Elastic Observability vs Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service comparison

Elastic and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9, while Oracle is ranked #62. Elastic holds a 6.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Oracle’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution.

Elastic Observability

Read 26 Elastic Observability reviews

11,476 Views
9,830 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Performa...

586 Views
500 Comparison Views

Elastic Observability

Oracle Application Performa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), Log Management (13th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Oracle Application Performa...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

62nd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 6.5%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Nov 7, 2024

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

We have our workload in the cloud, and we take the data from the workload, put it in a data lake, and then analyze it. We keep track, build down anomalies, and so on The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they…

Read full review

Use Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service?

Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cheaper in terms of pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I don't know how Elastic can improve. The integration feature I am using is very easy to implement.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 17% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

New Relic vs Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 40% of the time

Dynatrace vs Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

AppDynamics vs Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 15% of the time

Datadog vs Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

November 2024

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2024

Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service product report

Learn More

Elastic

Oracle

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service is a software-as-a service solution that provides deep visibility into your application performance from end-user experience, through application server requests, and down to application logs. With Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service you can isolate problems before they impact your business, break down the barriers between Development and Operations teams and deliver better applications.

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Safexpress, Astute Business Solutions, FORS Distribution

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.