Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon AWS is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9. Amazon AWS holds a 15.3% mindshare in ISI, compared to SAP S4HANA on AWS’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon AWS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of SAP S4HANA on AWS users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 254 Amazon AWS reviews

18,039 Views
15,575 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 40 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,966 Views
2,568 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS compete in cloud computing services, with AWS offering broader cloud infrastructure and SAP S4HANA tailored for enterprise ERP solutions. AWS appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and customer service, while SAP S4HANA excels in integrated ERP capabilities and in-memory computing.

Features: Amazon AWS provides elasticity, dynamic usage, and superior security measures. It supports services like EC2, S3, and RDS, known for their scalability and adaptability. SAP S4HANA on AWS offers integrated ERP functionality, using in-memory computing speed with the HANA database, which is beneficial for industries requiring detailed process automation and insights.

Room for Improvement: Amazon AWS faces high learning curves and complex pricing, potentially challenging for startups. It could improve security offerings, billing processes, and user experience design. SAP S4HANA on AWS could lower costs to attract SMBs, enhance cloud platform integration, and simplify its licensing model, while also improving user interface and business module adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon AWS offers seamless integration across cloud types, crucial for enterprises requiring flexibility. It is praised for excellent customer support, with some delays mentioned. SAP S4HANA on AWS supports various deployment models tailored for businesses with complex ERP needs, yet its customer service, although robust, can be less responsive than AWS due to intricate enterprise environments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon AWS is cost-effective with pay-as-you-go flexibility, offering immediate ROI but with potentially surprising costs due to intricate pricing models. SAP S4HANA on AWS is more costly, valuable for large enterprises needing detailed ERP solutions. Its pricing model, though complex, offers long-term ROI for larger organizations but may deter smaller companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

254

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (2nd)

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 15.3%, down from 22.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.7%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav

CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited

Allows for automatic scaling of resources and provides built-in firewalls and security features, eliminating the need for external security solutions

One thing that's a bit different is that we're still accustomed to speaking to someone directly. AWS doesn't offer that kind of support. It's only through bots. You're speaking to chatbots, and that can sometimes be frustrating because there's no person on the other side. AI is not a substitute for a person. AWS marketplace is very strong, but somehow AWS doesn't promote it much. They have a huge customer base across the globe, and if products were launched in their marketplace, they could sell like hotcakes. They should improve their marketplace and promote the same product across the globe. They can take a cut, but they should promote it. That's something they don't do very much. So, AWS should promote its marketplace software. The company should promote it aggressively. Currently, they keep it very subtle. If you ask for it, they'll help you out. But they don't seem to advertise, "You're building a product on our platform? Why don't you sell it in our marketplace?" Improvement in AI: AWS is a little behind Microsoft Azure in terms of AI. AWS is still getting there, but the kind of examples and help files available in Azure for AI are much better. So AWS still needs to work on its AI functionality.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the auto-scaling functionality and compliance requirements, whichever they are requesting."

"The compute and the elasticness of the compute is really great. Whenever there's a load, it automatically adds the servers and then reduces the servers based on the configuration. This is really wonderful, more cost-effective, and it's been really good for us."

"Great scalability."

"The main reason why we use EC2 is because we are not dependent on maintaining the hardware inside our premises. Also, we have full control over the infrastructure, and we can modify it as per our own requirements."

"Technical support is quite helpful."

"One of the most valuable features is that Amazon AWS has a lot of data centers and regions where we can position our virtual machines for leverage. Amazon AWS is also easy to use. You can quickly spin up something, use Explorer, building proofs of concept, things like that. Once the proof of concept is built once and we know how things are going to look from a production perspective, we try to move everything to the data centers. These features and the ease of use are the main reasons why we use AWS."

"You can instantly scale resources up or down as needed, avoiding the need to build infrastructure from scratch."

"AWS's security model, including IAM or security groups, has contributed to our organization's compliance. It manages authentication, permissions, and overall security posture, which helps us maintain compliance."

More Amazon AWS pros

"The tool covers many modules, like production, planning, management, and finance. It is a very scalable tool that can be beneficial for any company."

"Especially for manufacturing, it offers great integration with my costing."

"The support is top-notch."

"The solution is scalable."

"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."

"I recommend SAP S4HANA if your team is well-prepared and your internal organization is educated before implementation."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA is Fiori. It allows users to access information quickly and easily, without having to navigate through unnecessary screens or transactions. Additionally, the ability to retrieve data more efficiently is helpful. Furthermore, the pre-delivered videos and functionalities within the solution allow for easier application building."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"They have a low code platform, but it is for intervention."

"I would like to receive some alerts when my consumption is getting out of the normal range."

"As a result of the competency, I believe that most people are now leaning toward Azure rather than AWS."

"An integrated platform would make it easier for administrators to monitor and manage."

"The pricing could be adjusted to provide more advantages versus current on-premise solutions for business applications."

"Setup is somewhat complex."

"There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us."

"The networking is overly complex."

More Amazon AWS cons

"Currently, AWS has data centers in only a limited number of regions compared to other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud."

"The user-friendliness is questionable. The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training."

"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."

"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."

"The product can be very complex."

"The user-friendliness is questionable."

"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."

"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For our infrastructure, the cost is approximately $25 per device, and you have to include the other tools that we have in the cloud, for a total of approximately $200,000 per year."

"I find that Amazon AWS is expensive."

"The solution is expensive compared to other providers because you need many of the services and it can add up fast."

"A few of our customers pay for it yearly and monthly. Sometimes, when it's related to the data, the pricing seems to be high. It could be cheaper on a transactional basis."

"It's not very pricey, but it could be cheaper."

"Licensing can be purchased on a yearly basis, which is an auto-renewal. We also have an on-demand on-pay purchase."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. I believe we are satisfied with the current pricing. Otherwise, we would have switched to another vendor."

"We are currently paying for the solution on an annual basis."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"I rate the price of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten."

"We pay a monthly fee for the use of SAP S4HANA on AWS for approximately five years. That's the time of the contract."

"SAP S4HANA's pricing model should be more flexible and transparent - there's a lot of negotiation and internal factors, and some customers get better value and services for the same product."

"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The vendors have different pricing, ways of serving, security, and providing the service. You go and compare the offerings. Some might be better with smaller companies. For example, Microsoft Azure can handle small and medium-sized companies best but still can cover some large companies. Whereas Amazon AWS and IBM are going to cover sized companies. There's no clear advantage. Probably Amazon AWS may have been the first to be certified by SAP as a cloud-hosting partner. Then Microsoft Azure and IBM were certified at the same time. You have to partner up and be certified by the software."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

There are many things already there. There just needs to be a document approval workflow, which is not limited to procurement and other documents. There might be an additional document approval wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 18% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS

Compared 9% of the time

Dell ECS vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 69% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

February 2025

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is an adopted cloud platform that offers more than 200 fully featured services from data centers located across the globe. This is a scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that is utilized by thousands of businesses of different sizes around the world. The product offers a wide variety of solutions for its customers, which allows them to launch applications regardless of their industry.

The most common use cases for AWS are:

Application hosting: Clients can take advantage of on-demand infrastructure to power their applications. The product supports multiple types of apps, varying from hosted internal applications to software as a service (SaaS) offerings.
Websites: With AWS, clients can satisfy their web hosting needs through a scalable platform for their websites.
Backup and storage: AWS offers reliable data storage services, which allow clients to store their data and build dependable backups for all of their valuable information.
Enterprise IT: The product allows companies to host internal- or external-facing IT applications in a highly secure environment.
Content delivery: Users who want to distribute content to end users worldwide can do so quickly and easily through the high data transfer speeds of this solution.
Databases: AWS offers a variety of database solutions, which include hosted enterprise database software as well as non-relational database solutions.

Amazon AWS supports a global cloud infrastructure with AWS Region and Availability Zone models, which contribute to the high availability of enterprise applications running on the solution. Amazon AWS has an extensive array of products that serve different purposes, including:

Analytics
Application integration
Blockchain
Business applications
Cloud financial management
Compute
Contact center
Containers
Database
Developer tools
End-user computing
Front-end web and mobile
Games
Internet of Things (IoT)
Machine learning
Management and governance
Quantum technologies
Robotics
Satellite
Security, identity and compliance, and others

The products and services that Amazon AWS delivers to these sectors provide a large computing capacity which is quicker and cheaper compared to building a physical server farm. Among the most popular services are Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, also known as "EC2," and Amazon Simple Storage Service, also known as "S3."

Amazon AWS Features

The wide array of products that Amazon AWS offers consist of different functions that utilize cloud computing across different sectors. The features of this solution can be categorized in the following ways:

Data and relationship management: With Amazon AWS, companies can manage multiple hierarchies of directory data, they can define attributes for objects and relationships, set custom inheritance rules for directories, and create multiple schemas.
Schema management: This group of features allows users to extend their directory schema according to their needs. They can extend it through multiple applications that share a single directory while avoiding duplication of data.
Fully managed infrastructure: This feature decreases time and costs for administrative tasks for companies regarding scaling infrastructure and managing servers.
Searching feature: The Cloud Directory feature of AWS offers built-in search capabilities which can cover sets of highly connected data and eliminate the need of creating nested queries.
Built-in data encryption: Users can benefit from high levels of protection of their data with AWS's products. The data in the cloud is automatically encrypted at rest and in transit through 256-bit encryption keys, managed by AWS Key Management Service (KMS).
Object policies: This feature allows Amazon AWS users to organize objects in different hierarchies by providing a framework for applications to evaluate policy assignments.

Amazon AWS Benefits

This product delivers various benefits across all industries that utilize its services. The greatest advantages of using Amazon AWS include:

High product functionality is supported by machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI), IoT, data lakes, and analytics.
The solution has a high level of security, which is backed by a deep set ofmore than 100 cloud security tools.
Amazon AWS has an easy-to-use interface that makes it possible for clients to host applications.
The product is very flexible in terms of which operating system, programming language, web app platform, and database clients can use.
AWS is a scalable and highly secure global computing infrastructure, supported by the reliability of Amazon.com.
Clients can utilize the Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing tools to personally scale up or down applications, depending on their demand.
Users can choose from an array of payment options, including paying for only the services they need, as well as a free trial to select the ones most useful for them.

Reviews from Real Users

Greg G., a chief executive officer at a tech services company, ranks Amazon AWS highly, as he states that the solution is flexible, scales well, and offers good stability.

A technology manager technology at a computer software company values Amazon AWS because it is extremely cost-efficient, easy to upgrade and expand storage with greatly improved interfaces.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.