Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cornerstone Learning vs Moodle comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Organizations experience complex ROI from Cornerstone Learning, with mixed immediate returns but benefits in training management and compliance.
Sentiment score
8.1
Moodle boosts productivity by 60%, offering cost-effective solutions with positive ROI, saving time and money in training management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Cornerstone Learning support is reliable, responsive, with knowledgeable staff, but could improve in first-level support and ticket resolution speed.
Sentiment score
6.1
Moodle offers self-service support via forums, with community help available, but direct support requires engaging a Moodle partner.
Customer service and support are very user-friendly and supportive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Cornerstone Learning offers flexible scalability, minimal disruptions, and consistent performance for diverse organizational needs and large-scale operations.
Sentiment score
7.6
Moodle scales efficiently for diverse user needs, supporting institutions from schools to enterprises, facilitating seamless large-scale deployments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Cornerstone Learning is highly stable, reliable, and secure, with rare brief instabilities quickly resolved by the support team.
Sentiment score
7.9
Moodle is highly stable and reliable, supporting many users when correctly set up and regularly updated.
It does not have significant issues and is reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Cornerstone Learning requires enhancements in UI/UX, reporting, app integration, support, navigation, content customization, and third-party platform integration.
Moodle needs user-friendly improvements, better documentation, enhanced accessibility, seamless integration, and customization to support diverse and non-technical users.
Cornerstone needs to be more adaptable by generating content by just giving keywords.
 

Setup Cost

Cornerstone Learning enterprise pricing ranges from $10 to $11 per user with additional costs for modules, services, and integrations.
Moodle provides a flexible, cost-effective LMS with varied pricing for features, support, and deployment options for organizations.
Cornerstone is reasonable in terms of pricing and not very expensive compared to other LMS.
 

Valuable Features

Cornerstone Learning offers customizable analytics, automation, and integration, emphasizing user-friendliness, mobility, scalability, and strong support for dynamic training.
Moodle offers open-source flexibility, extensive plugins, community support, and features enhancing usability, customization, integration, and engagement monitoring.
It allows internal content management, playlist creation, using external links for learning, and supports various AI training.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cornerstone Learning
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Talent Management (8th), Virtual Training (3rd)
Moodle
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Learning Management Systems (LMS) category, the mindshare of Cornerstone Learning is 4.8%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Moodle is 14.8%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
 

Featured Reviews

Vladimir Vasilev - PeerSpot reviewer
Great reporting, curriculum, and learning assignment management
We primarily use the solution as a way to allow people to take online courses.  When you need to serve big organizations and you need to train thousands of employees, it's hard to organize on-site courses. With online training, you can train people online quickly and at the same time.  The…
James Phelps - PeerSpot reviewer
Inexpensive and pretty easy to use, but not easily adaptable for an individual
It does have some problems that are hard to work around, but they can be worked around once you figure out how to make it function or how to work with specific components. The ability to input modified, individual, independent grades in a grade center component is not just hard. It almost always requires you to get tech involved. When you're dealing with a learning system where you have people in an open enrollment with all different levels of learning modes or methodologies, and as well as a worldwide student body, you end up with situations where you have to absolutely exempt somebody from a grade or an assignment and enter a new, different kind of assignment because of their skillset or lack thereof. You can't do that in Moodle. It is virtually impossible to do that in Moodle without having a tech do it for you, and when you have to have that level of tech support, it becomes problematic. They need to fix the grade book center. It is the part where you do evaluations. They need to fix it so that the individual professors can make changes directly without having to get a hold of tech support to do it for them.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
61%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
14%
Comms Service Provider
14%
University
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Cornerstone Learning reliable for content organization?
I think the organizational management of Cornerstone Learning is great. My organization uses this learning software and the way different content types are managed is very useful for our training ...
Does Cornerstone Learning provide you with good reports?
Cornerstone Learning provides great reports for your training programs and the performance of your employees on them. What's more, you get skills graphs which my company finds the most valuable for...
Why would you recommend Cornerstone as a platform for virtual training?
Hello, I think that Cornerstone is more than suitable for virtual training. For one, it gives you a really big array of tools and customizations to be able to deliver your employees high-quality t...
What do you like most about Moodle?
The customization features of Moodle significantly enhance the learning experience for our users.
What needs improvement with Moodle?
The customization of the interface could be improved. Although we can load and change themes, it still always looks like Moodle. We have not found a way to significantly alter its appearance.
What is your primary use case for Moodle?
We use Moodle to manage our students' information, the classes, and the course catalog, which are mainly related to education. It serves as a learning management system for teaching in class.
 

Also Known As

Cornerstone Learning Suite, Saba Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advantage Sales and Marketing
Acacia University, Alliant International University, American University of Health Sciences, Anaheim University Online, Aspen University, Cal State University San Bernardino, California State University Los Angeles, Chattanooga Fire Training, City of Humble Fire Department, George Washington University, Georgia Institute of Emergency Medical Services, Michigan Online Classroom, Virginia Beach Sheriffs Office, Washington Post
Find out what your peers are saying about Cornerstone Learning vs. Moodle and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.