Elastic Observability vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Elastic and Logsign are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.9, while Logsign is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.7. Elastic holds a 1.9% mindshare in LM, compared to Logsign’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Logsign users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 24 Elastic Observability reviews

3,545 Views
2,991 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

690 Views
552 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Elastic Observability compete in the areas of security information management and observability platforms. Users often favor Elastic Observability for its comprehensive features, though Logsign receives attention for its pricing and support.

Features: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is praised for its user-friendly automation, effective security operations management, and intuitive interface. Elastic Observability offers extensive data analysis, seamless integration, and flexible data handling, making it highly favored for its broad feature set.

Room for Improvement: Logsign needs better scalability, advanced threat intelligence integrations, and more powerful analytics tools. Elastic Observability users desire improvements in ease of use, more intuitive configuration, and streamlined workflow processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM benefits from easy deployment and responsive customer support, ensuring a smooth integration process. Elastic Observability's deployment can be complex, but this is mitigated by extensive documentation and robust community support.

Pricing and ROI: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and quick ROI, making it appealing to organizations with limited budgets. Elastic Observability, though more expensive, is justified by its rich features and flexibility, viewed as a long-term investment for those needing advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,528 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Log Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Log Management

44th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.9%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Subramani K

Solution Architect at HCL Technologies

Jun 27, 2022

The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed.

So Elastic is basically clusters, right? Basically three, we can go with the basic cluster is a three note cluster. So the implementation is quite simple. It's not very complex. So we have to architect the solution in such a way that we have the right number of replicas and right number of charts and all those to hold the data. So basically we have to architect based on the data ingestion, how much data we are going to ingest in the cluster. So this setup is pretty simple, but we have to have the right inputs, right decisions in place before we even implement it.

Read full review

Ayaz Ahmed

Cyber Security Specialist at lums

Apr 25, 2024

Works well for threat detection and security

We use Logsign SIEM for various tasks in our daily operations. One key use case is for forensic analysis. We also use it to monitor critical servers and generate security alerts for actions like logins, logoffs, or reboots. Additionally, we can search for specific information using the interface or…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has always been a stable solution."

"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

"The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

More Elastic Observability pros

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

Cons

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"There could be more low-code features included in the product."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

"The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages."

More Elastic Observability cons

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"The product is not that cheap."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cheaper in terms of pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I don't know how Elastic can improve. The integration feature I am using is very easy to implement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

It does not have much AI and machine learning features yet. They are developing them and will be releasing them in a few months.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine. I can recommend it. Not for large enterp...

See all answers

Comparisons

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 17% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 49% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 19% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

October 2024

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

October 2024

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Learn More

Elastic

Logsign

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Logsign delivers automation-driven cyber security solutions and are committed to providing the smartest, easiest-to-use and most affordable cybersecurity detection and response solutions and value-added services. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is an enterprise-grade SIEM, inline with our promise, it's easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable unlike the other enterprise-grade SIEM softwares.

Easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable SIEM for all.
Unlimited scalability, high availability - cluster SIEM, big data infrastructure.
Deploy on every environment, on-premise solution.
400+ predefined integrations and free plugin service.
Collects & stores unlimited data.
Threat hunting, fast search & investigation, advanced behavior analysis, IOC detection.
Real-time detection & prevention, wide correlation library based on Mitre Att&ck framework.
Real-time monitoring, predefined dashboards & reports, meeting compliance requirements (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX and more).
Automated notifications, automated actions.
Flexible pricing options, and more information and for more automated response features, please look for our SOAR platform.

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

October 2024

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.