Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs SAP Intelligent RPA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
ElectroNeek customer service is generally responsive and effective, with high ratings despite occasional delays in addressing issues.
Sentiment score
7.3
SAP Intelligent RPA offers responsive, high-quality customer service and technical support, though some prefer Contextor for cost efficiency.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
ElectroNeek is considered moderately to highly scalable, supporting modular programming in JavaScript and Python for diverse applications.
Sentiment score
7.5
SAP Intelligent RPA is scalable for large companies but less suited for startups, efficiently handling numerous users and scenarios.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
ElectroNeek is stable and cost-effective, though users report interface challenges and stability issues across platform versions.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

ElectroNeek needs improved integration, pricing, custom activities, remote desktop support, Edge compatibility, OCR, and web scraping features.
 

Setup Cost

ElectroNeek offers affordable enterprise solutions with initial costs offset by low recurrent fees, receiving a satisfaction rating of 7-8/10.
SAP Intelligent RPA offers SaaS pricing based on usage, providing competitive, adaptable, and economical options for enterprises over time.
 

Valuable Features

ElectroNeek offers affordable, user-friendly automation with no-code features, unlimited bots, intuitive design, and comprehensive learning resources.
SAP Intelligent RPA offers flexible integration, ease of use, and robust automation features, supporting languages, templates, and strong CRM/API management.
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (10th)
SAP Intelligent RPA
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
14th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Intelligent RPA is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge
We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…
Keerthana Jayathran - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers integration of the document extraction service into SAP ALC, enabling the direct upload and extraction of details
I found that SAP Intelligent RPA can be somewhat unstable when using SAP GUI. When we upgraded from SAP GUI version 7.50 to version 7.70, we had to update our SAP Intelligent RPA screens even though the screens were the same. This was difficult and time-consuming. The one I would like to see is in context with the screens, if they are using the same SAP UI, and if it updates, it should not be changed. At least it should be able to identify the screen. There should be more of an error, like a proper error feature, in future releases. Sometimes, we don't understand why that automation is not learning what, like, where it is stuck, what the reason is, or what the criteria we are missing to add. A proper error message would be helpful.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ElectroNeek?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ElectroNeek?
My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.
What do you like most about SAP Contextor?
The standout features of SAP Intelligent RPA are its flexibility and integration capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Contextor?
The pricing for SAP Intelligent RPA operates on a model that considers power usage and transactions per job. It is adaptable based on the number of cases and the specific needs of our business. The...
What needs improvement with SAP Contextor?
The tool's licensing has been kind of a challenge. If the tool can bring up a usage-based licensing model, it would be really good. Even a flat rate kind of licensing model would be good, where, fo...
 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
SAP Contextor, Contextor
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
BNP Paribas, Societe Generale, Kabel Deutschland, Orange, Carrefour
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. SAP Intelligent RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.