Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Google and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7. Google holds a 8.2% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud

Read 73 Google Cloud reviews

7,351 Views
5,393 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 38 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

3,409 Views
2,891 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

SAP S4HANA on AWS and Google Cloud compete in cloud-based enterprise solutions. SAP S4HANA on AWS seems to have the upper hand in enterprise resource planning due to its robust integration and performance benefits, while Google Cloud is praised for usability and flexible pricing.

Features: SAP S4HANA on AWS distinguishes itself with financial capabilities and process automation, using the HANA database for enhanced speed and efficiency. It offers AI and machine learning capabilities and provides comprehensive module coverage. Google Cloud is known for its ease of use, flexible hosting, and scalability, offering managed services that simplify infrastructure management with a familiar interface.

Room for Improvement: SAP S4HANA on AWS is complex and resource-intensive, with high on-premises hardware costs and integration difficulties. Enhanced technical support and pricing transparency are sought by users. Google Cloud could improve analytics capabilities, multilingual support, and offer more intuitive training resources and smoother integration with external devices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP S4HANA on AWS offers deployment across various environments but faces slow support response times. Google Cloud is mainly used in public cloud deployments with a straightforward implementation process. While its support is effective, improvements in technical documentation and response clarity would be beneficial.

Pricing and ROI: SAP S4HANA on AWS requires strategic financial planning due to high licensing and hardware costs but delivers robust ROI through operational efficiencies. Google Cloud is recognized for competitive, scalable pricing, appealing to small and medium businesses with flexible pay-as-you-go models, though clearer pricing transparency is desirable.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,795 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (5th)

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 8.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 4.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Data Specialist at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases

The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases. The managed service does not allow flexible database configurations that are needed for better filter performance. We have a TPS first-grade, high-volume database using an ERC system. We are moving to Clarity for managed services and need more configurations to support it. The solution could improve its management services for MongoDB. The website's memory only allows one TB.

Read full review

Bhavesh Shah

SAP Cloud Engineer SAP Commvault Backup Administrator- DC Migrations on AWS at CLARIANT SE

With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users

CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP. As suggested by SAP, we should do HANA mini checks on a daily or weekly basis. All the parameters related to HANA should be equal to improve performance. So, some of the parameters I can see on the SAP side are related to memory, and so we have to check on each landscape whether the parameters related to SAP are properly set or not. Regarding the right CPU from AWS and SAP recommended nodes, we have to check whether the performance is good or not because we have to give this almost on HANA since, on some side, we have to be swapping that on voice level also, and so that screening part is a requirement from OS/DB side. In short, we have to check all parameters. My solution is IOPS related to EC2. So I have just done a very good optimization. I have seen some parameters related to Linux that is from SAP side, where the problem is very fast, and CPU load is very low. So that is an OS/DB recommendation parameter from the SAP that it should be set over there on all systems. As a basic start, we have to check OS/DB recommendation settings, and everything should be kept on. Those experienced in SAP S4HANA need not worry about any part. I think overlay IP should be linked to gateway web architecture. It should be in a proper way to the community for the security part. Apart from that, we have to follow Amazon and SAP books. There have to be some adjustments made from the finance and GRC side. So, we have to check some of the functional sides and whether these parameters are properly set in for SAP s1 in terms of logistics, MRV, and some of the code. I can recommend that SAP's 86 custom code should be a proper way to develop a very good experience going online for the custom tools. So, it would be good to improve such features and everything. Also, the system should not be at any end of support since it will impact its performance. I have faced some of the, you know, clients, where they have some end of support, comes into 7209, and they just back it up. I need to get some extended support from the SAP, and some software should be there. So before the end of maintenance, everybody has to awaken all the features of the solution. On a daily production side, we can do this maintenance activity, whether it may be outdated or not outdated, and support patches should be done properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to work with."

"The solution has improved our web apps so that we can have a canary deployment. GCP also helps us upload new features and changes to our software without impacting a lot of users with the network. The AI features have improved the software as well."

"Google Cloud is a good alternative solution. I think it's a better fit for Mac operating systems than Windows. If you're utilizing Google Cloud for something like big data, then their big query is decent."

"There is no downtime. It is very reliable."

"Good storage and ease of access."

"The solution's features are very good and our staff loves using them."

"Google Cloud is user friendly and reliable. The most valuable feature is the security of Google Cloud."

"We worked with Google Cloud to ensure HIPAA compliance approval in health insurance companies."

More Google Cloud pros

"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."

"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."

"I like that they are very familiar with our VM which makes it easy to use."

"The product’s high availability is its best feature."

"There are two main features that we find very valuable. One is the interface and the new user experience. That's really, really helpful for the end-user. The second is the HANA database itself because it speeds up the process. In other solutions, like Oracle, there is a lot of redundancy that slows things down."

"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."

"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."

"The most valuable features of SAP S/4HANA on AWS include its availability and performance."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"Google Cloud would benefit from more detailed practical hands-on training especially in your mother tongue, not just English."

"Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible."

"It could have a reporting tool included."

"The security of the solution can always be improved."

"My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies which means means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

"It would be nice if they could offer more free storage."

"The solution could improve by being less expensive."

"They need to improve the costing for predictive analytics, which is mainly related to the tools that come with AI. They also need to improve the BigQuery cost optimization and the visualization."

More Google Cloud cons

"The solution's overall enterprise support could be improved."

"More availability zones will help customers choose AWS. I would like to see features that provide easier onboarding for ERP solutions like SAP. SAP has already partnered with S/4HANA on AWS for hosting its public cloud as well. More educational videos for customers to choose this cloud path would be great to have. That is, providing more documentation and marketing material would be better."

"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."

"I would like for them to have more integration with virtualization platforms."

"Doesn't have a common development environment."

"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."

"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."

"The documentation isn't clear enough."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For commercial purposes, users need to pay for the products they use on a workload basis, not a license basis. There are two pricing models: fixed monthly and pay-as-you-go. In the pay-as-you-go model, users pay for the resources they use, while in the fixed monthly model, they have 24/7 access to resources for a set monthly fee."

"We use the NGO version so the cloud reasonably priced at $2 to $3 per month."

"Pricing for Google Cloud could be improved. It would be better if it were lower."

"The pricing is rated a six out of ten."

"Google cloud is less expensive than other comparable solutions."

"I don't pay for the license. For me, it's completely free."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as an eight."

"It's not really an expensive solution, but it would be better if there were more flexibility in the pricing model."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

"There are additional modules-wise, it's needed for modules, and also for any new functions."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

"The price of SAP S4HANA on AWS is reasonable, given how much it costs to maintain a scratch-built system. To upgrade the support there is a fee."

"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the solution's pricing an eight."

"We pay an annual subscription fee for the solution, which is slightly expensive."

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

51%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud?

Google Cloud is perceived as a cost-effective and user-friendly option, especially compared to AWS. The current affordability and ease of use make it suitable for medium-sized companies. While the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

The performance after long-term use shows the storage is too full, and I cannot add more storage without paying for it. I want to migrate to another solution if I need to pay for additional storage...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

For personal storage, Google Workspace, Google portal, Google video, Google file, and Google Cloud Shell for programming language.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The pricing of SAP S/4HANA on AWS is between seven to eight, as there are other providers offering lower prices. However, maintaining a certain standard of quality justifies the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

There are no current improvement areas that I can think of. However, having more data centers in different regions would be beneficial. Currently, AWS has data centers in only a limited number of r...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Google Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Modal Labs vs Google Cloud

Compared 1% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 68% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 3% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

December 2024

Download Google Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

November 2024

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Learn More

Google

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

Google Cloud is an Infrastructure as a Service Cloud (IaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution that provides infrastructure tools and services for building applications on top of a public cloud computing platform. As one of the leading global infrastructures, this product allows users to securely manage enterprise data, receive valuable insights, and store documents. Google Cloud provides its various services through tools and services for data warehousing, security key enforcement, application programming interface (API) management, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML).

The use cases of Google Cloud can be divided into four main categories:

Big data
Compute
Services
Storage

The solution is utilized by organizations of all sizes and industries, as it is suitable for the following purposes:

Running and building applications: Google Cloud lets businesses run and build their applications anywhere because of its commitment to open-source, hybrid, and multi-cloud. This can accelerate development time as businesses avoid vendor lock-in.
Data insight: Google Cloud provides companies with advanced ML and analytics for their data. This can facilitate business decisions and improve work processes, as every team member can have access to data reports via this solution.
Security: Utilizing Google's technology, this solution helps users protect and defend their data and applications against threats and harmful activities.
Team collaboration: Google Cloud offers companies advanced collaboration features. They can integrate email, chat, video calling, and document collaboration all in one place when using this platform.

Google Cloud Features

Google Cloud offers multiple features for its clients. Some of these include:

Big data features: The solution offers full big data services through tools such as BigQuery and Google Cloud Dataflow. These tools allow users to process large data queries as well as create, monitor, and receive reports from data processing pipelines.
Containers: The solution offers containers, which allow users to speed up deployment and scale applications.
Cloud debugger: This feature allows users to debug code during the production process. In this way, businesses are able to locate issues early in the code and fix them before deploying the application.
Cloud save: This feature provides the ability to synchronize cloud-stored data across all devices an organization is supporting. Through it, users can save and retrieve information and maintain all data copies up to date.
Cloud trace: This Google Cloud feature allows users to detect the reasons for performance bottlenecks and fix the issues. It also provides users with information on the time their product takes to process certain requests, allowing them to follow performance more closely.
Hosting features: The solution offers two hosting options. App Engine is the PaaS of Google Cloud and Computes Engine is their IaaS.
Load balancing: This feature balances the traffic of multiple compute instances across various geographic regions.
Maintenance: Users receive frequent insight into the performance of their applications and through automations, Google Cloud lets them know of any issues that need to be fixed.

Google Cloud Benefits

Google Cloud brings various benefits to its users. Some of these include the following:

The pricing model of Google Cloud allows users to pay only for the selected features and tools they wish to use, which saves their organizations money.
Users can rely on accelerated content delivery through Google Cloud Content Delivery Network (CDN).
Google Cloud offers a wide variety of tools and libraries, which assist users in the development of cloud applications.
The tool has an advanced admin control that allows users to easily add or remove new users and maintain the security of business platforms.
Google Cloud offers consulting services whereby experts provide assistance with cloud strategy development.
The platform is updated on a frequent basis, which can increase companies' productivity through consistent innovations.
Google Cloud offers remote access from anywhere at all times via Google's web applications.
The solution reduces the risks of data breaches as it offers minimal storage of offline data.
Users can expect support not only from the platform but from the growing online community as well, where their questions can be answered in a timely manner.
The product provides detailed documentation for its clients, allowing them to benefit from tutorials and other samples, in order to learn to work with it in the most efficient way.

Reviews from Real Users

Isuru P., an assistant vice president at a tech services company, likes Google Cloud because it is easy to deploy next-generation applications using it.

An IT solutions consultant at a tech services company rates Google Cloud highly because they find the solution stable with a good user experience and a straightforward setup.

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

December 2024

Free Report: Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.