Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

Cybereason and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Cybereason is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.2, while WatchGuard is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.9. Cybereason holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews
  • 3,928 Views
  • 2,188 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Read 28 Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reviews
  • 3,241 Views
  • 2,715 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response are two leading endpoint security solutions. Users find Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response superior for its comprehensive features, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is praised for its pricing and support.

Features: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers automated threat detection, detailed forensic information, and simplicity in use. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response provides advanced threat hunting, multi-layer protection, and a more robust feature set.

Room for Improvement: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 could improve integration capabilities, reporting tools, and some user interface aspects. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response can enhance real-time response speed, reduce resource consumption, and refine user training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is simple to deploy and has fast, helpful customer support. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response deployment requires more technical expertise, and users occasionally report delays in support.

Pricing and ROI: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is cost-effective with good ROI, particularly for small to mid-sized businesses. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is pricier but justified by its advanced features and better security outcomes, making it worth the investment for larger organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
35th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
30th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
23rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer - PeerSpot reviewer
We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious
The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.
Read full review
PaolaLamura - PeerSpot reviewer
While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI
I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."
"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."
"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."
"Their EDR solution, the ability to mitigate issues through their command line, is probably the best feature that we've had. We use that all the time. It's very useful for doing investigations."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The solution is efficient."
"The interface is user-friendly."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."
"The EDR has a high accuracy rate with only a few false positives."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"It is stable, and the performance is good."
"The interface is great."
"I like the Panda Security Adaptive Defense cloud usages. Everything is on a single plane of glass like the dashboards. I also like the information I can get about the computers itself."
"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."
More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros
 

Cons

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."
"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."
"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."
"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."
"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."
"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."
"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."
"The product's reporting isn't great."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons
"The stability could be improved. My teammates who use Panda Security and I have experienced some issues."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"Panda Security Adaptive Defense is stable. However, when updates are being done on the computers we can experience some troubles because the computers need to be restarted. When we start the computers they are not functioning correctly and we have not received proper feedback regarding this random issue."
"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."
"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."
"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."
"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor."
"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."
More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."
"The pricing is manageable."
"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."
"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice
"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."
"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."
"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."
"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."
"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."
"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."
"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."
"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."
More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Hospitality Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...
See all answers
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The interface is user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
Although it is not a cheap solution, it is satisfying and functional. It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?
The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 27% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 10% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 9% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 5% of the time
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Compared 25% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Compared 9% of the time
WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Logo
WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Compared 8% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Compared 7% of the time
More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
March 2025
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reportDownload Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report
Buyer's Guide
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
March 2025
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reportDownload Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops
 

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

WatchGuard
 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360
February 2025
Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.