DigitalOcean vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

DigitalOcean and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. DigitalOcean is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9. DigitalOcean holds a 2.2% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of DigitalOcean users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

DigitalOcean

Read 12 DigitalOcean reviews

1,618 Views
1,585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 40 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,637 Views
2,236 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

DigitalOcean

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

DigitalOcean and SAP S4HANA on AWS are prominent cloud solutions. In pricing and ease of use, DigitalOcean often comes out ahead, while SAP S4HANA on AWS leads in features and scalability.

Features: DigitalOcean offers a user-friendly interface, reliable Linux-based cloud servers, and Kubernetes integration, supporting developers with its streamlined services. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides a robust HANA database, advanced in-memory processing capabilities, and comprehensive ERP solutions, facilitating detailed analytics and business insights for large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: DigitalOcean could enhance its feature set and scalability options to cater more to complex enterprise needs. Additional advanced automation tools would be beneficial. The documentation could be more extensive for deeper service understanding. SAP S4HANA on AWS may streamline its deployment process to reduce complexity. Enhancing real-time processing features and expanding integrations could also accelerate adoption. The product’s cost and resource requirements sometimes necessitate more efficient license models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DigitalOcean excels in providing a fast, straightforward deployment process paired with responsive customer service, catering well to smaller teams. SAP S4HANA on AWS, although more complex, benefits from AWS’s extensive support framework, crucial for managing comprehensive ERP deployments.

Pricing and ROI: DigitalOcean's pricing structure is straightforward and cost-effective, appealing to startups and developers looking for predictable expenses. In contrast, SAP S4HANA on AWS involves a substantial initial investment but offers significant ROI through its expansive and scalable ERP capabilities, suitable for enterprises pursuing long-term strategic value.

To learn more, read our detailed DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DigitalOcean

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of DigitalOcean is 2.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.9%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Michael Olayemi

Senior Software Engineer at Checkit

Enjoy cost-effective hosting with flexible deployment and room for payment model improvement

I use only one feature, which is the droplet, and it has been satisfactory. The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well. I also have total freedom over what I use, and I have a better user interface and documentation compared to Oracle.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer support team are very responsive."

"DigitalOcean is much cheaper compared to Oracle, Amazon, and Google, making it a better option for a startup."

"The solution is very stable."

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which you can create a phishing server and use it."

"I like Kubernetes integration."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"The user interface is nice, and it is very easy to use. Anyone can use it."

"The most outstanding aspect of DigitalOcean is its user interface and ease of use. Compared to more complex solutions, such as AWS, DigitalOcean's platform is highly intuitive and user-friendly."

More DigitalOcean pros

"I recommend SAP S4HANA if your team is well-prepared and your internal organization is educated before implementation."

"We deployed the database from another team called ECC into an SAP HANA system. The implementation project took about eighteen months. That team handled the technical aspects."

"The solution adds great value to any organization."

"Especially for manufacturing, it offers great integration with my costing."

"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."

"This product is much better than most of the other products in this categaory as far as financial capabilities."

"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."

"The Fiori interface is the most valuable feature. It's one of the highlights that they offer. The in-memory of S4 is very fast."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments."

"I think something needs to be done in terms of technical support."

"I would like to see an automation feature added to send emails out using the open-source solution."

"The technical support for this solution could be improved."

"I would like to see improvements to the logging and user interface. The verification process could be more streamlined."

"The platform could enhance its features, particularly for ETL processes. Additionally, more integration features would be highly beneficial."

"The issue with DigitalOcean is primarily the latency. So, when you have a mixed system with some components staying here, and then we encounter network latency, it's not optimal. Our"

"We found the solution to be a bit expensive."

More DigitalOcean cons

"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."

"Sometimes, the tool has bugs."

"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."

"There are times when the solution can become slower. The stability could improve."

"The documentation isn't clear enough."

"Over the last three to four years, I haven't encountered significant issues with SAP S/4HANA. While occasional system bugs are normal in software, the overall experience has been positive. As a business partner, it stands out as a reliable ERP solution."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a pay as you go solution. There is no license and it is usage based."

"The price of DigitalOcean could be lower. It is expensive. it's higher than other solutions available in the market. We pay approximately $20 to $25 a month to use the solution. The price we pay is for the shared CPU option."

"The pricing is cheap."

"The program is cheaper than others."

"There is no licensing fee but there is a subscription cost based on how much RAM and storage you require."

"The solution provides the cheapest cloud in comparison to the other cloud solutions."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"I would rate DigitalOcean's pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive."

More DigitalOcean pricing and cost advice

"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."

"We pay an annual subscription fee for the solution, which is slightly expensive."

"I would rate the pricing as a two and a half out of five."

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS has reasonable pricing."

"I rate the price of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DigitalOcean?

It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DigitalOcean?

DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility without fixed paym...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DigitalOcean?

I primarily use DigitalOcean to deploy applications. I rent the system from them, where I deploy my web servers and application servers. I use it to host my applications since moving from Oracle. I...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

There are many things already there. There just needs to be a document approval workflow, which is not limited to procurement and other documents. There might be an additional document approval wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs DigitalOcean

Compared 37% of the time

Amazon AWS vs DigitalOcean

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs DigitalOcean

Compared 12% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs DigitalOcean

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs DigitalOcean

Compared 6% of the time

More DigitalOcean Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 70% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 9% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean

April 2025

Download DigitalOcean product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

March 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

Digital Ocean

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

DigitalOcean has the fastest and most convenient cloud technology to help you easily and more efficiently manage your infrastructure so you can get back to coding. We provide all of our users with high-performance SSD Hard Drives, a flexible API, and the ability to select the nearest data center location.

DigitalOcean

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

jQuery Foundation, Pertino, TaskRabbit, Compose, InfluxDB, The Able Few

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

April 2025

Free Report: DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.