Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon AWS is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Amazon AWS holds a 18.8% mindshare in ISI, compared to SAP S4HANA on AWS’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon AWS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of SAP S4HANA on AWS users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 254 Amazon AWS reviews

18,948 Views
16,386 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 39 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

3,147 Views
2,714 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS compete in cloud computing services, with AWS offering broader cloud infrastructure and SAP S4HANA tailored for enterprise ERP solutions. AWS appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and customer service, while SAP S4HANA excels in integrated ERP capabilities and in-memory computing.

Features: Amazon AWS provides elasticity, dynamic usage, and superior security measures. It supports services like EC2, S3, and RDS, known for their scalability and adaptability. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers integrated ERP functionality, using in-memory computing speed with the HANA database, which is beneficial for industries requiring detailed process automation and insights.

Room for Improvement: Amazon AWS faces high learning curves and complex pricing, potentially challenging for startups. It could improve security offerings, billing processes, and user experience design. SAP S4HANA on AWS could lower costs to attract SMBs, enhance cloud platform integration, and simplify its licensing model, while also improving user interface and business module adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon AWS offers seamless integration across cloud types, crucial for enterprises requiring flexibility. It is praised for excellent customer support, with some delays mentioned. SAP S4HANA on AWS supports various deployment models tailored for businesses with complex ERP needs, yet its customer service, although robust, can be less responsive than AWS due to intricate enterprise environments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon AWS is cost-effective with pay-as-you-go flexibility, offering immediate ROI but with potentially surprising costs due to intricate pricing models. SAP S4HANA on AWS is more costly, valuable for large enterprises needing detailed ERP solutions. Its pricing model, though complex, offers long-term ROI for larger organizations but may deter smaller companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

254

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (2nd)

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 18.8%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 4.0%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav

CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited

Allows for automatic scaling of resources and provides built-in firewalls and security features, eliminating the need for external security solutions

One thing that's a bit different is that we're still accustomed to speaking to someone directly. AWS doesn't offer that kind of support. It's only through bots. You're speaking to chatbots, and that can sometimes be frustrating because there's no person on the other side. AI is not a substitute for a person. AWS marketplace is very strong, but somehow AWS doesn't promote it much. They have a huge customer base across the globe, and if products were launched in their marketplace, they could sell like hotcakes. They should improve their marketplace and promote the same product across the globe. They can take a cut, but they should promote it. That's something they don't do very much. So, AWS should promote its marketplace software. The company should promote it aggressively. Currently, they keep it very subtle. If you ask for it, they'll help you out. But they don't seem to advertise, "You're building a product on our platform? Why don't you sell it in our marketplace?" Improvement in AI: AWS is a little behind Microsoft Azure in terms of AI. AWS is still getting there, but the kind of examples and help files available in Azure for AI are much better. So AWS still needs to work on its AI functionality.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud Management has been a valuable feature."

"Works very quickly and is well managed."

"Amazon AWS has good performance and easy management."

"The technical support is good."

"It is stable. For the cloud version, we require some installation platforms and we don't have a server with us right now. We require it from Amazon AWS. We can just plan and get the AWS server."

"We can spin up the server anytime and have root access to it."

"It is highly available and on-demand. So, you can scale up and scale down whenever required."

"It has many choices of computer options, storage options, and even database options."

More Amazon AWS pros

"This product is much better than most of the other products in this categaory as far as financial capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."

"I recommend SAP S4HANA if your team is well-prepared and your internal organization is educated before implementation."

"This product is currently the leading product within this category."

"After the implementation phase of the product, it becomes a very stable tool."

"They have their own instances where you can host your database."

"The internal integration within departments and integration with third parties is simplified in the system."

"I like that they are very familiar with our VM which makes it easy to use."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"In future releases, I would like to see more automation."

"Monitoring still needs to be improved."

"The dashboard can be improved a little bit to provide more information."

"There's not much room for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process of the overall product features and backend."

"There was some new learning in terms of IOPS on the EBS storage. The concept of burstable IOPS was new and we did have a few outages when we ran out of IOPS."

"The price needs improvement."

"I'd like to see integration with MySQL."

"AWS could be more scalable."

More Amazon AWS cons

"The documentation isn't clear enough."

"We had some storage and legacy migrations problems with SAP S4HANA on AWS."

"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having more data centers because there are limited data centers in the region I am in. Amazon AWS has announced a few more data centers to be added, but they're still not 100 percent operational for SAP solutions."

"The solution needs a warehouse management feature. Right now, there's a built-in WM, but they don't have an EWM extended warehouse management built-in, in S/4HANA. It's a separate product. So if they can add that, that would be great."

"CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP."

"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."

"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is on a monthly basis."

"The tool’s pricing is reasonable."

"Technical support is expensive."

"It can get quite pricey at times."

"The solution is expensive compared to other providers because you need many of the services and it can add up fast."

"Licensing can be purchased on a yearly basis, which is an auto-renewal. We also have an on-demand on-pay purchase."

"It could be cheaper, and Amazon could also be more transparent with its pricing. I would first expect any product vendor to give me the utmost transparency on pricing information. There shouldn't be any hidden costs. Their service offerings have a bit of segmentation, and they focus more on SMBs. They brought them onto the cloud and encouraged them to use solutions on the cloud. But strategically, they should probably improve that and offer some credits."

"I find that Amazon AWS is expensive."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"There are additional modules-wise, it's needed for modules, and also for any new functions."

"We pay a monthly fee for the use of SAP S4HANA on AWS for approximately five years. That's the time of the contract."

"We pay an annual subscription fee for the solution, which is slightly expensive."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."

"I rate the price of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten."

"I rate the product price a six on a one to ten scale, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

29%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The user-friendliness is questionable. The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training. They should also improve their user interface.

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS

Compared 9% of the time

Dell ECS vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 69% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

DigitalOcean vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

January 2025

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

December 2024

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is an adopted cloud platform that offers more than 200 fully featured services from data centers located across the globe. This is a scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that is utilized by thousands of businesses of different sizes around the world. The product offers a wide variety of solutions for its customers, which allows them to launch applications regardless of their industry.

The most common use cases for AWS are:

Application hosting: Clients can take advantage of on-demand infrastructure to power their applications. The product supports multiple types of apps, varying from hosted internal applications to software as a service (SaaS) offerings.
Websites: With AWS, clients can satisfy their web hosting needs through a scalable platform for their websites.
Backup and storage: AWS offers reliable data storage services, which allow clients to store their data and build dependable backups for all of their valuable information.
Enterprise IT: The product allows companies to host internal- or external-facing IT applications in a highly secure environment.
Content delivery: Users who want to distribute content to end users worldwide can do so quickly and easily through the high data transfer speeds of this solution.
Databases: AWS offers a variety of database solutions, which include hosted enterprise database software as well as non-relational database solutions.

Amazon AWS supports a global cloud infrastructure with AWS Region and Availability Zone models, which contribute to the high availability of enterprise applications running on the solution. Amazon AWS has an extensive array of products that serve different purposes, including:

Analytics
Application integration
Blockchain
Business applications
Cloud financial management
Compute
Contact center
Containers
Database
Developer tools
End-user computing
Front-end web and mobile
Games
Internet of Things (IoT)
Machine learning
Management and governance
Quantum technologies
Robotics
Satellite
Security, identity and compliance, and others

The products and services that Amazon AWS delivers to these sectors provide a large computing capacity which is quicker and cheaper compared to building a physical server farm. Among the most popular services are Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, also known as "EC2," and Amazon Simple Storage Service, also known as "S3."

Amazon AWS Features

The wide array of products that Amazon AWS offers consist of different functions that utilize cloud computing across different sectors. The features of this solution can be categorized in the following ways:

Data and relationship management: With Amazon AWS, companies can manage multiple hierarchies of directory data, they can define attributes for objects and relationships, set custom inheritance rules for directories, and create multiple schemas.
Schema management: This group of features allows users to extend their directory schema according to their needs. They can extend it through multiple applications that share a single directory while avoiding duplication of data.
Fully managed infrastructure: This feature decreases time and costs for administrative tasks for companies regarding scaling infrastructure and managing servers.
Searching feature: The Cloud Directory feature of AWS offers built-in search capabilities which can cover sets of highly connected data and eliminate the need of creating nested queries.
Built-in data encryption: Users can benefit from high levels of protection of their data with AWS's products. The data in the cloud is automatically encrypted at rest and in transit through 256-bit encryption keys, managed by AWS Key Management Service (KMS).
Object policies: This feature allows Amazon AWS users to organize objects in different hierarchies by providing a framework for applications to evaluate policy assignments.

Amazon AWS Benefits

This product delivers various benefits across all industries that utilize its services. The greatest advantages of using Amazon AWS include:

High product functionality is supported by machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), IoT, data lakes, and analytics.
The solution has a high level of security, which is backed by a deep set ofmore than 100 cloud security tools.
Amazon AWS has an easy-to-use interface that makes it possible for clients to host applications.
The product is very flexible in terms of which operating system, programming language, web app platform, and database clients can use.
AWS is a scalable and highly secure global computing infrastructure, supported by the reliability of Amazon.com.
Clients can utilize the Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing tools to personally scale up or down applications, depending on their demand.
Users can choose from an array of payment options, including paying for only the services they need, as well as a free trial to select the ones most useful for them.

Reviews from Real Users

Greg G., a chief executive officer at a tech services company, ranks Amazon AWS highly, as he states that the solution is flexible, scales well, and offers good stability.

A technology manager technology at a computer software company values Amazon AWS because it is extremely cost-efficient, easy to upgrade and expand storage with greatly improved interfaces.

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.