SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

SAP and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. SAP is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.2. SAP holds a 1.4% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Read 25 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reviews

1,548 Views
1,440 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 42 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,400 Views
2,376 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

SAP S4HANA on AWS and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud compete in the ERP solutions category. Based on the analysis, SAP S4HANA on AWS has a slight edge due to its superior integration capabilities and performance speed.

Features: SAP S4HANA on AWS is recognized for its high performance, instant data access, and scalability. It integrates well with in-memory processing and offers user-friendly experiences with features like Fiori. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud provides real-time data processing and integration with non-SAP systems, focusing on comprehensive infrastructure management.

Room for Improvement: SAP S4HANA on AWS could enhance stability, simplify deployment models, and improve pricing. Its setup process can be complex with high customization costs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud needs faster technical support, better cost structure, and more flexible third-party integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP S4HANA on AWS supports both public and private cloud deployment with reliable AWS technical support. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers quick deployment responses but could improve its support service efficiency and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SAP S4HANA on AWS is more costly, yet offers significant ROI through its performance and efficiency, with various licensing options. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, though expensive due to high licensing fees, provides comprehensive tools suited for larger enterprises. Both promise long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is 1.4%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 2.4%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP S4HANA on AWS	2.4%
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud	1.4%
Other	96.2%

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Salman Mukhtar Baig

SAP Technical Manager at VS Furniture Middle East

Cloud access has improved reporting and sales operations across global locations

I cannot say anything about what areas of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud could be improved or enhanced because so far, we are happy with this implementation. We are not facing any problem, or I cannot say that this can be improved. Although SAP keeps improving themselves day by day, we cannot say that SAP needs to improve anything. One thing which we face, not as a problem, is the pricing. SAP pricing is a bit higher day by day. Before, it was not too much higher, but I don't know why they are increasing their price. They should see this thing, so other customers, such as SMBs customers or small and mid-sized customers, can also avail this thing. Otherwise, we don't have any problem. First, there is the limitation. If you are a SAP user, you don't feel any problem with the limitation because if you know how to use the product, you can easily implement this thing. Otherwise, if you don't know the business process or how to integrate and implement, it could be a problem. We have a limitation, but we developed some add-ons for this. So we fulfilled these requirements.

Read full review

Jayakrishna Amm

Associate Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

End-to-end accounting has been streamlined and secures data with automated controls

SAP S4HANA on AWS is mostly well secured because you need a VPN of the company you are working in to log in and view only with the VPN. It is not possible to connect to a random network, and it is very safe. In terms of usage and automation, SAP S4HANA on AWS is very good at automation, where instead of manually punching entry by entry as with Tally, Zoho, or NetSuite, you can do a bulk upload and close it from one GL to another GL entry from one T-code to another T-code. These are all the options and features, and it is user-friendly. Once you learn SAP S4HANA on AWS, you tend to know how to customize things and what features you want. You can add in features by working closely with the SAP team, whether it is a direct SAP team or through a contract with some agent. There are numerous things you can do; it is not limited to only one function. You can have end-to-end control, and back-dated entries are not possible as in Tally or Zoho, which is very good in terms of security and safety. There are no accounting frauds; we can even identify who has done an entry by name. It is very secure; a password gets locked automatically after two incorrect attempts, and you have to contact the SAP team for that. Data privacy is very good, and overall, it is a better option. Regarding real-time analytics features in SAP S4HANA on AWS, you can integrate with Qlik or Power BI, and I believe there is also an analytics component within SAP itself. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides one analytics tool, and these tools can be integrated and customized however you want. It is very easy to do analytics; you can download reports or integrate those reports with Power BI. It is very convenient that way. When it comes to AI capabilities integrated with SAP S4HANA on AWS, I am not certain because most of it comes via tools such as Qlik and Power BI. There are multiple other things that can help you integrate and work on it. For example, integrating Power BI with N28 or Cloud is convenient with tools such as Copilot. However, I am unsure how it works in SAP S4HANA on AWS because most organizations do not allow integrating AI with SAP S4HANA on AWS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Now, with the cloud, we can move anywhere in the world and we can easily access it from SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, and even the client can also see the stock availability which they need to order."

"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."

"What I like the most is that we can convert databases into a proper multi-dimensional model, and then we can project with the integration with Power BI."

"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."

"If a customer is looking for the latest innovations or products from SAP this solution is perfect for them."

"The most valuable feature is virtual modeling, which is beneficial because you don't really save the data multiple times the way we did in the past."

"Now, with the cloud, we can move anywhere in the world and we can easily access it from SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud."

"This is a product that I recommend for others."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pros

"The Fiori interface is the most valuable feature; it's one of the highlights that they offer, and the in-memory of S4 is very fast."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."

"Overall, I am very satisfied with the solution, and it has proven to be highly beneficial to our organization."

"It's one of the most stable virtualization softwares I have used."

"We use the product for many different functions; financial production, material management, distribution functions, everything."

"The reporting capability is good, providing very in-depth information, and it manages complexity in various industries such as banking, manufacturing, and trading."

"If you look at this product in comparison with other products in this category, it has more features than really almost any of my customers' needs, and it is specifically much better in financial ability in the way it controls costs and transactions."

"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

Cons

"Enterprise Cloud's reporting could be more automated to improve content accountability, especially regarding BI reports."

"The solution needs to embed or integrate with IBP to fully activate the PPT module with efficiency."

"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."

"The product must provide more details of the errors."

"One thing which we face, not as a problem, is the pricing. SAP pricing is a bit higher day by day."

"The licensing model for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud has changed, and it is not entirely clear for final customers. Instead of named users, they now have to calculate FUEs."

"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."

"SAP support isn't on par with products like Microsoft Azure or AWS. It's nowhere close to the competitors."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud cons

"The product can be very complex. It is not extremely user-friendly."

"The main issue is the pricing, which is typically too high for small companies."

"Currently, AWS has data centers in only a limited number of regions compared to other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having the entire solution available as a web solution. They only have Fiori right now, and it's a solution for certain modules, but not for all the modules that SAP currently has."

"The solution is costlier than other products."

"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."

"Sometimes, the tool has bugs."

"The solution's weakest area is technical support, which needs to be improved quite a bit."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution could be less expensive."

"The price is on little bit higher. For SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, we see roughly five crores per annum."

"Our pricing is based on a yearly contract."

"The product itself is relatively expensive."

"I rate the product's price a five out of ten."

"The licensing of the solution is on a yearly basis. The normal price of the solution is quite high, but I received a special discount by making a purchase near the end of the year."

"The price is high compared to other databases, which is why HANA is still not widely used. Some enterprises prefer Sybase, Oracle, or other traditional databases because HANA is a little pricey. Cost is one factor SAP needs to work on to make it more competitive with other databases. Otherwise, they'll never be able to develop a mass customer base."

"The pricing is reasonable when compared to other vendors like Oracle who offer technology enterprise resource software."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"I rate the price of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten."

"It is a significant investment, around six hundred thousand dollars, and it involves both a one-time on-premises installation on servers and a cloud subscription with different flavors for SAP S4HANA."

"The vendors have different pricing, ways of serving, security, and providing the service. You go and compare the offerings. Some might be better with smaller companies. For example, Microsoft Azure can handle small and medium-sized companies best but still can cover some large companies. Whereas Amazon AWS and IBM are going to cover sized companies. There's no clear advantage. Probably Amazon AWS may have been the first to be certified by SAP as a cloud-hosting partner. Then Microsoft Azure and IBM were certified at the same time. You have to partner up and be certified by the software."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the solution's pricing an eight."

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

University

Healthcare Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

It has significantly streamlined our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP HANA Cloud can be quite costly compared to other solutions. The high licensing costs make it an expensive option, particularly for smaller customers. However, they offer solutions for mid-sized...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

We transitioned from being an existing Business One ( /products/sap-business-one-reviews ) user to using SAP S4HANA on AWS ( /products/sap-s4hana-on-aws-reviews ) because our business outgrew the p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Media Temple IaaS Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Commerce Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 31% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 17% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

Virtuozzo Hybrid Infrastructure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

March 2026

Download SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

March 2026

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is a fully scalable and secure private managed cloud solution. It empowers organizations to unlock the full value of SAP HANA in the cloud - accelerating growth and innovation, driving IT and business transformation, quickly delivering business outcomes, and reducing risk.

SAP

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

FC Bayern Munich, Reuters News Agency, MEMEBOX

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

March 2026

Free Report: SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.