Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs SAP Intelligent RPA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
ElectroNeek is considered moderately to highly scalable, supporting modular programming in JavaScript and Python for diverse applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.0
ElectroNeek needs improved integration, pricing, custom activities, remote desktop support, Edge compatibility, OCR, and web scraping features.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
ElectroNeek offers affordable, user-friendly automation with no-code features, unlimited bots, intuitive design, and comprehensive learning resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
ElectroNeek is stable and cost-effective, though users report interface challenges and stability issues across platform versions.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
ElectroNeek customer service is generally responsive and effective, with high ratings despite occasional delays in addressing issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
ElectroNeek offers affordable enterprise solutions with initial costs offset by low recurrent fees, receiving a satisfaction rating of 7-8/10.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (10th)
SAP Intelligent RPA
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
15th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Intelligent RPA is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Ishmael Munyai - PeerSpot reviewer
With an easy initial setup phase in place, the tool needs to provide functionalities like web scraping to users
It is a very scalable solution. In ElectroNeek, you can build your project in modular programming or with the use of sub-programs. You can have a lot of sub-programs that make up a whole project. If you don't wanna use the drag-and-drop activities, you can use JavaScript or Python instead. So it's very useful when you are working with things such as SPS. Actually, you can write scripts to support all the product functionalities with Python and manage the product's functions. You will find a company named Apollo Studios on the website of ElectroNeek. I think they are one of the best companies in South Africa that entered into a partnership with ElectroNeek.
Keerthana Jayathran - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers integration of the document extraction service into SAP ALC, enabling the direct upload and extraction of details
I found that SAP Intelligent RPA can be somewhat unstable when using SAP GUI. When we upgraded from SAP GUI version 7.50 to version 7.70, we had to update our SAP Intelligent RPA screens even though the screens were the same. This was difficult and time-consuming. The one I would like to see is in context with the screens, if they are using the same SAP UI, and if it updates, it should not be changed. At least it should be able to identify the screen. There should be more of an error, like a proper error feature, in future releases. Sometimes, we don't understand why that automation is not learning what, like, where it is stuck, what the reason is, or what the criteria we are missing to add. A proper error message would be helpful.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ElectroNeek?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ElectroNeek?
My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.
What do you like most about SAP Contextor?
The standout features of SAP Intelligent RPA are its flexibility and integration capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Contextor?
The pricing for SAP Intelligent RPA operates on a model that considers power usage and transactions per job. It is adaptable based on the number of cases and the specific needs of our business. The...
What needs improvement with SAP Contextor?
The tool's licensing has been kind of a challenge. If the tool can bring up a usage-based licensing model, it would be really good. Even a flat rate kind of licensing model would be good, where, fo...
 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
SAP Contextor, Contextor
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
BNP Paribas, Societe Generale, Kabel Deutschland, Orange, Carrefour
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. SAP Intelligent RPA and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.