DigiCert PKI Platform vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

"I emphasize the importance of automation in Wi-Fi management, particularly in tasks such as certificate renewal. The requirement extends to the ability to generate new certificates from a local server within the data center. There is a need to establish a new server for local certificate issuance and highlights the desire for automation in the deployment process. The emphasis lies in leveraging automated solutions to streamline these operations effectively."

"The most valuable feature is the communication based on PKI certificates."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"The customer finds value in adopting a platform from Jira, particularly for the ease it brings to their processes, both for on-premises operations and batch processing. Their objective is to create a new customized server specifically designed for generating certificates. This server is intended for the generation of certificates, emphasizing that it is not meant for free domain replacement. The platform of choice for this purpose is Digital One, a product that offers full customization and aligns well with the customer's preference for tailored solutions.The process of certificate issuance from Microsoft's AB involves renewal or replacement every five years. However, an issue arises in that this particular certificate requires renewal annually instead of the standard five-year cycle. The challenge is attributed to personnel changes, where an administrator responsible for the process resigns within the five-year period. To address this, we seeks an automated solution that operates seamlessly with a single sign-on approach, eliminating the need for user IDs or passwords. The automation involves approval and subsequent deployment without complexities. Us, being a partner of DigiSet, relies on their implementer for support in service deployment, installation, and resolution of any issues that may arise."

"From an automation perspective, PKI is a bit of a debatable topic and can be improved as time demands."

"The product is not customizable."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"In Ping Identity, we have had some issues. We've worked with logging and troubleshooting, including some firewall and security issues."

"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"I would rate it seven for the price."

"This solution won't cost much, as this would be free with the licensing from Microsoft."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The product is costly."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The tool is quite affordable."