

SAP S4HANA on AWS and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure compete in the cloud services category. SAP S4HANA on AWS seems to have an upper hand due to its HANA database capable of real-time data management and strong integration features.
Features: SAP S4HANA on AWS provides real-time unified data access with its HANA database, speeds up processing, and reduces redundancy with extensive modules for financial management. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers robust database management, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility, supporting database customization and multiple regions.
Room for Improvement: SAP S4HANA on AWS needs better user accessibility, a modernized interface, and flexible licensing. Challenges include high resource consumption, complex deployment, and limited warehouse management. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure requires improved UI design, comprehensive documentation, and more responsive support, with complexity in integration and deployment.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP S4HANA on AWS has a more established support infrastructure but struggles with complex problem resolution. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers competitive pricing and support but is affected by delayed responses and less coherent documentation, impacting user experience and complicating integration with other applications.
Pricing and ROI: SAP S4HANA on AWS has high initial costs with a strong ROI over time due to process efficiency and integration. It is more expensive than OCI but offers robust features. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is more cost-effective with a pay-as-you-go model, significant savings over competitors, and a compelling proposition despite higher infrastructure costs than AWS.
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.
Having a contact point from Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) allowed for direct email communication.
Oracle support is very friendly and provided free of cost.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.
There are no issues with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure's support for scalability demands.
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.
AWS services typically offer more flexibility to end users.
In Autonomous, for example, where I think an autonomous database should manage storage correctly on its own, my experience is that often we have many allocated storage spaces that are free, but it is impossible to reclaim.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.
Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
A 50% cost reduction compared to AWS was estimated.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)'s cost management tools helped us create a map of the cost of the various objects and services.
Applications using Oracle Database not only work seamlessly on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) but also benefit from a 25% offset on Oracle Database licenses.
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.
It manages complexity in various industries such as banking, manufacturing, and trading.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) | 5.1% |
| SAP S4HANA on AWS | 2.6% |
| Other | 92.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers autonomous database solutions, flexible scalability, and seamless application integration, backed by strong security features. Its competitive pricing and multi-tenancy capabilities provide significant value for enterprises needing comprehensive cloud infrastructure.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure delivers robust database management, frequent updates, and advanced storage and network services. It boasts global pricing consistency and broad accessibility, making it a preferred choice for hosting databases and migrating on-premises applications. Users in diverse sectors rely on its ease of use, particularly in hosting applications and infrastructure management. However, OCI faces challenges in documentation and integration with third-party services and seeks improvement in automation, support responsiveness, and regional availability.
What are the key features of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure?OCI is utilized by companies in sectors like gaming, finance, and IoT for hosting databases and ERP systems. Its robust infrastructure supports high-performance computing and application development, making it a favorable option for integration and analytics tasks. Enterprises benefit from its capability to migrate on-premises systems to the cloud, enhancing their operational efficiency.
SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.