior features for advanced users.

Features: Ping Identity Platform features robust authentication, access control, and single sign-on, providing effective identity management. Collibra Lineage is known for data lineage tracking, metadata management, and comprehensive data governance, offering deep insights into data flow and management.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance its analytics capabilities, integrate advanced data governance features, and improve cloud-specific functionalities. Collibra Lineage may benefit from simplifying its setup process, expanding identity management capabilities, and enhancing integration with diverse applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform provides flexible deployment and responsive support, ideal for customizable setups. Collibra Lineage excels with its cloud-based convenience but may involve a more complex initial setup, emphasizing its out-of-the-box solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform is cost-effective with lower initial costs, offering swift integration and ROI. Collibra Lineage commands higher upfront costs but promises significant ROI for those focusing on detailed data governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Lineage

Ranking in Data Governance

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Collibra Lineage is 3.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Prabhjyot Singh

Data and Analytics Manager at BMO Financial

Faster and more efficient than manual methods or other tools like Informatica

The main differences between Collibra Lineage and Informatica are significant, particularly for small to mid-sized organizations. First, Informatica requires a dedicated team, which incurs a huge cost, making it less suitable for smaller organizations. Second, Informatica's tools are very scattered. For instance, to create a domain, you need to use Axon, and then for lineage, you must use EDC. For profiling, Informatica Developer or Analyst is required. These different tools are not well-connected to display everything on one screen. While Informatica is trying to improve with its cloud version, not many users have adopted it yet. These are the two main areas where Informatica lags.

Read full review

Dilip Reddy

Ping Engineer at Equitable

Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability

In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows how the data was transformed on the way and how the solutions were derived. This is the essence of the tool and why it is so powerful."

"The solution has very good online assistance."

"The diagrams are good for data visualization."

"The most valuable features of Collibra Lineage are the multiple options for automation. Additionally, if you have a scenario where automation does not work, you have the option to manually create the lineage. The solution does not force you to always go through an automated way where you have broken lineage and you are stuck without a lineage."

"The solution allowed us to quickly and efficiently implement our data governance operating model, including accountabilities, regulatory lineage, and data dictionaries. This was much faster and more efficient than manual methods or other tools like Informatica. I prefer Collibra Lineage for its self-service capabilities."

"The solution makes data more discoverable and transparent."

"We find the most valuable feature of this solution to be the lineage aspect."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"It is a scalable solution."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."

"We use the product to run different reports."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"Collibra Lineage could improve connectively. If they can offer more out-of-the-box connectors, which come as in a package compared to you having to go and buy a lot in the marketplace for certain specific connectors."

"Collibra doesn't provide support for integration for SAP Info Steward directly with Collibra."

"The product must be cheaper."

"The workflow documentation must be improved."

"We would like this solution to be able to connect directly to the databases, so we can pull directly from Databank without manual intervention."

"It would be better if features like the privacy module and AI-based Collibra DQ were included in one package instead of being separate and requiring additional costs. Currently, the basic package covers lineage and documentation, but the extra modules come at an extra cost."

"Before you can use this solution, you have to make a lot of changes to how you measure your information in your organization, the data governance and policies, and the organizational structures that use them. Many companies believe that if they purchase the licenses for the tool that they have done the job, but this is far from the case with this tool."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."

"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different licenses available for Collibra Lineage based on what kind of access you want. If you want, for example, a read-only license they have different ones to pick from."

"It's expensive, especially for small companies."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The product is costly."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Collibra Lineage?

The solution makes data more discoverable and transparent.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Collibra Lineage?

The licensing cost depends on our requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Collibra Lineage?

It would be better if features like the privacy module and AI-based Collibra DQ were included in one package instead of being separate and requiring additional costs. Currently, the basic package c...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 80% of the time

MANTA Flow vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 10% of the time

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 5% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 3% of the time

OneTrust DataGovernance vs Collibra Lineage

Compared 3% of the time

More Collibra Lineage Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 10% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage

April 2025

Download Collibra Lineage product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Data lineage reveals how data transforms through its life cycle across interactions with systems, applications, APIs and reports. Collibra Lineage automatically maps relationships between data to show how data sets are built, aggregated, sourced and used.

Collibra

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Collibra Lineage vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.