Databricks vs IBM SPSS Modeler comparison

Databricks and IBM are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Databricks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Databricks holds a 9.3% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to IBM’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Databricks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Databricks

Read 93 Databricks reviews

18,865 Views
8,112 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM SPSS Modeler

Read 40 IBM SPSS Modeler reviews

2,695 Views
1,967 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Databricks

IBM SPSS Modeler

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

IBM SPSS Modeler and Databricks are data analytics competitors. Databricks has the upper hand due to its scalability and real-time processing for large-scale operations.

Features: IBM SPSS Modeler offers robust statistical tools, intuitive flowchart modeling, and effective predictive analytics. Databricks provides strong integration with big data technologies, advanced machine learning workflows, and collaboration through its notebook interface.

Room for Improvement: IBM SPSS Modeler could enhance its cloud capabilities and collaboration features. It may also benefit from more advanced machine learning tools. Databricks can improve by simplifying its initial adaptation to cloud environments, optimizing cost for smaller operations, and streamlining complex workflows for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SPSS Modeler is straightforward to deploy on-premise with minimal cloud infrastructure and offers attentive customer service. Databricks supports quick, cloud-native deployments with strong team collaboration but may require additional training for cloud acclimation.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SPSS Modeler generally presents lower initial setup costs with good ROI for small and mid-sized statistical analyses. Databricks, while involving higher upfront investment, often yields a higher long-term ROI through its scalability and big data capabilities, justifying the initial expense for extensive data operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Databricks

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (9th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (5th), Streaming Analytics (1st)

IBM SPSS Modeler

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Mining (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Databricks is 9.3%, down from 18.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SPSS Modeler is 3.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Databricks	9.3%
IBM SPSS Modeler	3.5%
Other	87.2%

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Satyam Wagh

Consultant at Nice Software Solutions

Unified data workflows have cut ticket processing times and are driving faster business insights

Databricks already provides monthly updates and continuously works on delivering new features while enhancing existing ones. However, the platform could become easier to use. While instruction-led workshops are available, offering more free instructional workshops would allow a wider audience to access and learn about Databricks. Additionally, providing use cases would help beginners gain more knowledge and hands-on experience. Regarding my experience, I was initially unfamiliar with the platform and had to conduct research and learn through various videos. I did find some instruction-led classes, but several of those required payment. The platform should provide more free resources to enable a broader audience to access and learn about Databricks. The platform itself is user-friendly and easy to use without complex issues, so I believe it does not need improvement in its core functionality. Rather, supporting aspects can be enhanced.

Read full review

Prof. Dr. Rudolf Bisping

Business Owner at SASS GmbH

Support and flexibility enable effective project initiation and meet customer needs but deployment requires enhancement

The customer comes to you and says they want to deploy it and make a production out of this, which is very difficult and expensive with IBM SPSS Modeler. With MATLAB, there is no problem. I have a solution, and then I convert my MATLAB solution to C programming language. This I can deploy, and I can check it, and it is MISRA compatible. It is very easy to deploy it, to go from MATLAB to C or C++, which is actually needed in the car industry. In the car industry, they want to have it in the hardware. You cannot put MATLAB or IBM SPSS Modeler in the hardware of a car, but with C, there is no problem with a microcontroller. They can shoot it into the microcontroller, and I can check it with Polyspace, and it is MISRA compatible, which is an industrial standard. There is nothing similar in IBM SPSS Modeler. I made solutions with IBM SPSS Modeler, and then the customer said they wanted to make a production out of it, and it was not possible. I stopped with IBM SPSS Modeler 18. It is now 18.6 from what I know at the moment. I do not believe that there is a possibility to design a graphic user interface with it. It is itself a graphic user interface, where you put all sorts of little icons into the display.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The fast data loading process and data storage capabilities are great."

"The initial setup phase of Databricks was good."

"Databricks is a robust solution for big data processing, offering flexibility and powerful features."

"There are good features for turning off clusters."

"Databricks is based on a Spark cluster and it is fast. Performance-wise, it is great."

"Databricks serves as a single platform for conducting the entire end-to-end lifecycle of machine learning models or AI ops."

"The ability to stream data and the windowing feature are valuable."

"The built-in optimization recommendations halved the speed of queries and allowed us to reach decision points and deliver insights very quickly."

More Databricks pros

"We have a local representative who specializes in SPSS. He will help us do the PoC."

"The most valuable features of the IBM SPSS Modeler are visual programming, you don't have to write any code, and it is easy to use. 90 to 95 percent of the use cases, you don't have to fine-tune anything. If you want to do something deeper, for example, create a better neural network, then you have to go into the features and try to fine-tune them. However, the default selection which is made by the tool, it's very practical and works well."

"It works fine. I have not had any stability issues; it is always up."

"We are using it either for workforce deployment or to improve our operations."

"It scales. I have not run into any challenges where it will not perform."

"You take two quarters and compare them and this tool is ideal because it gives you a lot of visibility on the before and after."

"So far, the stability has been rock solid."

"Our business units' capabilities with SPSS Modeler is high. They no longer waste time on modeling and algorithms, meaning they are not coding any more. For example, segmentation projects now take one to three months, rather than six months to a year, as before."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pros

Cons

"One area of improvement is the Databricks File System (DBFS), where command-line challenges arise when accessing files. Standardization of file paths on the system could help, as engineers sometimes struggle."

"CI/CD needs additional leverage and support."

"While Databricks is generally a robust solution, I have noticed a limitation with debugging in the Delta Live Table, which could be improved."

"Databricks' performance when serving the data to an analytics tool isn't as good as Snowflake's."

"This solution only supports queries in SQL and Python, which is a bit limiting."

"The tool should improve its integration with other products."

"Implementation of Databricks is still very code heavy."

"Databricks would benefit from enhanced metrics and tighter integration with Azure's diagnostics."

More Databricks cons

"The forecasting could be a bit easier."

"Expensive to deploy solutions. You need to buy an extra deployment unit."

"The integration with sources and visualisation needs some improvement. The scalability needs improvement."

"I can say the solution is outdated."

"I would not rate the technical support very well. The technicians have accents. When you do find someone, it is very hard to get somebody able to answer the technical questions."

"The challenge for the very technical data scientists: It is constraining for them."

"Customer support is hard to contact."

"Neural networks are quite simple, and now neural networks are evolving to these architecture related to deep learning, etc. They didn't incorporate this in IBM SPSS Modeler."

More IBM SPSS Modeler cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution uses a pay-per-use model with an annual subscription fee or package. Typically this solution is used on a cloud platform, such as Azure or AWS, but more people are choosing Azure because the price is more reasonable."

"Price-wise, I would rate Databricks a three out of five."

"Databricks is a very expensive solution. Pricing is an area that could definitely be improved. They could provide a lower end compute and probably reduce the price."

"We implement this solution on behalf of our customers who have their own Azure subscription and they pay for Databricks themselves. The pricing is more expensive if you have large volumes of data."

"Licensing on site I would counsel against, as on-site hardware issues tend to really delay and slow down delivery."

"Databricks uses a price-per-use model, where you can use as much compute as you need."

"The licensing costs of Databricks is a tiered licensing regime, so it is flexible."

"I do not exactly know the costs, but one of our clients pays between $100 USD and $200 USD monthly."

More Databricks pricing and cost advice

"This tool, being an IBM product, is pretty expensive."

"$5,000 annually."

"I am using the free version of IBM SPSS Modeler, it is the educational edition version."

"It is an expensive product."

"It got us a good amount of money with quick and efficient modeling."

"The government has funds and a budget, it's hard to say if it's expensive or cheap. In Canada, they have a yearly budget. They used to encourage people to use the modeler for development. If ten users use the server with ten licenses, it runs faster. But if forty users use the same appliance, everything slows down. People then think it's not easy to do things and prefer using remote tools like Python to extract data from the database. It's not about being expensive or cheap, but about people's knowledge and experience in how to do the work."

"It is a huge increase to time savings."

"Its price is okay for a company, but for personal use, it is considered somewhat expensive."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?

Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...

See all answers

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?

Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Modeler?

The government has funds and a budget, it's hard to say if it's expensive or cheap. In Canada, they have a yearly budget. They used to encourage people to use the modeler for development. If ten us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Modeler?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM SPSS Modeler?

I have been using IBM SPSS Modeler for a long time. I am using IBM SPSS Modeler mainly for ETL. Sometimes I use it to compare the results of the modeling as compared to MATLAB. MATLAB is the main t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dataiku vs Databricks

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Databricks

Compared 5% of the time

Dremio vs Databricks

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Databricks

Compared 4% of the time

Alteryx vs Databricks

Compared 3% of the time

More Databricks Competitors

IBM SPSS Statistics vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 47% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 8% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Watson Explorer vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM SPSS Modeler Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Databricks

January 2026

Download Databricks product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SPSS Modeler

January 2026

Download IBM SPSS Modeler product report

Also Known As

Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash

SPSS Modeler

Overview

Databricks offers a scalable, versatile platform that integrates seamlessly with Spark and multiple languages, supporting data engineering, machine learning, and analytics in a unified environment.

Databricks stands out for its scalability, ease of use, and powerful integration with Spark, multiple languages, and leading cloud services like Azure and AWS. It provides tools such as the Notebook for collaboration, Delta Lake for efficient data management, and Unity Catalog for data governance. While enhancing data engineering and machine learning workflows, it faces challenges in visualization and third-party integration, with pricing and user interface navigation being common concerns. Despite needing improvements in connectivity and documentation, it remains popular for tasks like real-time processing and data pipeline management.

What features make Databricks unique?

Notebook: Enables collaborative work among team members.
Delta Lake: Optimizes data management operations.
Unity Catalog: Provides governance over data assets.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly connects with major cloud platforms.

What benefits can users expect from Databricks?

Versatility: Supports diverse applications in data science and engineering.
Performance: Delivers efficient handling of large-scale analytics tasks.
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork in data projects.
Unified Environment: Centralizes machine learning and analytics activities.

In the tech industry, Databricks empowers teams to perform comprehensive data analytics, enabling them to conduct extensive ETL operations, run predictive modeling, and prepare data for SparkML. In retail, it supports real-time data processing and batch streaming, aiding in better decision-making. Enterprises across sectors leverage its capabilities for creating secure APIs and managing data lakes effectively.

Databricks

IBM SPSS Modeler is an extensive predictive analytics platform that is designed to bring predictive intelligence to decisions made by individuals, groups, systems and the enterprise. By providing a range of advanced algorithms and techniques that include text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization, SPSS Modeler can help you consistently make the right decisions from the desktop or within operational systems.

Buy
https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-modeler/pricing

Sign up for the trial
https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/us-en/signup?formid=urx-19947

IBM

Sample Customers

Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware

Reisebªro Idealtours GmbH, MedeAnalytics, Afni, Israel Electric Corporation, Nedbank Ltd., DigitalGlobe, Vodafone Hungary, Aegon Hungary, Bureau Veritas, Brammer Group, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, InSites Consulting, Fortis Turkey

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

December 2025

Free Report: Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Databricks vs. IBM SPSS Modeler report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.