Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Organizations benefit from Google Cloud by shortening project timelines and utilizing cost-free tools, achieving substantial time and cost savings.
Sentiment score
7.4
SAP S4HANA on AWS enhances efficiency, offering significant ROI, cost savings, and payback in six to eight months.
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud's support is seen as competent but often criticized for slow response times and separate cost requirements.
Sentiment score
6.4
SAP S4HANA on AWS has good support, with response variability and high costs, needing faster issue logging and expertise.
I consider them good partners when it comes to support.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Google Cloud's scalability and Kubernetes integration enable effortless expansion, appealing to users despite cost considerations.
Sentiment score
7.7
SAP S4HANA on AWS offers high scalability and integration but requires precise setup and skill for effective deployment.
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Google Cloud is praised for reliability, scoring high in stability, but some note rare service-specific issues compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
7.8
SAP S4HANA on AWS is highly stable and reliable, with minor issues mostly attributed to configuration rather than bugs.
 

Room For Improvement

Google Cloud needs improvements in usability, cost, support, integration, security, training, resources, language support, and service expansion.
SAP S4HANA on AWS faces challenges with resource demands, costs, complex setup, integration, and user interface limitations.
Providing more hypervisors would be beneficial.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.
 

Setup Cost

Google Cloud offers flexible pay-as-you-go pricing, but some users find it pricier than competitors like Azure and AWS.
SAP S4HANA on AWS is costly but offers scalability and robust features, with pricing influenced by licensing and configuration.
As far as I know, it is a little more expensive compared to other cloud options.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
 

Valuable Features

Google Cloud offers powerful features like user-friendliness, scalability, security, and managed services, appealing to diverse developer and user needs.
SAP S4HANA on AWS offers seamless integration, advanced analytics, scalability, cost efficiency, and enhanced user experience with Fiori interface.
If customers use different technologies within their environment, GCP cannot offer a full performance analysis covering all the disclosures.
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
It manages complexity in various industries such as banking, manufacturing, and trading.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (5th)
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 8.4%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.7%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases
The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases. The managed service does not allow flexible database configurations that are needed for better filter performance. We have a TPS first-grade, high-volume database using an ERC system. We are moving to Clarity for managed services and need more configurations to support it. The solution could improve its management services for MongoDB. The website's memory only allows one TB.
Bhavesh Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users
CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
52%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
5%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud?
Google Cloud is perceived as a cost-effective and user-friendly option, especially compared to AWS. The current affordability and ease of use make it suitable for medium-sized companies. While the ...
What needs improvement with Google Cloud?
In terms of Google services, providing more hypervisors would be beneficial. Currently, in my region, they don't offer many services as they have just started. They have some local instances, yet i...
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?
My platform offers a monitoring solution for the virtual machines hosted in GCP. GCP is one of the firms that I work with. For customers who use GCP as an infrastructure service, software as a serv...
What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?
With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation. On a scale of one to ten for expense, SAP is a nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?
There are many things already there. There just needs to be a document approval workflow, which is not limited to procurement and other documents. There might be an additional document approval wor...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP S/4HANA on AWS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.