DigitalOcean vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

"It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which performs very well in this context. All the assets go on DigitalOcean."

"The user interface is nice, and it is very easy to use. Anyone can use it."

"The technical support services are good."

"I like Kubernetes integration."

"The customer support team are very responsive."

"The solution's app platform simplifies many tasks a developer must handle manually. For instance, when serving a website, the app platform uses NGINX to manage the app's serving, caching, and automatic rerunning in case of failure."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"The solution is very stable."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA is Fiori. It allows users to access information quickly and easily, without having to navigate through unnecessary screens or transactions. Additionally, the ability to retrieve data more efficiently is helpful. Furthermore, the pre-delivered videos and functionalities within the solution allow for easier application building."

"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."

"The most valuable features of SAP S/4HANA on AWS include its availability and performance."

"This product is currently the leading product within this category."

"The solution is scalable."

"We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable."

"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."

"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."

"The platform could enhance its features, particularly for ETL processes. Additionally, more integration features would be highly beneficial."

"I think something needs to be done in terms of technical support."

"I would like to see improvements to the logging and user interface. The verification process could be more streamlined."

"The technical support for this solution could be improved."

"The issue with DigitalOcean is primarily the latency. So, when you have a mixed system with some components staying here, and then we encounter network latency, it's not optimal. Our"

"I would like to see an automation feature added to send emails out using the open-source solution."

"The solution could improve by having integration with GitHub."

"We found the solution to be a bit expensive."

"The initial setup could be easier. It's complex."

"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."

"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."

"Doesn't have a common development environment."

"The GUI is age-old, the pricing is too high for hardware and older customizations are not working consistently."

"This is a pay as you go solution. There is no license and it is usage based."

"I would rate DigitalOcean's pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"The price of DigitalOcean could be lower. It is expensive. it's higher than other solutions available in the market. We pay approximately $20 to $25 a month to use the solution. The price we pay is for the shared CPU option."

"The pricing is cheap."

"The program is cheaper than others."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"There is no licensing fee but there is a subscription cost based on how much RAM and storage you require."

"The pricing is moderate and reasonable for a mid-tier cloud platform."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"Compared to its competitors, SAP S4HANA on AWS is a costly solution."

"The vendors have different pricing, ways of serving, security, and providing the service. You go and compare the offerings. Some might be better with smaller companies. For example, Microsoft Azure can handle small and medium-sized companies best but still can cover some large companies. Whereas Amazon AWS and IBM are going to cover sized companies. There's no clear advantage. Probably Amazon AWS may have been the first to be certified by SAP as a cloud-hosting partner. Then Microsoft Azure and IBM were certified at the same time. You have to partner up and be certified by the software."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"We pay a monthly fee for the use of SAP S4HANA on AWS for approximately five years. That's the time of the contract."

"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."

"We pay an annual subscription fee for the solution, which is slightly expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the solution's pricing an eight."