Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response comparison

Cybereason and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2, while WatchGuard is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. Cybereason holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews
  • 2,926 Views
  • 1,626 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
WatchGuard Threat Detection...
Read 13 WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response reviews
  • 995 Views
  • 746 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response are two competitive endpoint security solutions. Cybereason has an advantage in ease of deployment and customer service, while WatchGuard stands out for feature richness and ROI.

Features: Cybereason is praised for its robust threat detection capabilities, intuitive management console, and user-friendly interface. WatchGuard offers comprehensive threat intelligence, automation features, and a strong integration ecosystem. Users find WatchGuard more versatile for advanced use cases due to its extensive feature sets and integration possibilities.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason could improve its reporting functions, reduce false positives, and enhance scalability. WatchGuard users call for better documentation, enhanced scalability, and a more polished deployment process. Cybereason is noted for its consistency in updates, while WatchGuard could use ongoing support enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason's straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support make it easy for organizations to integrate and use. WatchGuard requires more intricate initial setup and has mixed reviews on customer service efficiency. This makes Cybereason more suitable for organizations seeking quick deployment and strong support.

Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard is viewed as a cost-effective solution with high return on investment due to its robust features. Cybereason, though more expensive, is praised for its efficiency and lower long-term operational costs. While WatchGuard offers a better upfront value, Cybereason's operational benefits justify its higher price for some organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th)
WatchGuard Threat Detection...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer - PeerSpot reviewer
We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious
The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.
Read full review
Jose Fos - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution provides automated responses and helps protect our systems
We use the solution to protect our systems. We also use it for real-time detection The tool provides automated responses. It has a lot of features. The interface is not the best. I do not like it. The reports must also be improved. I am currently using the solution. I have contacted the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is not overly complicated."
"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."
"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."
"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The solution is efficient."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros
"WatchGuard is very user-friendly. It provides us with all of the security services we need."
"The most valuable feature, in my opinion, is the dimension logging platform and the network traffic filtering."
"The tool provides automated responses."
"The most valuable feature is the correlation of logs from different devices."
"The most valuable features include the ability to raise alarms when there are issues, easier configuration compared to other vendors, centralized update management, and keeping the product updated efficiently."
"The protection that it provides from ransomware is valuable. The awareness that it has is also valuable. It didn't have a central console earlier, but now it has a central console, which is pretty good."
"The analytics are important because if there is an abnormality then it provides that information to us."
"When you download the executable file from the internet, it automatically sandboxes to make sure it's not doing anything incorrectly."
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"The product's reporting isn't great."
"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."
"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."
"They need to improve their technical support services."
"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."
"It initially took some time to deploy."
"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons
"It can have a couple of false positives, but after you add them to your allow list, it works fine. It could have better Mac support. I am pretty sure it doesn't have much support for Mac. It can be installed on a Mac, but it is not that good."
"The solution is a bit confusing and there are unusual complications with setup."
"The ease of detecting where an issue is should be improved."
"This product needs to be fully integrated with the firewall. Currently, it only sends logs to the cloud and asks the firewall to correlate them."
"I'd like a few extra features, especially around threat severity assessment."
"The pricing of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response could be improved."
"When it comes to live-monitoring, the user-interface could be improved to make things easier."
"The website must provide more information on the product."
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."
"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."
"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."
"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."
"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."
"The pricing is manageable."
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice
"The price of WatchGuard is very good."
"There is a license required to use the solution and we pay annually. The price could be reduced because it is a bit expensive."
"The solution is cheap."
"The price is very good."
"The solution is a bit more expensive than other options."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The price is comparable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Retailer
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...
See all answers
What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
The interface is user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
The tool provides automated responses.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
The pricing of WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response could be improved. It's not the cheapest option available. That said, it often meets our needs effectively. There are areas for improvement i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response?
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response is used to monitor traffic and give alarms to the administration if something goes wrong. It reacts when services protected by it are attacked and sends not...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 27% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 18% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 10% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 9% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
Compared 5% of the time
More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 43% of the time
Darktrace vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Darktrace vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Intercept X Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Logo
Intercept X Endpoint vs WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Compared 7% of the time
More WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
April 2025
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reportDownload Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report
Buyer's Guide
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
March 2025
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response reportDownload WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
WatchGuard TDR
 

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Hackers are designing malware to be more sophisticated than ever. Through packing, encryption, and polymorphism, cyber criminals are able to disguise their attacks to avoid detection. Zero day threats and advanced malware easily slip by antivirus solutions that are simply too slow to respond to the constant stream of emerging threats. Organizations of all sizes need a solution that leverages a holistic approach to security from the network to the endpoint. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response (TDR) is a powerful collection of advanced malware defense tools that correlate threat indicators from Firebox appliances and Host Sensors to stop known, unknown and evasive malware threats.

WatchGuard
 

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Goodwill New York / New Jersey, F4 IT, Café Comunicação Integrada
Buyer's Guide
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
April 2025
Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.