Coralogix vs Elastic Observability comparison

Coralogix and Elastic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Elastic’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,527 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 26 Elastic Observability reviews

9,946 Views
8,673 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and Elastic Observability are leading solutions in data observability. Coralogix has the upper hand in terms of user satisfaction with its pricing and support, while Elastic Observability is preferred for its comprehensive features and perceived high value.

Features: Coralogix offers automated data clustering, alerting capabilities, and streamlined monitoring. Elastic Observability provides robust searching, multiple data source integration, and extensive features for users with diverse needs.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix could improve its visualization tools, onboarding process, and user interface. Elastic Observability needs better documentation, more seamless integrations, and enhanced user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix has a straightforward deployment model with minimal setup time and responsive customer service. Elastic Observability, although more complex to deploy, offers extensive customization options and supportive service.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is noted for competitive setup costs and a favorable return on investment. Elastic Observability, though more expensive initially, has a scalable pricing model and long-term ROI that justifies its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Ranking in Log Management

39th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), API Management (29th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

7th

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 5.4%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

More Coralogix pros

"It is scalable and supports multitenancy, which is beneficial for MSPs."

"It is a powerful tool that allows users to collect and transform logs as needed, enabling flexible visualization and analysis."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."

"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."

"Good design and easy to use once implemented."

"The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization."

"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

More Coralogix cons

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

"Elastic Observability’s price could be improved."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"The product is not that cheap."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Of course, maintenance is necessary, as with any software, requiring updates with the latest features and security enhancements. It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like netw...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 29% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

March 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

March 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability

February 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.