Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.7. New Relic holds a 7.4% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
New Relic
Read 158 New Relic reviews
  • 17,941 Views
  • 14,077 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews
  • 422 Views
  • 322 Comparison Views
58% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic both compete in the real user monitoring category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value for the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analytics, ease of integration, and customization options with actionable insights. New Relic features extensive performance monitoring capabilities, real-time data processing, and intuitive alert systems.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users suggest improvements in reporting functionalities, dashboard interfaces, and faster data refresh rates. New Relic users seek better documentation, simpler setup processes, and enhanced customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is straightforward to deploy with responsive support. New Relic has comprehensive support documentation and robust customer service, though some users experience initial complexities.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is valued for competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness in achieving ROI. New Relic, priced higher, justifies its cost through superior features and reliability, driving significant ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

New Relic
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (5th), AIOps (3rd)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
44th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 7.4%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Iqbal Khowaja - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features
My organization uses many application performance management solutions, such as AppDynamics, New Relic APM, Splunk, and Datadog. I'm the CTO for the state of Hawaii, and across the board, different departments use different APM tools. I'm using the latest version of New Relic APM, but I cannot recall the exact version. My company has a dozen engineers using and monitoring New Relic APM. I'd tell anyone planning to use New Relic APM that it has to fit what you have. For example, most of my company's payload is in AWS, and the tool has adopters and features that CloudWatch cannot provide. Still, New Relic APM can, so you should do a demo or trial run first and see if it's a tool that'll help you with end-to-end monitoring. New Relic APM is working well for my company, so an excellent way to start is to do a trial run to see how the tool works out for your current applications. My rating for the tool is nine out of ten because my experience with it has been great. New Relic also worked closely with my company and has always been upfront on what's available and what's not. My company is a New Relic APM customer.
Read full review
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive
Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"New features are added often."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to execute queries and analyze the data."
"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."
"We have done the New Relic integration with Serverless AWS, which has helped us with monitoring, and keeping our monitoring from our on-premise part with the cloud part."
More New Relic pros
"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."
"It is a good product."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"Very easy to implement."
"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."
"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."
"The reporting feature is good for us."
"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."
More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros
 

Cons

"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."
"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."
"One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"Documentation could be improved in New Relic APM, so users would have more clarity on configuring the dashboard. If New Relic gave better guidelines, users would find it easier to understand the metrics and features of New Relic APM. Another area for improvement is integration with Kubernetes. Currently, the process isn't user-friendly. It's challenging and lacks documentation for users to understand how to integrate New Relic APM with Kubernetes quickly. With multiple levels of Kubernetes dockers and other DBs on different clouds, it's tricky to gather all into New Relic APM on a single dashboard. What I'd like to see in the next version of New Relic APM is a single dashboard where you can easily view which applications fall under specific APMs. If there's a search feature where you can type in a keyword to find out if an APM is related to a particular application, that would be great."
"Some of our customers see New Relic as a promising product to have, and we would like to deliver it to them. The only way we would be able to do that would be if we had server appliance for clients that we could install in their data centres."
"They need to improve the alerting and dashboarding as these are the key features in DevOps."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
More New Relic cons
"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."
"Some issues with login errors."
"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."
"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"This technology is considered to be older."
"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."
"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."
More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."
"The price depends on how many agents you want."
"The price was one of the reasons we chose this solution."
"This is an expensive product."
"The price of New Relic APM could be less expensive. We are using the New Relic APM pro account and it is more costly. When compared to competitors the solution's pricing should be much more realistic."
"I loved this product, but we can no longer afford it, so we dropped it."
"We spend somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000 per month with an annual recommitment of maybe $60,000. These are just ballpark figures."
"The pricing model is a little confusing for beginners. They find it a little expensive, and if you are using it already, then that is not good."
More New Relic pricing and cost advice
"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
"Not expensive."
"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
54%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Government
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
What do you like most about New Relic Insights?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
See all answers
What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?
Email alert customization is limited; it cannot be tailored much, which makes the system more rigid than optimal. The handling of logs from integration tools is not as advanced compared to other to...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs New Relic Logo
Dynatrace vs New Relic
Compared 12% of the time
Elastic Observability vs New Relic Logo
Elastic Observability vs New Relic
Compared 12% of the time
Datadog vs New Relic Logo
Datadog vs New Relic
Compared 9% of the time
Grafana vs New Relic Logo
Grafana vs New Relic
Compared 6% of the time
Sentry vs New Relic Logo
Sentry vs New Relic
Compared 5% of the time
More New Relic Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
New Relic
February 2025
New Relic reportDownload New Relic product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Real User Monitoring
February 2025
OpenText Real User Monitoring reportDownload OpenText Real User Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM
 

Overview

New Relic is a powerful tool for optimizing web pages, tracking user behavior, and monitoring application performance. It helps detect anomalies, generate metrics, and create dashboards for synthetics monitoring, container workloads, stress tests, and more.

New Relic provides organizations with comprehensive insights into APIs, infrastructure, and scalability. It supports mobile and web applications with features like java tracking, health maps, customizable dashboards, and drill-downs. Users benefit from its easy initial setup, accurate alerts, UI monitoring, error tracking, and traceability. New Relic supports multiple ecosystems with straightforward pricing and new feature introductions, offering end-to-end monitoring, thorough data analysis, and effective problem resolution.

What are New Relic's most important features?
  • Java Tracking: Efficiently monitor Java applications.
  • Infrastructure Monitoring: Comprehensive overview of infrastructure health.
  • APM: In-depth application performance monitoring.
  • Tight Integration: Seamless integration across different system layers.
  • Health Maps: Visual representation of system health.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Personalized data display and insights.
  • Drill-Downs: Detailed analysis at multiple levels.
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Application Insights: Detailed understanding of application performance.
  • Accurate Alerts: Immediate notifications for issues.
  • Traceability: Enhanced end-to-end traceability for problem resolution.
  • Scalability: Accommodation of growing infrastructure.
  • Flexible Query Design: Adaptable search and analysis functionality.
  • Reliable Performance: Consistent application monitoring and upkeep.

New Relic is leveraged in industries such as e-commerce, finance, and technology. It helps monitor web traffic, evaluate load balancing, and ensure applications meet performance standards. Companies use it for stress tests, container-based workloads, API monitoring, and infrastructure management. Its integration capabilities are valuable for maintaining performance and scalability across diverse ecosystems, aiding in thorough data analysis and problem resolution.

New Relic

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Buyer's Guide
New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
January 2025
Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.