Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

41st

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

29th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"It is easy to manage."

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"The most valuable feature of Panda Security Adaptive Defense is we don't have to have dedicated infrastructure on-premise because it is cloud-based."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"They need to improve their technical support services."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"The stability could be improved. My teammates who use Panda Security and I have experienced some issues."

"We do get the odd false positive when we're trying to install the software."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

"The implementation was difficult."

"I would like to see better data protection."

"They could have more reports."

"It would be nice if Panda Security Adaptive Defense could come out with remote desktop usage."

"Their MacOS support isn't that good."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing is manageable."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Hospitality Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

I would rate the pricing as six out of ten, and its costs appear to be moderately priced.

What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement. We also face false positives, which are a...

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 8% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 7% of the time

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Panda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops

Learn More

Video not available

Cybereason

WatchGuard

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360