Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Real User Monitoring Logo

OpenText Real User Monitoring pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
3.3 out of 5
1,932 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers application performance monitoring as its most valuable feature.
Technical support is effective at resolving issues.
Reporting features are beneficial for performance analysis.
Tracking features allow detailed monitoring of user interactions, such as transactions within a banking application.
Real User Monitoring provides near-real-time analytics, aiding in quick access to infrastructure issues.

CONS

OpenText Real User Monitoring lacks support for non-Windows environments.
The technology is considered outdated, with a need to move away from traditional traffic collection methods.
There are issues with login errors and insufficient protocol coverage, limiting information depth and voice-related traffic monitoring.
More research and development is needed to enhance compatibility and ease of integration with other software.
Technical support is problematic, featuring delays and requiring improvements in diagnostics, especially for root cause analysis.
 

OpenText Real User Monitoring Pros review quotes

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2024
Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold.
BV
Sep 6, 2020
The technical support is good at resolving issues.
reviewer844128 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 4, 2019
The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Real User Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CP
Jul 5, 2020
The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring.
reviewer1512756 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2021
The reporting feature is good for us.
YA
Oct 20, 2022
Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
YA
Nov 15, 2024
It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful.
KM
Nov 2, 2021
The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application.
HiteshKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 11, 2024
With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure.
MG
Dec 8, 2021
Very easy to implement.
 

OpenText Real User Monitoring Cons review quotes

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2024
The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software.
BV
Sep 6, 2020
When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported.
reviewer844128 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 4, 2019
One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Real User Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CP
Jul 5, 2020
We would like to see support for non-Windows environments.
reviewer1512756 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2021
This technology is considered to be older.
YA
Oct 20, 2022
Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
YA
Nov 15, 2024
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved.
KM
Nov 2, 2021
Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely.
HiteshKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 11, 2024
The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays.
MG
Dec 8, 2021
Some issues with login errors.