Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center comparison

Digital.ai and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Digital.ai is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Digital.ai holds a 1.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Agility

Read 5 Digital.ai Agility reviews

1,225 Views
877 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

7,225 Views
2,979 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Agility

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Digital.ai Agility are competing in the application lifecycle management and agile project management domains. Digital.ai Agility seems to have the upper hand due to its adaptive features and ROI satisfaction based on data comparisons.

Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center offers comprehensive requirement management, test planning, and quality assurance integrations. Digital.ai Agility features advanced agile management tools, seamless collaboration features, and superior DevOps integration.

Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM could improve in reducing deployment time by enhancing cloud compatibility and streamlining infrastructure requirements. It can also enhance user interface adaptability and expand agile management capabilities. Digital.ai Agility could refine its traditional ALM features, enhance documentation, and expand its support for larger enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM / Quality Center typically has longer deployment times due to specific infrastructural settings needed, with a more structured support approach. Digital.ai Agility benefits from cloud-based deployment for a faster setup and provides agile-focused, responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center often involves a higher setup cost but offers extensive ALM solutions justifying the expense for traditional tool-seekers. Digital.ai Agility is noted for better ROI through flexible pricing and lower initial costs, aligning well with agile workflows, making it cost-effective for iterative project needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Agility

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (9th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (9th), Value Stream Management Software (5th)

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Agility is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Debbie Brey

Technical Fellow at Boeing

A scalable, full-package solution with a tech support team that bends over backwards to help

There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it. The feature I would like to see is already in their newer licensing structure, and that's the live integration between Agility, Jira and Azure DevOps. That's the piece that I think is really valuable.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage

The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows my clients to have one central tool to manage their agile projects."

"It can generate reports showing a burndown chart, burnup chart, and the planned vs actual velocity."

"With some of the other tools, you have to buy 20 different plugins to get to the same capability that comes with the basic Agility capability."

"Agility is highly flexible. It can do much more than what our client is doing with it. They use it in a defined way. Some at that company have a much broader knowledge of agile and SAFe, but they're given applications and a mandated way to work. We had to work within their parameters and provide an accurate transition so the data would be mapped and pushed through."

"For visualization capabilities, the automation capabilities make it possible to support the different personas. The features and capabilities are excellent and come with excellent support."

"Having the links maintained within the tool is a huge boon to reporting requirements, tests, and defects."

"It's basically the way to show the work that we do as QA testers, and to have a historical view of those executions."

"The tool's most valuable feature is that it is user-friendly, and everybody can learn to use it easily."

"It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel, allowing us to download reports easily."

"I like the traceability, especially between requirements, testing, and defects."

"Business process management is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"We are able to use Micro Focus ALM Quality Center for test management, defect management, test process, test governance activities, and requirement management. We are able to achieve all of this, the solution is very useful."

"The most valuable user feature that we use right now is the camera."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pros

Cons

"The user interface can be improved by adding Save, Edit, Add, Cancel, and Return buttons to the popup windows that are displayed when you click on a child item."

"There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it."

"The machine learning features are a new capability but could be improved. This is being worked by Digital.ai currently. Multicolor simulation, specifically, could be improved."

"Improve how to create and track releases. Currently, I have to create child projects."

"In my work as a contractor, it's always frustrating when a client has multiple software applications that don't talk to each other and they all perform the same function. That presents a huge challenge between their IT groups."

"The Agile methodology is now being used across all the organizations, but in this solution, we don't have a dashboard like Jira. In Jira, you can move your product backlogs from one space to another and see the progress, that is, whether a backlog is in the development stage or testing stage. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center does not have this feature. It is typically very straightforward. You just execute the test cases from it, and you just make them pass, fail, or whatever. They can also improve its integration with Jira. The browser support needs to be improved in this because it supports only Internet Explorer as of now. It does not have support for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, or any other browser. There are also some performance issues in it. Let's say that you are doing the testing, and you found something and are logging the defect. When you try to attach several or multiple screenshots with the defect, it slows down, which is a very common problem people face. I would like them to include a functionality where I am able to see the reports across all the projects. When you have multiple projects, being a manager, I would like to see the reports across all the projects. Currently, there is no single sign-on through which we can get all the information at one place. You need to log into it project-wise. If you have ten projects, you can't view the information in one dashboard."

"Currently, what's missing in the solution is the ability for users to see the ongoing scenarios and the status of those scenarios versus the requirements. As for the management tools, they also need to be improved so users can have a better idea of what's going on in just one look, so they can manage testing activities better."

"Costing is an area that needs improvement."

"ALM Quality Center could be improved with more techniques to manage Agile processes."

"The solution needs to offer support for Agile. Currently, ALM only supports Waterfall."

"The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult."

"Sometimes I do run my queries from the admin login. However, if I want to reassess all my test cases, then I am still doing this in a manual manner. I write SQL queries, then fire them off. Therefore, a library of those SQL queries would help. If we could have a typical SQL query to change the parameters within test cases, then this is one aspect I can still think that could be included in ALM. Though they would need to be analyzed and used in a very knowledgeable way."

"Cross project reporting is limited to similar database schemas"

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool."

"Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle."

"Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product."

"For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."

"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."

"We have divided our licenses between Micro Focus ALM and ALM Octane. It works for us."

"It's a perpetual license."

"The pricing is expensive nowadays."

"I feel that the licenses are expensive. "

"Pricing is managed by our headquarters. I am able to get from them for very cheap. The market price is horribly expensive."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Insurance Company

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

63%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult. Issues with mapping multiple functional test cases to one automated test case nee...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 61% of the time

Jira Align vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Portfolio vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 5% of the time

More Digital.ai Agility Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 22% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility

December 2024

Download Digital.ai Agility product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

December 2024

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Also Known As

VersionOne Lifecycle, VersionOne, CollabNet VersionOne, Digital.ai Continuum

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

Learn More

Digital.ai

OpenText

Overview

Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Digital.ai Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Sample Customers

Siemens Health Services (HS), Cerner Corporation, Aaron's, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Kelley Blue Book, AOL, Axway, Tideworks, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG, Intergraph, Eos Group, PeopleCube, Liquid Machines

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center

December 2024

Free Report: Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Agility vs. OpenText ALM / Quality Center report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.