Microsoft Azure and DigitalOcean compete in the cloud services category, each offering unique strengths. Microsoft Azure seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features and enterprise-level integrations.
Features: Microsoft Azure offers a vast array of integrated services ranging from computing, networking, security to compliance, facilitating seamless integration with both Microsoft and non-Microsoft services. It provides robust PaaS and IaaS capabilities, supporting diverse programming languages and deployment scenarios. With a global presence via multiple data centers, Azure enhances application performance by reducing latency. DigitalOcean focuses on simplicity and cost-efficiency, providing a streamlined platform that covers essential cloud services with straightforward pricing, making it attractive for developers prioritizing ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance cost predictability and simplify its pricing model to cater to users who find it complex and occasionally expensive. Improvements in documentation and integration with third-party ecosystems would further streamline Azure's adoption. DigitalOcean faces reliability and latency challenges in some scenarios, along with a limited scope of advanced features and enterprise-level support compared to larger providers. Improving support services and broadening feature sets could enhance user experience for both platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure is well-regarded for its comprehensive support channels and responsive customer service, despite its complexity for new users due to its extensive features. The setup process is straightforward but requires a learning curve for optimal usage. DigitalOcean is commended for its simplicity in deployment, allowing quick server and resource setup, though some users note a need for improved support quality and response times.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure offers competitive pricing with a pay-as-you-go model and enterprise agreements that optimize costs for large-scale deployments, yet pricing complexity may deter smaller businesses. DigitalOcean's pricing is more predictable and perceived as cost-effective for small to mid-sized projects. Despite generally lower costs, Azure's pricing justifies its extensive feature set, providing value for enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions with potential long-term ROI through infrastructure savings and innovation.
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
DigitalOcean support is rated lower than AWS's because we encounter issues more frequently.
Microsoft needs to engage L3 and L2 in support when specified in service tickets.
We eventually get the resolution we seek.
I would rate their technical support a ten because we have various support channels available.
I have not tried vertical scaling yet, but from the documentation, it seems very easy to scale the system.
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
It has different kinds of designs that allow for management and deployment in multi-zones, offering both scalable and non-scalable options.
DigitalOcean is quite stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
It is approximately 50 to 60% stable, reaching 60 to 70% depending on usage levels.
We noticed a few critical servers went down due to a Microsoft Azure-end hardware issue.
We are now migrating clients without the zoning into mandatory multi-zone deployments, so if one zone goes down, their application and database remain live.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments.
There are issues where even with 8 GB RAM, the performance doesn't meet expectations.
The lack of a proper service provider model ultimately led us to cease operations with DigitalOcean.
Recent outages and security issues are also a concern, causing a decrease in confidence, especially when partnering with third-party companies.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
DigitalOcean offers affordable pricing, especially for startups.
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
They have discounts and also provide promotions for a three-year reservation which comes with significant discounts on the infrastructure part.
The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well.
The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.
The team was particularly satisfied with the flexibility of the service and the rules for managing virtual machines on DigitalOcean.
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
If Microsoft gives a report, such as a server performance report in a detailed way, which shows what is consuming more CPU, memory, and disk IO, and network utilization during a particular time, it would be helpful to visualize that information.
What is very interesting in terms of scalability is the automatic possibilities to provision some new machines to be able to absorb the number of users we have in the system.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure | 10.8% |
| DigitalOcean | 2.0% |
| Other | 87.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 140 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
| Large Enterprise | 150 |
Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.
Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.
What are Azure's key features?Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
