DigitalOcean vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

DigitalOcean and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. DigitalOcean is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.1, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. DigitalOcean holds a 2.2% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of DigitalOcean users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

DigitalOcean

Read 12 DigitalOcean reviews

1,779 Views
1,791 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 39 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

3,147 Views
2,714 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

DigitalOcean

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

DigitalOcean and SAP S4HANA on AWS are prominent cloud solutions. In pricing and ease of use, DigitalOcean often comes out ahead, while SAP S4HANA on AWS leads in features and scalability.

Features: DigitalOcean offers a user-friendly interface, reliable Linux-based cloud servers, and Kubernetes integration, supporting developers with its streamlined services. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides a robust HANA database, advanced in-memory processing capabilities, and comprehensive ERP solutions, facilitating detailed analytics and business insights for large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: DigitalOcean could enhance its feature set and scalability options to cater more to complex enterprise needs. Additional advanced automation tools would be beneficial. The documentation could be more extensive for deeper service understanding. SAP S4HANA on AWS may streamline its deployment process to reduce complexity. Enhancing real-time processing features and expanding integrations could also accelerate adoption. The product’s cost and resource requirements sometimes necessitate more efficient license models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DigitalOcean excels in providing a fast, straightforward deployment process paired with responsive customer service, catering well to smaller teams. SAP S4HANA on AWS, although more complex, benefits from AWS’s extensive support framework, crucial for managing comprehensive ERP deployments.

Pricing and ROI: DigitalOcean's pricing structure is straightforward and cost-effective, appealing to startups and developers looking for predictable expenses. In contrast, SAP S4HANA on AWS involves a substantial initial investment but offers significant ROI through its expansive and scalable ERP capabilities, suitable for enterprises pursuing long-term strategic value.

To learn more, read our detailed DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DigitalOcean

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of DigitalOcean is 2.2%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 4.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Michael Olayemi

Senior Software Engineer at Checkit

Enjoy cost-effective hosting with flexible deployment and room for payment model improvement

I use only one feature, which is the droplet, and it has been satisfactory. The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well. I also have total freedom over what I use, and I have a better user interface and documentation compared to Oracle.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer support team are very responsive."

"The user interface is nice, and it is very easy to use. Anyone can use it."

"The technical support services are good."

"DigitalOcean is much cheaper compared to Oracle, Amazon, and Google, making it a better option for a startup."

"The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well."

"The most outstanding aspect of DigitalOcean is its user interface and ease of use. Compared to more complex solutions, such as AWS, DigitalOcean's platform is highly intuitive and user-friendly."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"The solution is very stable."

More DigitalOcean pros

"The solution adds great value to any organization."

"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."

"The solution is scalable."

"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."

"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."

"The reporting capability is good, providing very in-depth information."

"The HANA database is a valuable feature"

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"The technical support for this solution could be improved."

"I would like to see improvements to the logging and user interface. The verification process could be more streamlined."

"I would like to see an automation feature added to send emails out using the open-source solution."

"We found the solution to be a bit expensive."

"I think something needs to be done in terms of technical support."

"The deployment time can be improved in DigitalOcean. While deployment is automated, the process can take a minute and a half to five minutes, and for more complex applications, this time increases even further. This is not optimal for applications that receive frequent updates."

"The solution could improve by having integration with GitHub."

"DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments."

More DigitalOcean cons

"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."

"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."

"CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP."

"The solution is costlier than other products."

"Sometimes, the tool has bugs."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."

"The initial setup could be easier. It's complex."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the cheapest option available, which costs $50 per month."

"I would rate DigitalOcean's pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"There is no licensing fee but there is a subscription cost based on how much RAM and storage you require."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"The pricing is cheap."

"The pricing is moderate and reasonable for a mid-tier cloud platform."

"The price of DigitalOcean could be lower. It is expensive. it's higher than other solutions available in the market. We pay approximately $20 to $25 a month to use the solution. The price we pay is for the shared CPU option."

"This is a pay as you go solution. There is no license and it is usage based."

More DigitalOcean pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product price a six on a one to ten scale, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS has reasonable pricing."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"Compared to its competitors, SAP S4HANA on AWS is a costly solution."

"I would rate the pricing as a two and a half out of five."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DigitalOcean?

It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DigitalOcean?

DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility without fixed paym...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DigitalOcean?

I primarily use DigitalOcean to deploy applications. I rent the system from them, where I deploy my web servers and application servers. I use it to host my applications since moving from Oracle. I...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The user-friendliness is questionable. The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training. They should also improve their user interface.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs DigitalOcean

Compared 34% of the time

Amazon AWS vs DigitalOcean

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs DigitalOcean

Compared 15% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs DigitalOcean

Compared 11% of the time

Utho vs DigitalOcean

Compared 3% of the time

More DigitalOcean Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 69% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean

January 2025

Download DigitalOcean product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

December 2024

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

Digital Ocean

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Learn More

DigitalOcean

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

DigitalOcean has the fastest and most convenient cloud technology to help you easily and more efficiently manage your infrastructure so you can get back to coding. We provide all of our users with high-performance SSD Hard Drives, a flexible API, and the ability to select the nearest data center location.

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Sample Customers

jQuery Foundation, Pertino, TaskRabbit, Compose, InfluxDB, The Able Few

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Free Report: DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DigitalOcean vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.