Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Real User Monitoring's customer support receives mixed reviews, praised for responsiveness but criticized for expertise and consistency.
Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.0
OpenText Real User Monitoring struggles with outdated architecture, high costs, limited flexibility, and performance issues affecting visibility and integration.
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Real User Monitoring offers good scalability, but incurs higher costs and requires multiple servers for larger infrastructures.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Real User Monitoring costs €30,000 for three years, viewed as reasonable yet variable compared to competitors.
Compared to competitors, the pricing is very less.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
OpenText Real User Monitoring's stability is mixed, affecting usability, but future HTML5 updates promise improved performance.
It is mostly stable, and I would rate its stability at around nine out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText Real User Monitoring provides comprehensive application performance insights with easy implementation, real-time analytics, and seamless infrastructure integration.
The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the availability and performance of a service, are valued.
 

Categories and Ranking

Dynatrace
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
344
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (4th), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (2nd)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
53rd
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Dynatrace is 12.7%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Sathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
The single-agent format is easy to use and accurately captures issues
We are currently migrating from AppDynamics to the solution. AppDynamics is moving toward a fast model and has a few issues with vendor support. It also requires multiple agents for each function. For example, a Java-related APM requires the installation of another agent. The solution is a bit higher priced than AppDynamics but is more user friendly and only requires one agent, so our application teams prefer it.
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive
Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
33%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...
What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?
While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays. Emergency support is unavailable when we raise a P1 ticket for production downtime.
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The solution is used for data center monitoring, real-time monitoring, and automation.
What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The solution does not need extra maintenance but requires some basic maintenance when the product version is old. At least two people, including one senior and one junior, are required to install a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American Express
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.