CyberArk Identity vs Fortinet FortiToken comparison

CyberArk and Fortinet are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Fortinet is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. CyberArk holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Fortinet’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 23 CyberArk Identity reviews

636 Views
525 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiToken

Read 29 Fortinet FortiToken reviews

3,905 Views
2,808 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Fortinet FortiToken

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Fortinet FortiToken and CyberArk Identity are prominent security solutions competing in the identity management category. CyberArk Identity is considered superior due to its features, which users feel justify the higher cost.

What features are offered by Fortinet FortiToken in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Fortinet FortiToken users value its robust two-factor authentication, seamless integration with Fortinet products, and competitive pricing. CyberArk Identity is praised for its comprehensive identity management capabilities, including single sign-on, adaptive multi-factor authentication, and extensive security features. These functionalities give CyberArk Identity an edge.

What areas of improvement can be found in Fortinet FortiToken in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Users of Fortinet FortiToken suggest enhancing its reporting features, user management capabilities, and initial configuration process. CyberArk Identity users call for simpler configuration processes, enhanced mobile app performance, and improved user interface. FortiToken's areas for improvement are more technical, whereas CyberArk Identity's are more usability-focused.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Fortinet FortiToken in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Fortinet FortiToken's deployment is straightforward, although some find the initial configuration complex. CyberArk Identity receives mixed feedback on deployment; some find it straightforward, while others struggle with setup. Fortinet FortiToken users report quicker and more helpful support compared to CyberArk Identity, which offers more comprehensive onboarding.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Fortinet FortiToken in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Fortinet FortiToken is generally seen as cost-effective, with lower setup costs and solid return on investment. CyberArk Identity's initial costs are higher, but the extensive features and security enhancements provide a worthwhile ROI, making it a better long-term investment due to its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (11th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (9th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Fortinet FortiToken

Ranking in Authentication Systems

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiToken is 6.5%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Facilitates secure 2FA for admins, facilitates OTP generation, and enhances security

One suggestion is to develop a more user-friendly solution that is cost-effective so that a hardware-based solution can be provided to all users using VPN services or any configuration service requiring confidentiality. This would allow for broader distribution among a larger number of system admins and software engineers, which is currently not feasible with the existing hardware-only approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

"The features that I personally find most effective in terms of security stem from the fact that it is easy to integrate and also the adoption is faster."

"I had one machine that I could not use due to an invalid token. They resolved the problem immediately after I reported it, on the same day, within one hour. It is a very good experience."

"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."

"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."

"The best thing I like about CyberArk Identity is that it does not require heavy implementation, complex hardware, or complex training."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"The integrated Fortinet security with the app that allows you to easily do the two-factor authentication is most valuable."

"The solution is unique in catering to Fortinet, making it very useful and secure."

"Overall, I give the product a nine out of ten."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features."

"Fortinet FortiToken is used for double factor authentication."

"One of the product's most valuable features is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its mobile application. It is particularly beneficial as it eliminates the need for hardware management."

"The token-based authentication is good and modern aspect."

More Fortinet FortiToken pros

Cons

"Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity."

"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team."

"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team. Sometimes, there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email, which could be addressed for better service."

"Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity."

"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."

"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"They need to develop a more user-friendly solution that is cost-effective so that a hardware-based solution can be provided to all users using VPN services or any configuration service requiring confidentiality."

"We can only use the tool with the FortiToken Mobile app."

"The tool could be a little cheaper."

"Configuration can be confusing due to the lack of community and context-sensitive help. We've had to rely on technical support, which slows down the setup process."

"They could enhance synchronization with mobile applications, and addressing minor issues with authentication could further improve user experience."

"I would like to see the product improvements in dynamic VLAN pooling. Specifically, when users are assigned different VLANs based on their SSID, ensuring no unintended lateral traffic between users would enhance security and efficiency."

"Fortinet FortiToken should improve its push notifications."

"It could be integrated better if you could have your FortiToken, and the license would allow you to work across multiple FortiGate solutions."

More Fortinet FortiToken cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the cheapest, and ten is the highest, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing is not very high, so I'd rate it around six out of ten, where one is high and ten is low."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019."

"The platform's licensing cost is reasonable for our organization."

"Overall, it's cheaper than other solutions. Of course, we evaluated it five years back, and I haven't checked to see its current market position, but one reason we adopted FortiToken is its lower cost of ownership relative to other solutions we evaluated."

"Fortinet FortiToken is not an expensive solution."

More Fortinet FortiToken pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

It does not have global market penetration, and sometimes, there are support issues. CyberArk Identity can definitely improve on the IAM rules when I create them. The stability can also be better.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiToken?

The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authenticat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiToken?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiToken?

I am using FortiToken for logging into the Fortinet hardware. I have four FortiGate hardware units. I am connected through a simulator on FortiToken.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 12% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 18% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 16% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiToken Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

April 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Download Fortinet FortiToken product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

As we've seen, passwords alone don't keep unwanted guests out of your network. Password-only authentication has led to security breaches, malware infections, and policy violations. With two-factor authentication, a password is used along with a security token and authentication server to provide far better security. Authorized employees can remotely access company resources safely using a variety of devices, ranging from lpatops to mobile phones.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiToken report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.