Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Logpoint comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 23 Logpoint reviews

871 Views
416 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason and Logpoint offer robust solutions in the endpoint detection and response category. Cybereason holds the upper hand in terms of support and pricing flexibility, though Logpoint’s advanced functionalities justify its higher cost.

Features: Cybereason is praised for its intuitive alerting system, threat detection capabilities, and pricing flexibility. Logpoint users highlight its advanced analytics, customizability, and comprehensive feature set. Despite both products having strong feature sets, Logpoint's advanced analytics give it a slight edge.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users suggest improvements in integration capabilities, reporting features, and overall system performance. Logpoint users indicate the need for enhancements in system performance, documentation, and deployment process. Both products have unique areas needing focus, but Cybereason requires better integration enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason users find the deployment process straightforward and commend the excellent customer service. Logpoint users mention that while deployment can be complex, the customer service is efficient. Both products provide good customer service, but Cybereason has a simpler deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Cybereason reasonably priced, appreciating its quick ROI. Logpoint’s higher cost is offset by its comprehensive features, leading to a longer but substantial ROI. Cybereason is favored for its cost-effectiveness, while Logpoint is seen as a valuable long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint Report (Updated: April 2025).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)

Logpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (23rd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (8th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Abdullah Secca

Cyber Security Analyst at Pacific Propeller

Valuable monitoring and integration features boost compliance

They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined. They migrated operations from Boston to Denmark, and we cannot use a tool hosted outside the country. Additionally, dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"The solution is efficient."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The most beneficial was being able to prove, with proper reports, that from a compliance perspective, the company is in control. The service part of LogPoint did modifications or did some additional work to have the proper reports defined."

"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."

"In my experience with medium-sized operations, LogPoint's scalability is excellent, so I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."

"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."

"What I like best about LogPoint is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. LogPoint also has better dashboards which I find valuable. I also like that you can create use cases based on your assets."

"It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. LogPoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parseable because all logs are not the same, but with LogPoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them."

"The solution is user-friendly."

More Logpoint pros

Cons

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."

"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."

"The interface needs things like wizards that will assist with creating complex correlation rules."

"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."

"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."

"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature. It would be nice if it was in with the standard products."

"Dashboards could be developed further."

"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable. If a log has a very specific structure, it is very easy to parse and create a parser for it, but if a log has a free form, meaning that it is of any length or it can change at any time, handling such a log is very challenging, not just in LogPoint but also in everything else. Everybody struggles with that scenario, and LogPoint is also in the same boat. One-third of logs are of free form or not of a specific length, and you can run into situations where it is almost impossible to parse the log, even if they try to help you. It is just the nature of the beast."

More Logpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"It's less expensive than the competitors. The Logpoint marketing team is very accommodating and client-friendly. They offer very good reductions in price. They are pretty good in this aspect. They are transparent in their licensing and pricing."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

61%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about LogPoint?

The solution is user-friendly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not. Additionally, there should be compliance mapping, where the features and actions within Logpoint map to security compliance standards.

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 19% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 15% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Logpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Logpoint

Compared 9% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Logpoint product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Logpoint is a cutting-edge security information and event management (SIEM) solution that is designed to be intuitive and flexible enough to be used by an array of different businesses. It is capable of expanding according to its users' needs.

Benefits of Logpoint

Some of the benefits of using Logpoint include:

Unifies data logs: Logpoint creates a single system of classification for collected data. It makes it easy for users to search for and find data, which aids users when they are creating reports or alerts. Users can conserve resources while at the same time seeing a rise in the efficiency of their business operations.

Intuitive solution design: Logpoint is designed so that anyone can utilize all of its features, even if they are not an expert in network security. Logpoint’s UI is simple enough that users can utilize it without undergoing extensive training.

Highly flexible: Logpoint is designed so that users can scale it linearly to accommodate projects that are large and complex. This allows users to expand the scope of their projects according to their needs without worrying that their infrastructure won’t be able to handle the increase in size. The solution’s security features can be deployed both on the cloud and in a physical environment.

Simple role-based access security: Logpoint allows administrators to employ Microsoft’s active directory (AD) and a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol to manage user access. These can help administrators protect their systems from being abused or otherwise harmed by bad actors.

Reviews from Real Users

Logpoint is a security and management solution that stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its data gathering and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Logpoint enables users to not only gather the data, but also to maximize both the amount of data that can be gathered and its usefulness. It removes many of the challenges that users may face in data collection. The solution allows users to set rules for collection and then it pulls information from sources that meet the rules that have been set. This data is then broken into manageable segments and ordered. Users can then analyze these ordered segments with ease. Additionally, LogPoint utilizes both machine learning and AI technology. Users gain the ability to protect themselves from and if necessary resolve emerging threats as soon as they arise. The AI sets security parameters for a user’s system. These act as a baseline that are triggered and notify the user if anything deviates from the rules that it set up.

The chief infrastructure & security officer at a financial services firm writes, “It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. Logpoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parsed because all logs are not the same, but with Logpoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them.”

A. Secca., a Cyber Security Analyst at a transportation company, writes, “It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all of the user’s activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline.”

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Logpoint