Elastic Observability vs NNT Log Tracker Enterprise comparison

Elastic and Netwrix are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1, while Netwrix is ranked #65. Elastic holds a 1.5% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Netwrix’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 26 Elastic Observability reviews

2,906 Views
2,520 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews

168 Views
105 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and Elastic Observability are leading tools in monitoring and security log management. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive analytics features.

Features: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is known for its robust compliance, detailed audits, and real-time security notifications. Elastic Observability offers analytics with advanced log searching, versatile alerting, and powerful visualization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve in third-party system integrations, real-time alerts, and feature scalability. Elastic Observability users suggest enhancements in usability for new users, cloud integration efficiency, and overall UI intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is recognized for straightforward deployment and dependable customer service. Elastic Observability's deployment is more complex; however, its support team effectively handles intricate client needs.

Pricing and ROI: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers competitive setup costs with substantial ROI through its compliance functionalities. Elastic Observability, although higher in cost, provides ROI for data-heavy enterprises due to its extensive analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

65th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (61st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.5%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Jagganath Tendle

Senior Infra Manager at Tech Mahindra Limited

Good file integrity monitoring and change tracking tools but the knowledge base needs to be available online

For the NNT Log Tracker and Change Tracker, they have to make their knowledge base available online because there is very little information available on the internet. I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."

"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

"The product has connectors to many services."

"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."

"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

More Elastic Observability pros

"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."

"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."

Cons

"There could be more low-code features included in the product."

"Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."

"Elastic Observability is an excellent product for monitoring and visibility, but it lacks predictive analytics. Most solutions are aligned with the AIOps requirements, but this piece is missing in Elastic and should be included."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

More Elastic Observability cons

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."

"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."

"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."

"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Of course, maintenance is necessary, as with any software, requiring updates with the latest features and security enhancements. It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like netw...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

April 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

March 2025

Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is a comprehensive and easy-to-use Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution for any compliance mandate providing:

Enterprise-class SIEM capabilities.
Compliance Automation.
User and System Activity Audit trails.
Network Anomaly forensics.
Proactive Threat Detection.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Wonga, WHSmith

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

April 2025

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.