Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DarwinBox vs PeopleSoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
2.8
DarwinBox needs improvements in customization, integration, user interface, and management functions, with enhanced vendor collaboration and server stability.
Sentiment score
4.9
PeopleSoft users seek UI modernization, mobile integration, enhanced customization, better tech support, robust analytics, and streamlined processes.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
DarwinBox scales well for small to medium companies but faces challenges with large entities due to transition issues.
Sentiment score
7.5
PeopleSoft is highly scalable, effectively supporting diverse business sizes and integrating smoothly with various applications as needs grow.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.3
DarwinBox's stability experiences vary, with some users satisfied and others noting instability, while many find it too early to judge.
Sentiment score
8.1
PeopleSoft is generally stable and reliable, rated highly by users, though stability can vary during upgrades and customizations.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
DarwinBox features a user-friendly interface with social, help desk, organogram, attendance, and leave management, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.
Sentiment score
8.3
PeopleSoft provides customizable ERP solutions with seamless integration, user-friendly interfaces, and strong support, ideal for complex business processes.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
PeopleSoft's customer service is responsive but needs improvement in speed, response clarity, and efficiency for customized setups.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
PeopleSoft's high pricing and licensing costs may suit organizations with complex needs, ranging $3M-$4M annually.
 

Categories and Ranking

DarwinBox
Ranking in Talent Management
23rd
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
11th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Cloud HCM (16th), HR Analytics Software (8th)
PeopleSoft
Ranking in Talent Management
6th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
ERP (11th), Activity Based Costing Software (6th), Benefits Administration (4th), Demand Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of DarwinBox is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleSoft is 7.2%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Talent Management
 

Featured Reviews

SHANOOPCHATHOTH PARAMBIL - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing attendance and leave management but needs better performance customization
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles DarwinBox has provided a significant return on investment for our finance team. Managing payroll and attendance manually would require more team members, so using DarwinBox…
HarishMahanta - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages
I would like to see a chatbot in PeopleSoft as part of artificial intelligence. Moreover, there are already a few things in the cloud. In the market, all companies and entities are moving to the cloud, whether it is Oracle cloud or AWS cloud. The cloud is the most secure platform where we can also have Fusion. Few companies have migrated from PeopleSoft to Fusion or Oracle Cloud, or AWS cloud based on their organization's requirements. Some organizations are moving from PeopleSoft to upgrade their tools or application versions, while others are moving from PeopleSoft to HCM Cloud if they are into HCM. The cost of the product depends on the enterprise's size, and some enterprises are moving in quantity due to the current market. Additional areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DarwinBox?
The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping.
What needs improvement with DarwinBox?
Customization in performance management is cumbersome. Processes like six-month appraisals lack easy configurations, and any significant customization requires working with vendors.
What is your primary use case for DarwinBox?
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles.
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your organ...
What do you like most about PeopleSoft?
I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Myntra, GVK BIO, Bisleri, Times Internet, Delhivery, Aarti
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Find out what your peers are saying about DarwinBox vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.