

Control-M and GoAnywhere MFT are prominent contenders in the workflow automation and file transfer software category. Control-M appears to have the upper hand in larger enterprise environments due to its expansive features, while GoAnywhere MFT is particularly beneficial for secure file transfers with its robust security and automation features.
Features: Control-M offers cross-platform compatibility and a powerful batch scheduling system, integrating seamlessly with diverse systems such as AS400. Its high availability and extensive automation capabilities make it ideal for complex workflows. GoAnywhere MFT excels in secure file transfer with its comprehensive workflow automation, intuitive interface, and encryption features. It effectively centralizes data exchanges, simplifying file management without the need for custom scripts.
Room for Improvement: Control-M can enhance its offering by improving its output analysis tools with arithmetic operations and better reporting functionalities. Its Automation API documentation is noted as needing more clarity, with a call for a more user-friendly web client. GoAnywhere MFT users desire improved enterprise support and detailed logging for troubleshooting, as well as easier cloud integration and more training resources for users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports various deployments, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, with reliable technical support and a robust user community, ensuring swift assistance from vendors. GoAnywhere MFT offers flexible deployment options and is praised for its straightforward setup and decent customer service, although support interactions could benefit from being more prompt.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is perceived as expensive due to its pricing based on tasks or endpoints, which might be challenging for smaller organizations; however, its extensive feature set often justifies the cost for larger enterprises, enhancing operational efficiency and resource savings. GoAnywhere MFT's competitive one-time license model is seen as reasonable, providing excellent value, especially for organizations utilizing its full capabilities. Both solutions deliver strong ROI by boosting efficiency and reducing manual interventions.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
GoAnywhere can perform the work of three people, leading to a decrease in manpower needs for automation and file transfer.
There is a drastic improvement in time; at least a 50% to 60% improvement in terms of effort.
In terms of percentage, for the amount of volume we are doing with GoAnywhere MFT and its functionality, I would estimate it has provided about a 50% return in four years.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
It's not a situation where you raise a ticket and wait for 48 hours to get a response; it's immediate.
They not only help you resolve issues but also ensure that you feel comfortable managing them in the future.
We can also email them, so through live chat I asked my questions and they cleared them, providing good technical support.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
The scalability is ten out of ten because it works effectively even with many users, large files, and a lot of data moving at once.
I would rate the scalability of GoAnywhere MFT as a ten.
Stability is excellent, downtime is rare, and even large files can be transferred completely without any problem.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
The stability of the application itself is excellent.
Stability is excellent, downtime is rare, and even large files can be transferred completely without any problem.
It works very well, especially when kept up to date.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
That's the only thing that could help if the application could log what caused the error for us to prevent it.
We had to reach out to GoAnywhere support, and they were quick to provide support within a day, so we were able to complete that use case.
when the application runs on a server and encounters problems, it doesn't provide detailed information on the server issues, which could help users troubleshoot better.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Azure is significantly more expensive.
There are approximately 30% to 40% savings.
It is cost-efficient.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
It provides multiple cipher options for HTTPS and SFTP protocols, utilizing AES-based algorithms for secure communication and data transfer.
I can produce reports for security and have full control over secure protocols allowed on the system, making it easy to comply with security standards such as Sarbanes-Oxley.
Before, we had to write scripts and manually update them to move data around, encrypt files, or rename files. Now we just use the GUI to set the modules for transfers, encryption, renaming, and copying, allowing us to set it and schedule it to run without any user interaction.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GoAnywhere MFT | 10.3% |
| Control-M | 4.2% |
| Other | 85.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 122 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 39 |
Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
GoAnywhere MFT offers user-friendly workflow features, advanced security, and seamless integrations. Its intuitive interface supports streamlined operations and rapid project creation, making it suitable for managing secure file transfers.
GoAnywhere MFT provides sophisticated automation through Advanced Workflows, enabling reduced manual tasks and improved efficiency. With centralized data exchange, file monitoring, and comprehensive security protocols, it supports scalability, encryption, and IP filtering for enhanced protection. Users appreciate its adaptability with systems including IBM and Epic, contributing to improved process management and significant time savings. While beneficial, enhancements in DNS support, user interface intuitiveness, and customer service responsiveness are potential growth areas. License costs are noted as high, with demands for better documentation, cloud service integrations, and improved scalability and load-balancing functionalities.
What are the key features of GoAnywhere MFT?GoAnywhere MFT is deployed by organizations for secure file transfers across systems like financial, healthcare, and corporate sectors. It supports SFTP, FTP, and HTTPS for data exchanges and is highly effective in automating processes and managing large file movements efficiently. It integrates well with cloud platforms like Azure and accommodates environments such as Windows, Linux, and IBM iSeries.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.