Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security and reduces costs, despite challenges in quantifying precise ROI, with immediate benefits.
Sentiment score
7.0
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers 30% ROI, saving $1000-$1500 yearly, with proven robust security over seven years.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has reduced costs and manpower.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager support varies; effectiveness depends on user experience, with inconsistent response times and complex contact methods.
Sentiment score
5.2
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud's support garners mixed reviews, citing helpful service but slow response times and inconsistent quality.
They respond immediately to our inquiries, resolve issues promptly, and provide valuable guidance, especially in critical situations.
Earlier, we received support for normal tickets within a day, but now it takes one or two days to resolve issues.
We engage them when needed and receive prompt responses that typically resolve our issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager scales efficiently for small to massive deployments, supporting cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
Sentiment score
7.5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is praised for scalability, easily accommodating organizations of all sizes with flexible scaling options.
We can set permissions per team or department, allowing some teams to elevate specific applications while others have different permissions.
Scalability is excellent because it is SaaS-based.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is quite scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable with high performance but occasionally experiences downtime during upgrades, especially on non-Windows systems.
Sentiment score
7.5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is generally stable and well-rated, though occasional database update issues impact its ratings.
It is a robust solution that has effectively supported our environment without major issues.
Windows 10 and 11 are stable operating systems, and we are not facing issues, unlike with Windows 7 when bugs were prevalent.
Since implementing it, we have not experienced any outages or stability issues.
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager needs user-friendly enhancements, better integration, faster support, pricing adjustments, and improved threat detection tools.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud needs better stability, resource efficiency, threat communication, and feature enhancements for diverse business needs.
Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site.
Some connections to third-party analyzing engines, like Palo Alto and others, which can check hashes and similar functionalities, were working in the self-hosted version of EPM yet are not supported in the software as a service version.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications.
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly, especially for small businesses, with potential discounts for large enterprises.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud's annual fee is flexible and often seen as reasonable, though some find it expensive.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions.
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager ensures security and compliance through admin control, ransomware protection, and advanced credential analytics.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud provides robust anti-phishing and anti-malware protection with detailed reports and efficient management through a cloud-based console.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager effectively reduces malicious content in applications by allowing us to identify and block dangerous applications.
I can see an incident on the board, and it is clear to analyze what is happening on the endpoint devices.
The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights.
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (4th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (3rd), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th)
Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
9th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Ransomware Protection category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 7.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Ransomware Protection
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
AnikIslam - PeerSpot reviewer
Automatic update feature could be better and multi-layered protection capability needs enhancement
The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective. It also provides web threat protection by blocking unwanted websites. It provides multi-layered protection. Although it could be more efficient, it is sufficient for regular purposes. I would not recommend it based on my experience. I rate it a three out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ransomware Protection solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
The product is a bit expensive and requires extensive price negotiation with local vendors. Comparable to market pricing, good products generally have similar pricing levels.
What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?
While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed. The quality of suppor...
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.