New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.7. New Relic holds a 8.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 158 New Relic reviews

18,442 Views
14,557 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

453 Views
354 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic both compete in the real user monitoring category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value for the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analytics, ease of integration, and customization options with actionable insights. New Relic features extensive performance monitoring capabilities, real-time data processing, and intuitive alert systems.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users suggest improvements in reporting functionalities, dashboard interfaces, and faster data refresh rates. New Relic users seek better documentation, simpler setup processes, and enhanced customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is straightforward to deploy with responsive support. New Relic has comprehensive support documentation and robust customer service, though some users experience initial complexities.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is valued for competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness in achieving ROI. New Relic, priced higher, justifies its cost through superior features and reliability, driving significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), AIOps (3rd)

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 8.1%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Iqbal Khowaja

Chief Technology Officer at State of Hawaii

Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features

My organization uses many application performance management solutions, such as AppDynamics, New Relic APM, Splunk, and Datadog. I'm the CTO for the state of Hawaii, and across the board, different departments use different APM tools. I'm using the latest version of New Relic APM, but I cannot recall the exact version. My company has a dozen engineers using and monitoring New Relic APM. I'd tell anyone planning to use New Relic APM that it has to fit what you have. For example, most of my company's payload is in AWS, and the tool has adopters and features that CloudWatch cannot provide. Still, New Relic APM can, so you should do a demo or trial run first and see if it's a tool that'll help you with end-to-end monitoring. New Relic APM is working well for my company, so an excellent way to start is to do a trial run to see how the tool works out for your current applications. My rating for the tool is nine out of ten because my experience with it has been great. New Relic also worked closely with my company and has always been upfront on what's available and what's not. My company is a New Relic APM customer.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive

Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."

"The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is the dashboard, New Relic Insights. I configured my own dashboard to monitor certain parameters."

"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."

"Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort."

"We are able to drill down and see what is going on in the system."

"The solution offers good documentation."

"The feature I found most valuable is being able to design my queries. It's easy to design a query."

"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."

More New Relic pros

"Very easy to implement."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."

"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."

"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"The solution does not provide input on how the page performs in a big group. It just says that the page performance is bad, but it does not say what can be done to improve it. If they could provide some insight or guidance on how to make improvements, that would be a big help."

"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."

"Real-user monitoring would be helpful as it would help me to really understand the client-side performance of the application."

"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."

"The scalability can be improved."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"New Relic is very slow, and the app is a bit frustrating to use, which is something that has been happening a lot in the past year. During the last six months, I have noticed that it has become extremely laggy."

"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."

More New Relic cons

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

"This technology is considered to be older."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price depends on how many agents you want."

"They gave us aggressive discounts when they were brought in for the first time, but they have also kept them for the year-on-year renewals, which has been absolutely fine."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive."

"The pricing is okay comparatively their competitors. The only concern was whether it should be purchased on demand or bring your own license, and which way passes some savings onto the end customers."

"We feel it's a little bit pricey."

"This solution required a license and it is better than some other competitors."

"The monthly cost os $1000 per server per month, but it could be even more. We pay about $250 for the server, and then New Relic wants over $1000 to give us statistics on those servers."

"There is a picture which goes to your browser and it monitors requests from other users. However, it's impossible to use now because the price is very high. The feature is very nice, but I tried it during the trial period, and the current price makes it impossible to use."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"Not expensive."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

Email alert customization is limited; it cannot be tailored much, which makes the system more rigid than optimal. The handling of logs from integration tools is not as advanced compared to other to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

January 2025

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

January 2025

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM

Learn More

New Relic

OpenText

Overview

New Relic is a powerful tool for optimizing web pages, tracking user behavior, and monitoring application performance. It helps detect anomalies, generate metrics, and create dashboards for synthetics monitoring, container workloads, stress tests, and more.

New Relic provides organizations with comprehensive insights into APIs, infrastructure, and scalability. It supports mobile and web applications with features like java tracking, health maps, customizable dashboards, and drill-downs. Users benefit from its easy initial setup, accurate alerts, UI monitoring, error tracking, and traceability. New Relic supports multiple ecosystems with straightforward pricing and new feature introductions, offering end-to-end monitoring, thorough data analysis, and effective problem resolution.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Java Tracking: Efficiently monitor Java applications.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Comprehensive overview of infrastructure health.
APM: In-depth application performance monitoring.
Tight Integration: Seamless integration across different system layers.
Health Maps: Visual representation of system health.
Customizable Dashboards: Personalized data display and insights.
Drill-Downs: Detailed analysis at multiple levels.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Application Insights: Detailed understanding of application performance.
Accurate Alerts: Immediate notifications for issues.
Traceability: Enhanced end-to-end traceability for problem resolution.
Scalability: Accommodation of growing infrastructure.
Flexible Query Design: Adaptable search and analysis functionality.
Reliable Performance: Consistent application monitoring and upkeep.

New Relic is leveraged in industries such as e-commerce, finance, and technology. It helps monitor web traffic, evaluate load balancing, and ensure applications meet performance standards. Companies use it for stress tests, container-based workloads, API monitoring, and infrastructure management. Its integration capabilities are valuable for maintaining performance and scalability across diverse ecosystems, aiding in thorough data analysis and problem resolution.

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

January 2025

Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.