We performed a comparison between SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."
"The interface is easy to manage."
"What I like the most is that we can convert databases into a proper multi-dimensional model, and then we can project with the integration with Power BI."
"It has significantly streamlined our operations."
"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"Ensuring data integrity across finance, supply chain, and other critical areas is paramount for real-time decision-making. Access to accurate and up-to-date information is essential for data protection. While the digital solution primarily serves basic maintenance, the ability to handle these core aspects efficiently is invaluable for your needs."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"The customer has a lot of dependencies on SAP which means they don't have much flexibility to go and update the system when or if they need to. They will need to wait for the quarterly updates. It's possible to maybe raise a special request with SAP if it is absolutely necessary."
"The solution needs to embed or integrate with IBP to fully activate the PPT module with efficiency."
"The main thing is that SAP needs to give better response times for support tickets."
"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"
"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"This product is not mature enough at this point in time."
"Perhaps minor changes to the enterprise structure could be made, but the rest is fine."
"Not just S4 but for SAP in general, the price is a little high because they have implemented a new licensing scheme on a number of connections. The price being too expensive is some of the feedback we get from our customers."
"The drawback of this tool versus an on-site tool is that you've got to upgrade the tool. The software is upgraded as it gets upgraded and you've got to be ready to change whatever processes and do whatever training you need to do."
"The solution needs a warehouse management feature. Right now, there's a built-in WM, but they don't have an EWM extended warehouse management built-in, in S/4HANA. It's a separate product. So if they can add that, that would be great."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"The solution's overall enterprise support could be improved."
"The tool should undergo an overall improvement, including support. Data sharing should also be faster."
"Businesses are particularly interested in process automation, mobile, and web applications. These are the areas that SAP S4HANA is and should be looking to improve on, especially in terms of streamlining processes and automating certain steps."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having the entire solution available as a web solution. They only have Fiori right now, and it's a solution for certain modules, but not for all the modules that SAP currently has. We would like to see the GUI removed, it is not very good. We want it to be web-based."
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 9th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
